Paper · 2017 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Management of wilt and root rots of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) using Trichoderma harzianum in India

S C DUBEY; BIRENDRA SINGH; O M GUPTA; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris), dry root rot (Rhizoctonia bataticola) and collar rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) are the major soil-borne diseases of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) prevalent across the country and causing substantial yield losses. Field experiments were conducted at eight different hot spot locations of these diseases belonging to six states namely, New Delhi (Delhi), Indore, Sehore and Jabalpur (Madhya Pradesh), Badnapur (Maharashtra), Junagadh (Gujarat), Samba (Jammu and Kashmir) and Durgapura (Rajasthan) to evaluate and validate the performance of Pusa 5SD (a novel seed dressing formulation developed from Trichoderma harzianum) alone and in combination with fungicide along with recommended fungicidal seed treatment against wilt and root rots of chickpea under AICRP Chickpea during 2010 to 2013 crop seasons. Seed treatment with Pusa 5SD (T. harzianum) alone and in combination with Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram) proved to be effective for the management of wilt and root rots at different locations. A combination of seed treatment with Pusa 5SD and Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram) provided the lowest disease incidence (12.2%) along with the highest grain yield (1053.3 kg/ha). Cardendazim (Bavistin) + Tetra methyl thiuram disulphide (thiram) and Vitavax power also reduced the diseases incidence (13.0%) and enhanced the grain yield (998.2 kg/ha) of chickpea. The bio-formulation Pusa 5SD showed effectiveness across the locations and varieties against wilt, dry root rot and collar rot of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa 5SD alone managed chickpea wilt and root rots across locations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pusa 5SD (T. harzianum) alonee0
Interactor
T. harzianumTrichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
wilt and root rotse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianum · InteractorUS Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, [1] · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with Pusa 5SD (T. harzianum) alone and in combination with Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram) proved to be effective for the management of wilt and root rots at different locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–1032 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa 5SD with Vitavax produced the lowest disease incidence, 12.2%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pusa 5SD and Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram)e0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
12.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of seed treatment with Pusa 5SD and Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram) provided the lowest disease incidence (12.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1163 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pusa 5SD with Vitavax produced the highest grain yield, 1053.3 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Pusa 5SD and Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1053.3 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of seed treatment with Pusa 5SD and Vitavax power (carboxin + thiram) provided the lowest disease incidence (12.2%) along with the highest grain yield (1053.3 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1213 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim-thiram and Vitavax treatments reduced disease incidence to 13.0%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Cardendazim (Bavistin) + Tetra methyl thiuram disulphide (thiram) and Vitavax powere0
Outcome
diseases incidencee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
13.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cardendazim (Bavistin) + Tetra methyl thiuram disulphide (thiram) and Vitavax power also reduced the diseases incidence (13.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1342 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–179 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbendazim-thiram and Vitavax treatments increased chickpea yield to 998.2 kg/ha.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Cardendazim (Bavistin) + Tetra methyl thiuram disulphide (thiram) and Vitavax powere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
998.2 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cardendazim (Bavistin) + Tetra methyl thiuram disulphide (thiram) and Vitavax power also reduced the diseases incidence (13.0%) and enhanced the grain yield (998.2 kg/ha) of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1397 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

carbendazim · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Trichoderma harzianum · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

methyl · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

methyl · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

693430 · disease · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

693430 · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

carboxin · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.