Paper · 2021 · Bulletin of the National Research Centre/Bulletin of the National Research Center

Attenuation of negative effects of saline stress in wheat plant by chitosan and calcium carbonate

Mervat Sh. Sadak; Iman M. Talaat

20
claims
30
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Chitosan and Ca + are natural signal molecules that can be used in agriculture as biostimulants and elicitors. They enhance different physiological responses and mitigate the negative effects of salinity. So, this investigation was done to study the effect of soaking wheat grains in chitosan and CaCO 3 (20 and 40 mg/L) on alleviating the adverse effect of salinity stress (0.0 and 5000 mg/L) on growth, some biochemical and physiological and yields of wheat plant. Results Shoot length (cm), leaves no/tiller, shoot dry weight (g), root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g) were significantly decreased as a result of salt stress. Soaking wheat grains in Chitosan or CaCO 3 significantly promoted plant growth under normal and stressed conditions. Irrigation of wheat plants with saline water significantly decreased photosynthetic pigments ( Chlo - a , Chlo - b , carotenoids and total pigments) in addition to Chlo-a / Chlo - b ratio, indole acetic acid content in the plant leaves. Meanwhile, saline water significantly increased phenolics, total soluble sugars (TSS) and proline content. H 2 O 2 and lipid peroxidation expressed by malondialdehyde (MDA) content clearly showed significant increases under salinity stress compared with untreated control. Soaking wheat grains in chitosan or CaCO 3 before sawing significantly increased the accumulation of H 2 O 2 and MDA in the leaves of wheat plants. Treatment of wheat grains with chitosan or CaCO 3 significantly promoted the activity of various antioxidant enzymes (SOD and POX) as compared to the control. CAT activity was significantly decreased as a result of chitosan or CaCO 3 treatments. The highest CAT activity was recorded in plants irrigated with 5000 mg/L saline water followed by control plants which recoded 36.40 and 24.82 U/min/g FW, respectively. On the other hand, irrigation of wheat plants with 5000 mg/L saline water significantly decreased spike length (cm), spikelets no/spike, grains wt/plant (g), 1000-grains wt (g), yield and biomass/plant (g) as well as, carbohydrate % and protein % compared with the control. However, treating wheat plants either with Chitosan or calcium carbonate resulted in obvious significant increases in carbohydrates and protein contents, especially in plants treated with 40 mg/L chitosan followed by 40 mg/L calcium carbonate. Soaking wheat grains in chitosan, especially at 40 mg/L, exhibited the strongest scavenging potential (2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate assay (DPPH%) followed by treatment with 40 mg/L CaCO 3 . Conclusion In conclusion, the used treatment enhanced the protective parameters such as antioxidant enzymes, total phenols and free radical scavengers and consequently helped the plants to decrease lipid peroxidation, increased their tolerance and improved yield and spike quality. Application of 40 mg/L chitosan recorded the highest increment in the scavenging ability of the natural antioxidants of the plant extract toward the stable free radical DPPH.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly decreased shoot length, leaf number, shoot dry mass and root fresh and dry mass.

Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
Shoot length (cm), leaves no/tiller, shoot dry weight (g), root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot length (cm), leaves no/tiller, shoot dry weight (g), root fresh weight (g) and root dry weight (g) were significantly decreased as a result of salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–656 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan soaking significantly promoted wheat growth under normal and salt conditions.

Treatment
Chitosane0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking wheat grains in Chitosan or CaCO 3 significantly promoted plant growth under normal and stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCO 3 soaking significantly promoted wheat growth under normal and salt conditions.

Treatment
CaCO 3e0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking wheat grains in Chitosan or CaCO 3 significantly promoted plant growth under normal and stressed conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation significantly decreased photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll ratio.

Treatment
saline watere0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments ( Chlo - a , Chlo - b , carotenoids and total pigments) in addition to Chlo-a / Chlo - b ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation of wheat plants with saline water significantly decreased photosynthetic pigments ( Chlo - a , Chlo - b , carotenoids and total pigments) in addition to Chlo-a / Chlo - b ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–961 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation significantly decreased leaf indole acetic acid.

Organ / stage
plant leavese0
Treatment
saline watere0
Outcome
indole acetic acid contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“saline water significantly decreased photosynthetic pigments ( Chlo - a , Chlo - b , carotenoids and total pigments) in addition to Chlo-a / Chlo - b ratio, indole acetic acid content in the plant leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline water increased phenolics, soluble sugars and proline.

Treatment
saline watere0
Outcome
phenolics, total soluble sugars (TSS) and proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“saline water significantly increased phenolics, total soluble sugars (TSS) and proline content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity significantly increased H 2 O 2 and MDA relative to untreated control.

Treatment
salinity stresse0
Outcome
H 2 O 2 and lipid peroxidation expressed by malondialdehyde (MDA) contente0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“H 2 O 2 and lipid peroxidation expressed by malondialdehyde (MDA) content clearly showed significant increases under salinity stress compared with untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan soaking increased leaf H 2 O 2 and MDA.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
accumulation of H 2 O 2 and MDAe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking wheat grains in chitosan or CaCO 3 before sawing significantly increased the accumulation of H 2 O 2 and MDA in the leaves of wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCO 3 soaking increased leaf H 2 O 2 and MDA.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
CaCO 3e0
Outcome
accumulation of H 2 O 2 and MDAe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking wheat grains in chitosan or CaCO 3 before sawing significantly increased the accumulation of H 2 O 2 and MDA in the leaves of wheat plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1431 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased SOD and POX activity versus control.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
activity of various antioxidant enzymes (SOD and POX)e0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of wheat grains with chitosan or CaCO 3 significantly promoted the activity of various antioxidant enzymes (SOD and POX) as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCO 3 increased SOD and POX activity versus control.

Treatment
CaCO 3e0
Outcome
activity of various antioxidant enzymes (SOD and POX)e0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of wheat grains with chitosan or CaCO 3 significantly promoted the activity of various antioxidant enzymes (SOD and POX) as compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1590 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan significantly reduced CAT activity.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT activity was significantly decreased as a result of chitosan or CaCO 3 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaCO 3 significantly reduced CAT activity.

Treatment
CaCO 3e0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CAT activity was significantly decreased as a result of chitosan or CaCO 3 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1677 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity was 36.40 U/min/g FW under saline irrigation.

Treatment
5000 mg/L saline watere0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Value
36.40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest CAT activity was recorded in plants irrigated with 5000 mg/L saline water followed by control plants which recoded 36.40 and 24.82 U/min/g FW, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity was 24.82 U/min/g FW in controls.

Material
control plantse0
Outcome
CAT activitye0
Value
24.82 U/min/g FWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest CAT activity was recorded in plants irrigated with 5000 mg/L saline water followed by control plants which recoded 36.40 and 24.82 U/min/g FW, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation significantly reduced spike and yield traits.

Treatment
5000 mg/L saline watere0
Outcome
spike length (cm), spikelets no/spike, grains wt/plant (g), 1000-grains wt (g), yield and biomass/plant (g)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation of wheat plants with 5000 mg/L saline water significantly decreased spike length (cm), spikelets no/spike, grains wt/plant (g), 1000-grains wt (g), yield and biomass/plant (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–2052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline irrigation significantly reduced carbohydrate and protein percentages.

Treatment
5000 mg/L saline watere0
Outcome
carbohydrate % and protein %e0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation of wheat plants with 5000 mg/L saline water significantly decreased spike length (cm), spikelets no/spike, grains wt/plant (g), 1000-grains wt (g), yield and biomass/plant (g) as well as, carbohydrate % and protein % compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1866–2120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan increased carbohydrate and protein contents, particularly at 40 mg/L.

Treatment
40 mg/L chitosane0
Outcome
carbohydrates and protein contentse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat plants either with Chitosan or calcium carbonate resulted in obvious significant increases in carbohydrates and protein contents, especially in plants treated with 40 mg/L chitosan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium carbonate increased carbohydrate and protein contents, particularly at 40 mg/L.

Treatment
40 mg/L calcium carbonatee0
Outcome
carbohydrates and protein contentse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat plants either with Chitosan or calcium carbonate resulted in obvious significant increases in carbohydrates and protein contents, especially in plants treated with 40 mg/L chitosan followed by 40 mg/L calcium carbonate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2130–2364 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 mg/L chitosan gave the greatest DPPH scavenging ability, followed by 40 mg/L calcium carbonate.

Treatment
40 mg/L chitosane0
Outcome
scavenging ability of the natural antioxidantse0
Direction
highest incremente0
Comparator
40 mg/L CaCO 3e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 40 mg/L chitosan recorded the highest increment in the scavenging ability of the natural antioxidants of the plant extract toward the stable free radical DPPH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2847–3021 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“40 mg/L CaCO 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2548–2562 · show in text ↑

calcium carbonate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chitosan · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

calcium carbonate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chitosan · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

chitosan · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salinity · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

19 papers: 7 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 10 positive, 73 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

87 papers: 19 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

83 papers more in this group

See all 87 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.