Paper · 2017 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Improve the Yield and Quality of Red Roomy and Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars

Fatma El-Zahraa; A Gouda; R Ibrahim; et al.

19
claims
44
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments were carried out at the Experimental Orchard of Assiut University, Faculty of Agriculture. The experiments aimed to overcome the looseness of berries as well as improving the yield and berry quality of Red Roomy grape cultivar by using Boron, Zinc and NAA. The study also aimed to reduce the cluster compactness by using GA3 and cluster thinning in order to improve the quality of Thompson Seedless grape cultivar. The treatments significantly increased the initial fruit set (IFS) and decreased the berry drop percentage. The cluster numbers not significantly affected by various treatments. However, the treatments increased the yield over the control. The control vines gave the lowest yield among all the treatments. The present study showed that there were no significant differences between treatments on the cluster width. On the other hand, treatments exhibited significant differences comparing with the control in respect of the cluster height. The treatments except of spraying with NAA had significant differences comparing with the control in respect of the cluster weight. However, the control vines gave the lowest cluster weight during the two studied seasons. On the contrary, the control gave the highest weight of 100 berries. On the other hand, although the control produced the highest juice weight of 100 berries but the differences were not significant during the two seasons of study. There were no significant differences between the treatments in respect of TSS% during the two studied seasons. The sugar contents took the same trend of TSS%. On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the treatments on the cluster number per vine of Thompson seedless grape cultivar. Yield weight significantly affected by GA3 application. The lowest yield obtained from the control. Data revealed that spraying the cluster with GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppm gave the highest values of cluster width (cm) and height (cm). The clusters treated with GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppm were the heaviest clusters among all the treatments and the differences between their values and the values of other treatments were significant during the two seasons of study. The weight of 100 berries and 100 berreis juice weight took the same trend of cluster weight. On the contrary of the previous results, the control and cluster thinning followed by GA3 at 5 ppm + thinning had the highest TSS% in the berry juice. Concerning the acidity percentage, the differences between the treatments mostly insignificant. GA3 application recorded also the least ratio of TSS/acid ratio, however, the other treatments significantly surpassed it in this respect. Cluster thinning gave the highest percentage of total sugars followed by GA3 at 5 ppm + thinning and then the control. This study concluded that the beneficial effects of spraying boron and zinc during flowering to increase the berry set and decrease berry drop of Red Roomy grape cultivar. On the other hand; Gibberellic acid (GA3) spraying increased berry size, cluster weight and expand the cluster length of Thompson Seedless grape cultivar that suffering from cluster compactness. Cluster thinning can be used for increasing berry and cluster weight and improving the quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron, zinc and NAA treatments significantly increased initial fruit set in Red Roomy grape

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Boron, Zinc and NAAe2
Outcome
initial fruit sete1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatments significantly increased the initial fruit set (IFS) and decreased the berry drop percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–533 · show in text ↑
e2

“by using Boron, Zinc and NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron, zinc and NAA treatments significantly decreased berry drop percentage in grape

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Boron, Zinc and NAAe2
Outcome
berry drop percentagee1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatments significantly increased the initial fruit set (IFS) and decreased the berry drop percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–533 · show in text ↑
e2

“by using Boron, Zinc and NAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster numbers were not significantly affected by the various treatments

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
various treatmentse1
Outcome
cluster numberse1
Direction
not significantly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cluster numbers not significantly affected by various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments increased grape yield over the control

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, the treatments increased the yield over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences between treatments on cluster width

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
cluster widthe1
Direction
no significant differencese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The present study showed that there were no significant differences between treatments on the cluster width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments showed significant differences in cluster height compared with the control

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
cluster heighte1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments exhibited significant differences comparing with the control in respect of the cluster height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments other than NAA spraying had significant differences in cluster weight compared with the control

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
cluster weighte1
Qualifier
except of spraying with NAAe1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatments except of spraying with NAA had significant differences comparing with the control in respect of the cluster weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1097 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control vines had the highest weight of 100 berries

Taxon
Grapet0
Outcome
weight of 100 berriese1
Direction
higheste1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the contrary, the control gave the highest weight of 100 berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1256 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Control had the highest juice weight of 100 berries, but the differences were not significant

Taxon
Grapet0
Outcome
juice weight of 100 berriese1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
the differences were not significant during the two seasons of studye1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control produced the highest juice weight of 100 berries but the differences were not significant during the two seasons of study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1286–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences between treatments in TSS% of grape juice

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
the treatmentse1
Outcome
TSS%e1
Direction
no significant differencese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no significant differences between the treatments in respect of TSS% during the two studied seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences between treatments in cluster number per vine of Thompson Seedless

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
Thompson seedlesse1
Treatment
the treatmentse1
Outcome
cluster number per vinee1
Direction
no significant differencese1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“there were no significant differences between the treatments on the cluster number per vine of Thompson seedless grape cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1600–1727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application significantly affected yield weight of Thompson Seedless grape, with the lowest yield in the control

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3 applicatione1
Outcome
Yield weighte1
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield weight significantly affected by GA3 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1783 · show in text ↑
e2

“The lowest yield obtained from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1827 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying clusters with GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppm gave the highest cluster width and height

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppme1
Outcome
cluster width (cm) and height (cm)e1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“spraying the cluster with GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppm gave the highest values of cluster width (cm) and height (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1958 · show in text ↑
e2

“the values of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2106–2136 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control and cluster thinning followed by GA3 at 5 ppm + thinning had the highest TSS% in grape berry juice

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
cluster thinning followed by GA3 at 5 ppm + thinninge1
Outcome
TSS% in the berry juicee1
Direction
higheste1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“the control and cluster thinning followed by GA3 at 5 ppm + thinning had the highest TSS% in the berry juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2322–2430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidity percentage differences between treatments were mostly insignificant

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
treatmentse1
Outcome
acidity percentagee1
Direction
mostly insignificante1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the acidity percentage, the differences between the treatments mostly insignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2432–2526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 application gave the least TSS/acid ratio, below the other treatments

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3 applicatione1
Outcome
TSS/acid ratioe1
Direction
leaste1
Comparator
other treatmentse2

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA3 application recorded also the least ratio of TSS/acid ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2528–2591 · show in text ↑
e2

“the other treatments significantly surpassed it in this respect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2602–2665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster thinning gave the highest percentage of total sugars, above GA3 at 5 ppm + thinning and the control

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Cluster thinninge1
Outcome
percentage of total sugarse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
the controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cluster thinning gave the highest percentage of total sugars followed by GA3 at 5 ppm + thinning and then the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2667–2784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppm gave the heaviest clusters among all treatments, with significant weight differences from other treatments

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppme1
Outcome
cluster weighte2
Direction
heavieste1
Comparator
all the treatmentse1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“The clusters treated with GA3 at 5 + 20 + 30 ppm were the heaviest clusters among all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2060 · show in text ↑
e2

“in respect of the cluster weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1097 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster thinning can be used to increase berry and cluster weight and improve quality

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Cluster thinninge1
Outcome
berry and cluster weighte1
Direction
increasinge1

Verbatim

t0

“Thompson Seedless Grape Cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cluster thinning can be used for increasing berry and cluster weight and improving the quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3153–3247 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · VitisResults differ

34 papers: 26 positive, 8 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

boron atom · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · yield · VitisResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

zinc atom · yield · VitisResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.