Paper · 2021 · The Pharma Innovation

Broad leaf weed management in wheat by pre-emergence and pre-mix post-emergence combinations of herbicides under different irrigation schedule

Kairovin Lakra

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A 2-years study was conducted to assess the impact of irrigation schedule and weed management practices on broad leaf weed (BLW) flora and wheat dry matter production. Experiments were conducted during Rabi season of 2017-18 to 2018-19 at CSAUAT, Kanpur under split-plot design with four replication having four irrigation regimes were assigned to main plots and eight weed management practices were allocated to sub plots. Irrigations at crown root initiation (CRI) and active tillering stage (I1) significantly reduce the density and weight of BLW with highest WCE and crop resistance index (CRI) over other irrigation regimes. However, irrigation at CRI+ jointing+ booting+ flowering+ milking stage (I4) recorded highest weed effectiveness (WE) and dry matter yield (CDMY) followed by irrigation at CRI + active tillering + booting + flowering stage (I3). All the weed management treatments significantly reduced the density and weight of BLW resulted maximum crop dry matter yield over weedy check. Among herbicidal treatments, lowest density, fresh and dry weight of BLW, WE and the highest WCE, CRI, WPI and CDMY was recorded with the application of broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DAS and it was statistically at par with clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DAS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at crown root initiation and active tillering reduced broadleaf weed density and weight significantly.

Treatment
Irrigations at crown root initiation (CRI) and active tillering stage (I1)e0
Interactor
BLWe0weed
Outcome
density and weight of BLWe0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
other irrigation regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigations at crown root initiation (CRI) and active tillering stage (I1) significantly reduce the density and weight of BLW with highest WCE and crop resistance index (CRI) over other irrigation regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I1 schedule produced the highest weed control efficiency and crop resistance index.

Treatment
Irrigations at crown root initiation (CRI) and active tillering stage (I1)e0
Outcome
WCE and crop resistance index (CRI)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other irrigation regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigations at crown root initiation (CRI) and active tillering stage (I1) significantly reduce the density and weight of BLW with highest WCE and crop resistance index (CRI) over other irrigation regimes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 424–629 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I4 irrigation schedule had the highest weed effectiveness.

Treatment
irrigation at CRI+ jointing+ booting+ flowering+ milking stage (I4)e0
Outcome
weed effectiveness (WE)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI + active tillering + booting + flowering stage (I3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at CRI+ jointing+ booting+ flowering+ milking stage (I4) recorded highest weed effectiveness (WE) and dry matter yield (CDMY) followed by irrigation at CRI + active tillering + booting + flowering stage (I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I4 irrigation schedule had the highest crop dry matter yield.

Treatment
irrigation at CRI+ jointing+ booting+ flowering+ milking stage (I4)e0
Outcome
dry matter yield (CDMY)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
irrigation at CRI + active tillering + booting + flowering stage (I3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at CRI+ jointing+ booting+ flowering+ milking stage (I4) recorded highest weed effectiveness (WE) and dry matter yield (CDMY) followed by irrigation at CRI + active tillering + booting + flowering stage (I3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–857 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All weed-management treatments significantly reduced broadleaf weed density and weight relative to the weedy check.

Treatment
weed management treatmentse0
Interactor
BLWe0weed
Outcome
density and weight of BLWe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed management treatments significantly reduced the density and weight of BLW resulted maximum crop dry matter yield over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-management treatments maximized wheat dry matter yield relative to the weedy check.

Treatment
weed management treatmentse0
Outcome
crop dry matter yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed management treatments significantly reduced the density and weight of BLW resulted maximum crop dry matter yield over weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1002 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadway gave the lowest broadleaf weed density, fresh weight and dry weight among herbicides.

Treatment
broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0
Interactor
BLWe0weed
Outcome
density, fresh and dry weight of BLWe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest density, fresh and dry weight of BLW, WE and the highest WCE, CRI, WPI and CDMY was recorded with the application of broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DAS and it was statistically at par with clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadway gave the lowest weed effectiveness among herbicides.

Treatment
broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0
Outcome
WEe0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowest density, fresh and dry weight of BLW, WE and the highest WCE, CRI, WPI and CDMY was recorded with the application of broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DAS and it was statistically at par with clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadway gave the highest weed control efficiency, crop resistance index and weed persistence index.

Treatment
broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0
Outcome
WCE, CRI, WPIe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest WCE, CRI, WPI and CDMY was recorded with the application of broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DAS and it was statistically at par with clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadway gave the highest wheat crop dry matter yield.

Treatment
broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0
Outcome
CDMYe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest WCE, CRI, WPI and CDMY was recorded with the application of broadway (carfentrazone ethyl 20% + sulfosulfuron 25%WG) 100 g ha-1 at 35 DAS and it was statistically at par with clodinafop- propagyl 15% + metsulfuron 1% 400 g ha-1 at 35 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑

crown compound · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

crown compound · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

carfentrazone-ethyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

tillage · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

183 papers: 126 positive, 57 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

179 papers more in this group

See all 183 papers →

irrigation · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 15 positive, 8 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

irrigation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 51 positive, 28 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.