Paper · 2021 · EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS)

Physiological behavior of olive (Olea europaea L.) varieties under different foliage nutrition and irrigation regimes in the hyper-arid zone

Sherif EL-GİOUSHY; Ibrahim DOBİEA; Botir KHAİTOV; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Olive (Olea europaea) is an emblematic tree in the Mediterranean regions that grows an integral part of the area. The Mediterranean vegetation often undergoes challenging periods of severe drought stress, which causes significant impairment to olive trees' growth and production performance. The practical study was designed to follow up the effect of three irrigation regimes (50%, 75% and 100% ETc) in combination with four doses (0, 2, 4 and 6 g/L) of Lithovit (CaCO3+MgCO3, micronized calcium carbonate) on growth performance, yield, and fruit quality of two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties during 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. Regardless Lithovit doses, irrigation regime 100% of ETc exhibited the highest values of leaf water content, leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll and N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations of both olive varieties compared to the other watering regimes. Interestingly, proline content in the fruit was enhanced with increasing water deficit (50% of ETc) and Lithovit dose (6 g/L). However, the highest yield and fruit oil content were obtained by the combination of 75% ETc irrigation level and Lithovit treatment at a rate of 4 g/L in both olive varieties. This study contributes to developing olive production technologies, thereby ensuring sustainable olive culture farming with high-quality yield in hyper-arid zones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full ETc irrigation gave the highest leaf water content in both olive varieties.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
irrigation regime 100% of ETce0
Outcome
leaf water contente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other watering regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation regime 100% of ETc exhibited the highest values of leaf water content, leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll and N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations of both olive varieties compared to the other watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full ETc irrigation gave the highest leaf relative water content in both olive varieties.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
irrigation regime 100% of ETce0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other watering regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation regime 100% of ETc exhibited the highest values of leaf water content, leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll and N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations of both olive varieties compared to the other watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full ETc irrigation gave the highest total chlorophyll in both olive varieties.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
irrigation regime 100% of ETce0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other watering regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation regime 100% of ETc exhibited the highest values of leaf water content, leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll and N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations of both olive varieties compared to the other watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full ETc irrigation gave the highest N, P, and K concentrations in both olive varieties.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
irrigation regime 100% of ETce0
Outcome
N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other watering regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation regime 100% of ETc exhibited the highest values of leaf water content, leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll and N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations of both olive varieties compared to the other watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full ETc irrigation gave the highest Ca and Mg concentrations in both olive varieties.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
irrigation regime 100% of ETce0
Outcome
Ca and Mg concentrationse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other watering regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation regime 100% of ETc exhibited the highest values of leaf water content, leaf relative water content, total chlorophyll and N, P, K, Ca and Mg concentrations of both olive varieties compared to the other watering regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater water deficit enhanced olive fruit proline content.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
water deficit (50% of ETc)e0
Outcome
proline content in the fruite0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content in the fruit was enhanced with increasing water deficit (50% of ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing Lithovit dose to 6 g/L enhanced olive fruit proline content.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
Lithovit dose (6 g/L)e0
Outcome
proline content in the fruite0
Direction
enhancede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content in the fruit was enhanced with increasing water deficit (50% of ETc) and Lithovit dose (6 g/L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1024 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 75% ETc irrigation and 4 g/L Lithovit gave the highest olive yield.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
combination of 75% ETc irrigation level and Lithovit treatment at a rate of 4 g/Le0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield and fruit oil content were obtained by the combination of 75% ETc irrigation level and Lithovit treatment at a rate of 4 g/L in both olive varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1201 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of 75% ETc irrigation and 4 g/L Lithovit gave the highest olive fruit oil content.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeae1
Treatment
combination of 75% ETc irrigation level and Lithovit treatment at a rate of 4 g/Le0
Outcome
fruit oil contente0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest yield and fruit oil content were obtained by the combination of 75% ETc irrigation level and Lithovit treatment at a rate of 4 g/L in both olive varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1201 · show in text ↑
e1

“two olive (Picual and Manzanello) varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–602 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Olea europaea (common olive)Results differ

53 papers: 26 positive, 27 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

irrigation · physiology: pigments · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · quality: oil · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 15 positive, 16 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.