Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Exogenously Applied Proline Modulates Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L)

Shamim Akram; Mohammad Golam Kibria; Yoshiyuki Murata; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improving drought stress tolerance in maize is essential to increase its production and yield worldwide. Thus, the present study was conducted to investigate the improvement of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) by exogenous application of proline (25 and 50mM) on two maize varieties. Maize plants were subjected to drought stress at various phases of plant growth under pot culture conditions and proline was applied as foliar spray. Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease (by approximately 25%) in growth and yield of both maize varieties by decreasing plant height, cob length, dry root weight, grains per cob and 100-grain weight. Water deficit stress also decreased chlorophyll and intercellular proline contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities viz. catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (POX) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX). Exogenous application of proline (50 mM) was found to be more effective in increasing growth and yield of both varieties. These increases were positively associated with increased levels (by at least 15%) of chlorophyll and intracellular proline, and enhanced activities of CAT, POX and APX enzymes in both varieties. Interaction effects of exogenous proline and water deficit stress were significant in aspects of higher growth and yields and enhanced levels of chlorophyll, intracellular proline and antioxidant enzyme activities. Therefore, it is concluded that foliar application of proline improves drought tolerance by modulating chlorophyll and intracellular proline contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased maize growth and yield by approximately 25%, including height, cob length, root dry weight, grains per cob and 100-grain weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Water deficit stresse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
approximately 25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease (by approximately 25%) in growth and yield of both maize varieties by decreasing plant height, cob length, dry root weight, grains per cob and 100-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased chlorophyll and intercellular proline contents.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Water deficit stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll and intercellular proline contentse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit stress also decreased chlorophyll and intercellular proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased CAT, POX and APX antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Water deficit stresse0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activities viz. catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (POX) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit stress also decreased chlorophyll and intercellular proline contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities viz. catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (POX) and ascorbate peroxidase (APX)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar proline at 50 mM was more effective in increasing growth and yield in both varieties.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Exogenous application of proline (50 mM)e0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenous application of proline (50 mM) was found to be more effective in increasing growth and yield of both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth and yield increases were associated with at least 15% higher chlorophyll and intracellular proline.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
prolinet0
Outcome
chlorophyll and intracellular prolinee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
at least 15%e0
Qualifier
These increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These increases were positively associated with increased levels (by at least 15%) of chlorophyll and intracellular proline”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Exogenously Applied Proline Modulates Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increases were associated with enhanced CAT, POX and APX activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
prolinet0
Outcome
activities of CAT, POX and APX enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These increases were positively associated with increased levels (by at least 15%) of chlorophyll and intracellular proline, and enhanced activities of CAT, POX and APX enzymes in both varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Exogenously Applied Proline Modulates Drought Tolerance in Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and water deficit interacted significantly for higher growth and yields.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
exogenous proline and water deficit stresse0
Outcome
growth and yieldse0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of exogenous proline and water deficit stress were significant in aspects of higher growth and yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1290 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and water deficit interacted significantly for enhanced chlorophyll, intracellular proline and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
exogenous proline and water deficit stresse0
Outcome
levels of chlorophyll, intracellular proline and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects of exogenous proline and water deficit stress were significant in aspects of higher growth and yields and enhanced levels of chlorophyll, intracellular proline and antioxidant enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar proline improves drought tolerance through chlorophyll, intracellular proline and antioxidant enzyme activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
foliar application of prolinee0
Outcome
drought tolerancee0
Qualifier
modulating chlorophyll and intracellular proline contents, and antioxidant enzyme activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of proline improves drought tolerance by modulating chlorophyll and intracellular proline contents, and antioxidant enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 · show in text ↑

proline · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

60 papers: 32 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 10 positive, 75 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

drought · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

353 papers: 53 positive, 300 negative or no effect

299 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

349 papers more in this group

See all 353 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.