Paper · 2020 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)

CRITICAL PERIOD OF PALMER AMARANTH REMOVAL AND EFFECTS OF LATE SEASON HERBICIDE APPLICATIONS ON PALMER AMARANTH SEED PRODUCTION

Jose de Sanctis

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Palmer amaranth is the most troublesome weed in agronomic crops in United States. Therefore, an integrated weed management approach is necessary to successfully manage this weed. The use of residual pre-emergence (PRE) herbicide applied at planting can delays the is one of the critical time of Palmer amaranth removal (CTPAR) giving farmers more time to prepare the weed control tactics and to preventing an unacceptable yield loss in soybean due to Palmer amaranth competition. Field experiments were conducted in 2018 and 2019 in a grower’s field infested with GR Palmer amaranth near Carleton, Nebraska, to determine the CTPAR in soybean affected by residual pre-emergence (PRE) herbicides compared with the no PRE herbicide in southcentral Nebraska. Results demonstrated that ). In absence of a PRE herbicide, the CTPAR at 5% soybean yield loss occurred at V1 and V6 soybean growth stages, in 2018 and 2019, respectively. When flumioxazin was applied alone, the CTPAR was delayed until V3 and V6 soybean growth stages compared with V2 and R1 soybean growth stages when the flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone premix was applied, in 2018 and 2019, respectively. Late-emerged Palmer amaranth plants and plants that survived POST applications are usually ignored by weed management programs based on yield loss once they normally do not cause an unacceptable yield loss. However, those plants can grow and produce seed, thus, replenishing the soil seedbank and increasing the chances for evolution of herbicide-resistant biotypes. Field experiments were conducted in a grower’s field infested with GR Palmer amaranth near Carleton, NE, in 2018 and 2019 to evaluate the effects of single or sequential late season applications of labeled POST herbicides such as acifluorfen, dicamba, fomesafen/fluthiacet-methyl, glyphosate, and lactofen on GR Palmer amaranth control, density, biomass, seed production, and fecundity as well as grain yield of dicamba/glyphosate-resistant (DGR) soybean. Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGS provided 86% to 97% control, reduced Palmer amaranth seed production in the range of 557 to 2,911 seeds per female plant and secured the highest soybean yield during both years of the study. Advisor: Amit J. Jhala

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without PRE herbicide, 5% soybean yield loss occurred at V1 in 2018 and V6 in 2019.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
absence of a PRE herbicidee0
Interactor
PALMER AMARANTHt0weed
Outcome
CTPAR at 5% soybean yield losse0
Value
V1 and V6 soybean growth stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In absence of a PRE herbicide, the CTPAR at 5% soybean yield loss occurred at V1 and V6 soybean growth stages, in 2018 and 2019, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“CRITICAL PERIOD OF PALMER AMARANTH REMOVAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flumioxazin alone delayed the critical removal period to V3 in 2018 and V6 in 2019.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
flumioxazine0
Interactor
PALMER AMARANTHt0weed
Outcome
CTPARe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
V3 and V6 soybean growth stagese0
Comparator
flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone premixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When flumioxazin was applied alone, the CTPAR was delayed until V3 and V6 soybean growth stages compared with V2 and R1 soybean growth stages when the flumioxazin/metribuzin/pyroxasulfone premix was applied, in 2018 and 2019, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“CRITICAL PERIOD OF PALMER AMARANTH REMOVAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba at V4 or sequentially at V4 followed by R1 or R3 controlled Palmer amaranth by 86% to 97%.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGSe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
controle0
Value
86% to 97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGS provided 86% to 97% control, reduced Palmer amaranth seed production in the range of 557 to 2,911 seeds per female plant and secured the highest soybean yield during both years of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dicamba applications reduced Palmer amaranth seed production to 557 to 2,911 seeds per female plant.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGSe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
Palmer amaranth seed productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
557 to 2,911 seeds per female plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGS provided 86% to 97% control, reduced Palmer amaranth seed production in the range of 557 to 2,911 seeds per female plant and secured the highest soybean yield during both years of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The dicamba applications secured the highest soybean yield across both years.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGSe0
Interactor
Palmer amaranthe0weed
Outcome
soybean yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba applied at V4 soybean growth stage (SGS) or in sequential applications at V4 followed by R1 or R3 SGS provided 86% to 97% control, reduced Palmer amaranth seed production in the range of 557 to 2,911 seeds per female plant and secured the highest soybean yield during both years of the study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1990–2290 · show in text ↑

dicamba · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

49 papers: 11 positive, 38 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

dicamba · control · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 27 positive, 4 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

flumioxazin · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

stage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 71 positive, 50 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 50 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.