Paper · 2021 · Egyptian Journal of Agronomy

Effect of Salinity and Magnetically-Treated Saline Water on the Physiological and Agronomic Traits of Some Bread Wheat Genotypes

Alaa A. Said; Abdel-Rahman A. Mustafa; Alhosein Hamada

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

THE PRESENT investigation was carried out to evaluate the effect of salinity and saline water magnetization on physiological and agronomic traits of 32 bread wheat genotypes and to determine the changes in soil properties. These genotypes were grown in pot experiments under greenhouse conditions during the winter growing seasons of 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 at Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt and subjected to tap water (control), salinity levels (2,500 and 5,000ppm) and magnetically treated (2,500 and 5,000ppm) saline water. Results showed that values of soil soluble cations and anions were significantly lower under treated magnetic water (TMW). Moreover, magnetic saline water had a positive effect on relative water content by 7.84 and 7.10%, chlorophyll concentration by 6.03 and 9.92% and attributed to decrease the canopy temperature by 7.98 and 10.23% respectively in contrast with 2500 and 5000ppm saline water. Also, it increased plant height to 6.66 and 13.10%, 4.39 and 4.27% for number of spikes/plant, 5.18 and 8.18% for spike length, 5.13 and 10.57%, for biological yield/plant and 6.89 and 7.94% for grain yield/plant compared to irrigation saline water. Indeed, more studies are required to declare the impacts of magnetic water on the growth, yield and quality of other different crops. Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI) revealed that lines 9, 16, 3 recorded the lowest values of 0.57, 0.75 and 0.76, respectively, this showing relatively salt tolerant lines compared to other wheat genotypess and introducing new genetic sources for salt tolerance into breeding programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic water significantly lowered soluble soil cations and anions.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
treated magnetic watere0
Outcome
soil soluble cations and anionse0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“values of soil soluble cations and anions were significantly lower under treated magnetic water (TMW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed relative water content by 7.84 and 7.10% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
magnetic saline watere0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
positivee0
Value
7.84 and 7.10%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“magnetic saline water had a positive effect on relative water content by 7.84 and 7.10%, chlorophyll concentration by 6.03 and 9.92% and attributed to decrease the canopy temperature by 7.98 and 10.23% respectively in contrast with 2500 and 5000ppm saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed chlorophyll concentration by 6.03 and 9.92% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
magnetic saline watere0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
positivee0
Value
6.03 and 9.92%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“magnetic saline water had a positive effect on relative water content by 7.84 and 7.10%, chlorophyll concentration by 6.03 and 9.92% and attributed to decrease the canopy temperature by 7.98 and 10.23% respectively in contrast with 2500 and 5000ppm saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed canopy temperature by 7.98 and 10.23% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
magnetic saline watere0
Outcome
canopy temperaturee0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
7.98 and 10.23%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“magnetic saline water had a positive effect on relative water content by 7.84 and 7.10%, chlorophyll concentration by 6.03 and 9.92% and attributed to decrease the canopy temperature by 7.98 and 10.23% respectively in contrast with 2500 and 5000ppm saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed plant height by 6.66 and 13.10% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Magnetically-Treated Saline Watert1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.66 and 13.10%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“it increased plant height to 6.66 and 13.10%, 4.39 and 4.27% for number of spikes/plant, 5.18 and 8.18% for spike length, 5.13 and 10.57%, for biological yield/plant and 6.89 and 7.94% for grain yield/plant compared to irrigation saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1195 · show in text ↑
t1

“Magnetically-Treated Saline Water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed number of spikes/plant by 4.39 and 4.27% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Magnetically-Treated Saline Watert1
Outcome
number of spikes/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.39 and 4.27%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“it increased plant height to 6.66 and 13.10%, 4.39 and 4.27% for number of spikes/plant, 5.18 and 8.18% for spike length, 5.13 and 10.57%, for biological yield/plant and 6.89 and 7.94% for grain yield/plant compared to irrigation saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1195 · show in text ↑
t1

“Magnetically-Treated Saline Water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed spike length by 5.18 and 8.18% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Magnetically-Treated Saline Watert1
Outcome
spike lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.18 and 8.18%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“it increased plant height to 6.66 and 13.10%, 4.39 and 4.27% for number of spikes/plant, 5.18 and 8.18% for spike length, 5.13 and 10.57%, for biological yield/plant and 6.89 and 7.94% for grain yield/plant compared to irrigation saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1195 · show in text ↑
t1

“Magnetically-Treated Saline Water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed biological yield/plant by 5.13 and 10.57% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Magnetically-Treated Saline Watert1
Outcome
biological yield/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.13 and 10.57%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“it increased plant height to 6.66 and 13.10%, 4.39 and 4.27% for number of spikes/plant, 5.18 and 8.18% for spike length, 5.13 and 10.57%, for biological yield/plant and 6.89 and 7.94% for grain yield/plant compared to irrigation saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1195 · show in text ↑
t1

“Magnetically-Treated Saline Water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnetic saline water changed grain yield/plant by 6.89 and 7.94% relative to saline water.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Magnetically-Treated Saline Watert1
Outcome
grain yield/plante0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.89 and 7.94%e0
Comparator
saline watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“it increased plant height to 6.66 and 13.10%, 4.39 and 4.27% for number of spikes/plant, 5.18 and 8.18% for spike length, 5.13 and 10.57%, for biological yield/plant and 6.89 and 7.94% for grain yield/plant compared to irrigation saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1195 · show in text ↑
t1

“Magnetically-Treated Saline Water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line 9 had a low stress susceptibility index of 0.57.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
lines 9e0
Outcome
Stress Susceptibility Indexe0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.57e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
e0

“Stress Susceptibility Index (SSI) revealed that lines 9, 16, 3 recorded the lowest values of 0.57, 0.75 and 0.76, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1457 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 9 positive, 49 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 9 positive, 61 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 197 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

salinity · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

377 papers: 49 positive, 328 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 327 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

373 papers more in this group

See all 377 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.