Paper · 2021 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Use of auxin to delay ripening: sensory and biochemical evaluation of Cabernet Sauvignon and Shiraz

C. Böttcher; T.E. Johnson; C.A. Burbidge; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
13
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background and Aims Climate change is prompting earlier grape ripening and harvest compression causing quality and logistical problems for growers and winemakers. Application of 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) offers a management tool to delay ripening and expand the harvest window. This study extends previous findings about the effect of NAA on Shiraz fruit and wine composition and provides the first analysis of NAA-induced ripening delay of Cabernet Sauvignon. Methods and Results Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes delayed harvest maturity by 3–4 weeks. Modification of nutrient accumulation was minor, and wines made from NAA and Control fruit displayed no significant variation in basic chemical properties. The concentration of methoxypyrazine in NAA-treated Cabernet Sauvignon grapes was unaffected, whereas NAA-treated Shiraz fruit and wine contained an elevated concentration of rotundone. The overall difference in wine volatile profiles between NAA and Control was small for both cultivars, reflected by Rate-All-That-Apply assessments that found no (Cabernet Sauvignon) or few (Shiraz) sensory attributes distinguishing the wines. Conclusions Application of NAA delays winegrape ripening with small, cultivar-dependent effects on grape and wine composition, that are unlikely to negatively affect wine sensory perception. Significance of the Study This work further establishes NAA as a ripening-delay agent that could be used commercially to delay grape maturation and decompress harvest while preserving berry integrity and wine typicity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz grapes delayed harvest maturity by 3-4 weeks.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Shiraze0
Treatment
Pre-veraison NAA treatmente0
Outcome
harvest maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3–4 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes delayed harvest maturity by 3–4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes delayed harvest maturity by 3-4 weeks.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone0
Treatment
Pre-veraison NAA treatmente0
Outcome
harvest maturitye0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3–4 weekse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes delayed harvest maturity by 3–4 weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–591 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modification of nutrient accumulation by NAA treatment was minor.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Pre-veraison NAA treatmente0
Outcome
nutrient accumulatione1
Direction
minore1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“Modification of nutrient accumulation was minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wines made from NAA-treated and Control fruit showed no significant variation in basic chemical properties.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
NAAe1
Outcome
basic chemical propertiese1
Direction
no significant variatione1
Comparator
Controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“wines made from NAA and Control fruit displayed no significant variation in basic chemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–747 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methoxypyrazine concentration in NAA-treated Cabernet Sauvignon grapes was unaffected.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
NAA-treatede1
Outcome
concentration of methoxypyrazinee1
Direction
unaffectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“The concentration of methoxypyrazine in NAA-treated Cabernet Sauvignon grapes was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NAA-treated Shiraz fruit and wine contained an elevated concentration of rotundone.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Shiraze1
Treatment
NAA-treatede1
Outcome
concentration of rotundonee1
Direction
elevatede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“NAA-treated Shiraz fruit and wine contained an elevated concentration of rotundone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The overall difference in wine volatile profiles between NAA and Control was small for both cultivars.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
NAAe1
Outcome
difference in wine volatile profilese1
Direction
smalle1
Comparator
Controle1

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“The overall difference in wine volatile profiles between NAA and Control was small for both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate-All-That-Apply assessments found no sensory attributes distinguishing NAA and Control Cabernet Sauvignon wines.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Cabernet Sauvignone1
Treatment
Pre-veraison NAA treatmente0
Outcome
sensory attributes distinguishing the winese1
Direction
noe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“found no (Cabernet Sauvignon) or few (Shiraz) sensory attributes distinguishing the wines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rate-All-That-Apply assessments found few sensory attributes distinguishing NAA and Control Shiraz wines.

Taxon
grapese0
Material
Shiraze1
Treatment
Pre-veraison NAA treatmente0
Outcome
sensory attributes distinguishing the winese1
Direction
fewe1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“found no (Cabernet Sauvignon) or few (Shiraz) sensory attributes distinguishing the wines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the NAA-induced effects are unlikely to negatively affect wine sensory perception.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
Pre-veraison NAA treatmente0
Outcome
wine sensory perceptione1
Direction
unlikely to negatively affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Pre-veraison NAA treatment of Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–553 · show in text ↑
e1

“unlikely to negatively affect wine sensory perception”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1368 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.