Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Production

PHYSIOLOGICAL EFFECT OF SOME BIOREGULATORS ON WHEAT PLANTS GROWN UNDER SALT STRESS

I. El-Shamey

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8) were treated with some bioregulators (proline 10& 20ppm) , Salicylic acid (50 & 100 ppm) and paclobutrazol (25ppm) ) with three salinity levels (0, 1000and 6000 ppm NaCl). The results showed that, without bioregulators application, increasing NaCl levels increased root / shoot ratio to be 5 fold at 6000 ppm higher than control treatment. Adding the bioregulators obviously decreased the root/ shoot ratio under salt stress. Similar trend was detected for the grains yield (g) plant-1 at harvest stage. Whereas, the highest level of salinity caused a decrease of grain yield (g) plant-1 around 14 times lower than that obtained from control treatment. Meanwhile the bioregulator treatments reduces the harmful effect of salinity on grain yield (g) plant-1. Paclobutrazol gave the best positive effect under the highest salinity level but proline at 20 ppm concentration gave the lowest positive effect on the grain yield (g) plant-1 under the highest salinity level. Some physiological parameters such as total chlorophyll, total soluble sugars , free amino acids , indoles , phenols , proline, K and Na contents in leaves were tested as a physiological markers of wheat plants grown under salt stress. The results showed that, the K/Na ratio and indole content in leaves could be used as physiological markers for wheat plants grown under salt stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NaCl without bioregulators increased wheat root/shoot ratio to fivefold the control at 6000 ppm.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Material
Sakha 8e0
Treatment
increasing NaCl levelse1
Outcome
root / shoot ratioe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5 folde1
Qualifier
at 6000 ppme1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“without bioregulators application, increasing NaCl levels increased root / shoot ratio to be 5 fold at 6000 ppm higher than control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–385 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioregulators decreased wheat root/shoot ratio under salt stress.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
bioregulatorse1
Outcome
root/ shoot ratioe1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
under salt stresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Adding the bioregulators obviously decreased the root/ shoot ratio under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–472 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the highest salinity, wheat grain yield per plant was around fourteen times lower than the control.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
highest level of salinitye1
Outcome
grain yield (g) plant-1e1
Direction
lowere1
Value
14 timese1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“the highest level of salinity caused a decrease of grain yield (g) plant-1 around 14 times lower than that obtained from control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–699 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioregulator treatments reduced the harmful effect of salinity on wheat grain yield per plant.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
bioregulator treatmentse1
Outcome
harmful effect of salinity on grain yield (g) plant-1e1
Direction
reducese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“the bioregulator treatments reduces the harmful effect of salinity on grain yield (g) plant-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paclobutrazol gave the best positive grain yield effect under the highest salinity.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Paclobutrazole1
Outcome
grain yield (g) plant-1e1
Direction
best positive effecte1
Qualifier
under the highest salinity levele1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Paclobutrazol gave the best positive effect under the highest salinity level but proline at 20 ppm concentration gave the lowest positive effect on the grain yield (g) plant-1 under the highest salinity level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline at 20 ppm gave the lowest positive grain yield effect under the highest salinity.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
proline at 20 ppme1
Outcome
grain yield (g) plant-1e1
Direction
lowest positive effecte1
Qualifier
under the highest salinity levele1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“Paclobutrazol gave the best positive effect under the highest salinity level but proline at 20 ppm concentration gave the lowest positive effect on the grain yield (g) plant-1 under the highest salinity level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1014 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf K/Na ratio could serve as a physiological marker for salt-stressed wheat.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0e1
Outcome
K/Na ratioe1
Qualifier
grown under salt stresse1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“the K/Na ratio and indole content in leaves could be used as physiological markers for wheat plants grown under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1400 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf indole content could serve as a physiological marker for salt-stressed wheat.

Taxon
Wheat plantsTriticum aestivume0e1
Outcome
indole contente1
Qualifier
grown under salt stresse1

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat plants (Triticm aestirvum L.cv. Sakha 8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–46 · show in text ↑
e1

“the K/Na ratio and indole content in leaves could be used as physiological markers for wheat plants grown under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1400 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sodium chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

137 papers: 24 positive, 113 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

proline · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

salinity · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 30 positive, 197 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.