Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Integrated Nutrient and Weed-Management Practices on Productivity and Profitability in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Dinesh Kumar Vivek, Satendra Kumar; Virendra Kumar

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2009–10 and 2010–11 at Meerut, Uttar Pradesh, to study the effect of different herbicides and nutrient management practices on weeds and productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). In this experiment, 4 nutrient levels viz.; control (No NPK), 50% NPK + FYM 15 t /ha, 75 % NPK + FYM 10 t /ha and 100 % NPK and 5 weed control measures viz.; Pendimethalin 1.0 kg /ha, Fenoxaprop + metsulfuron-methyl (100 + 4 g/ha), Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha), two hand weeding (25 & 45 DAS) and weedy check. Combined application of 75 % NPK and farmyard manure10 t /ha significantly improved wheat yield and soil nutrient status. The highest grain and straw yields were recorded with application of 75 % NPK + FYM 10 t /ha, which was at par with 100% NPK. Farmyard manure acts as a nutrient reservoir and releases nutrients slowly expected to be more closely matched with supply and demand by the crop. Among the weed control treatments gave significantly higher grain yield compared to weedy check. The highest grain yield were obtained from two hand weeding treatment, although this remained statistically at par with Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha) and both the treatments resulted in an increase of grain yield as compared to weedy check respectively. The highest net returns and benefit:cost ratio were obtained with application Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha) among the tested herbicide treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 75% NPK and farmyard manure significantly improved wheat yield.

Treatment
75 % NPK and farmyard manure10 t /hae0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 75 % NPK and farmyard manure10 t /ha significantly improved wheat yield and soil nutrient status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined 75% NPK and manure significantly improved soil nutrient status.

Treatment
75 % NPK and farmyard manure10 t /hae0
Outcome
soil nutrient statuse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined application of 75 % NPK and farmyard manure10 t /ha significantly improved wheat yield and soil nutrient status.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–667 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

75% NPK plus FYM 10 t/ha gave highest grain and straw yields, statistically comparable to 100% NPK.

Treatment
75 % NPK + FYM 10 t /hae0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
100% NPKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and straw yields were recorded with application of 75 % NPK + FYM 10 t /ha, which was at par with 100% NPK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control treatments yielded significantly more grain than the weedy check.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the weed control treatments gave significantly higher grain yield compared to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave the highest grain yield.

Treatment
two hand weeding treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield were obtained from two hand weeding treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield after two hand weedings was statistically at par with fenoxaprop plus carfentrazone.

Treatment
two hand weedinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield were obtained from two hand weeding treatment, although this remained statistically at par with Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1038–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop plus carfentrazone produced the highest net returns among tested herbicide treatments.

Treatment
Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha)e0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
tested herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net returns and benefit:cost ratio were obtained with application Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha) among the tested herbicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop plus carfentrazone produced the highest benefit:cost ratio among tested herbicides.

Treatment
Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha)e0
Outcome
benefit:cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
tested herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net returns and benefit:cost ratio were obtained with application Fenoxaprop + carfentrazone (100 +10 g/ha) among the tested herbicide treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1304–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–92 · show in text ↑

carfentrazone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
    The tank mixture increased wheat seed yield over the listed other treatments.

    Bioefficacy of Fenoxaprop, Clodinafop, Metribuzin Alone and in Combination Against Weeds in Wheatand their Residual Effect on Succeeding Crops · 2005 · compared with sole application of clodinafop and fenoxaprop, tank mix of metribuzin and isoproturon with carfentrazone and metsulfuron

    Same direction

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.