Paper · 2018

Biocontrol potential of a Burkholderia sp against tomato soil borne fungal pathogens

Rajendran Ramjegathesh; Adesh Ramsubhag; Rethinasamy Velazhahan; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The biocontrol potential of a new Burkholderia sp strain-V-1 was evaluated under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Tomato seeds, when treated with the bacterial suspension, showed significant increase in germination percentage, root and shoot length and seedling vigour. The Burkholderia sp strain-V-1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solani, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro conditions. A talc-based powder formulation of Burkholderia sp strain-1 was developed and evaluated for its efficacy in the management of tomato soil-borne pathogens under greenhouse conditions. Seed treatment combined with soil application of the talc powder formulation of Burkholderia sp significantly reduced the incidence of damping off, wilt, root rot and Southern stem blight in green house conditions. Bacterial inoculation in plants led to augmentation of phenolic levels and upregulation of activities of defense enzymes including phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), ? 1,3 glucanase and chitinase in leaves and roots of tomato. The increase in phenolic levels and enhanced defense enzyme activities in roots were observed up to 7 days after inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia seed treatment significantly increased tomato germination percentage, root and shoot length, and seedling vigour.

Treatment
treated with the bacterial suspensione0
Outcome
germination percentage, root and shoot length and seedling vigoure0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato seeds, when treated with the bacterial suspension, showed significant increase in germination percentage, root and shoot length and seedling vigour.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia strain V-1 inhibited Pythium aphanidematum mycelial growth in vitro.

Treatment
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0
Interactor
Pythium aphanidematume0pathogen
Second interactor
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematume0
Direction
inhibitede0
Setting
in vitro conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Burkholderia sp strain-V-1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solani, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia strain V-1 inhibited Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solani mycelial growth in vitro.

Treatment
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0
Interactor
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solaniFusarium oxysporume0pathogen
Second interactor
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solanie0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum · InteractorClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Burkholderia sp strain-V-1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solani, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia strain V-1 inhibited Rhizoctonia solani mycelial growth in vitro.

Treatment
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Burkholderia sp strain-V-1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solani, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burkholderia strain V-1 inhibited Sclerotium rolfsii mycelial growth in vitro.

Treatment
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0
Interactor
Sclerotium rolfsiiAgroathelia rolfsiie0pathogen
Second interactor
Burkholderia sp strain-V-1e0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
mycelial growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Agroathelia rolfsii
Agroathelia rolfsii · InteractorEdward L. Barnard - Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Burkholderia sp strain-V-1 inhibited the mycelial growth of Pythium aphanidematum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp solani, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii under in vitro conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–463 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined seed and soil Burkholderia formulation significantly reduced tomato damping off, wilt, root rot and Southern stem blight incidence in the greenhouse.

Treatment
Seed treatment combined with soil application of the talc powder formulation of Burkholderia spe0
Interactor
Burkholderia spBurkholderiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
incidence of damping off, wilt, root rot and Southern stem blighte0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
green house conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia
Burkholderia · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMelww at English Wikipedia · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment combined with soil application of the talc powder formulation of Burkholderia sp significantly reduced the incidence of damping off, wilt, root rot and Southern stem blight in green house conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased phenolic levels in tomato leaves and roots.

Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
phenolic levelse0
Direction
augmentatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation in plants led to augmentation of phenolic levels and upregulation of activities of defense enzymes including phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), ? 1,3 glucanase and chitinase in leaves and roots of tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1132 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial inoculation increased defense enzyme activities in tomato leaves and roots.

Organ / stage
leaves and rootse0
Treatment
Bacterial inoculatione0
Gene
phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), ? 1,3 glucanase and chitinasee0
Outcome
activities of defense enzymese0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacterial inoculation in plants led to augmentation of phenolic levels and upregulation of activities of defense enzymes including phenyl alanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), ? 1,3 glucanase and chitinase in leaves and roots of tomato.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1132 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated phenolics and defense enzyme activities persisted in tomato roots for up to seven days after inoculation.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
increase in phenolic levels and enhanced defense enzyme activitiese0
Qualifier
up to 7 days after inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase in phenolic levels and enhanced defense enzyme activities in roots were observed up to 7 days after inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–56 · show in text ↑

Burkholderia · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 37 positive, 3 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 49 positive, 4 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 51 positive, 3 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

application · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 134 positive, 16 negative or no effect

133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

botanical · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 146 positive, 14 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.