Paper · 2021 · Journal of Horticulture and Plant Research

Chilling-Requirement Release of Seed and Bud Dormancy in Apricot

Mohamed A. Seif El-Yazal; Samir A. Seif El-Yazal

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Dormancy shows common physiological features in buds and seeds. Specific period of chilling is usually required to release dormancy. Reproductive meristems and embryos display dormancy mechanisms in specialized structures named respectively buds and seeds that arrest the growth of perennial plants until environmental conditions are optimal for survival. Chilling requirements for breaking dormancy were studied for 3 successive years in 20 seedling apricot trees which spanned the range of flowering times in these trees. Different methods for estimating chilling requirements were evaluated and compared, and correlations between chilling requirements and flowering date were established. The trees examined showed a range of chilling requirements, chill hours (CH) between 199 CH and 274 CH, and chill units, (CU), between 612CU and 873CU. The results obtained in different years by the Utah and Dynamic models were more homogeneous with respect to the hours below 7 °C model. The apricot trees showed important differences concerning flowering date, and the results indicate a high positive correlation between chilling requirements and flowering date.Moreover, a specific low-temperature stratification treatment was required to overcome seed dormancy. 5°C cold stratification was found to be the best for breaking seed dormancy and germination. Increased seed germination percentage was recorded when the period of stratification prolonged. Apricot seeds required a cold stratification of about 12-15 days to reach maximum germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot trees varied in chilling requirement from 199 to 274 chill hours.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
chilling requirementse0
Value
199 CH and 274 CHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trees examined showed a range of chilling requirements, chill hours (CH) between 199 CH and 274 CH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot trees varied in chilling requirement from 612 to 873 chill units.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
chill unitse0
Value
612CU and 873CUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and chill units, (CU), between 612CU and 873CU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Utah and Dynamic model estimates were more homogeneous across years than hours below 7 °C estimates.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
results obtained in different yearse0
Direction
more homogeneouse0
Comparator
hours below 7 °C modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results obtained in different years by the Utah and Dynamic models were more homogeneous with respect to the hours below 7 °C model”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–979 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot chilling requirements were highly positively correlated with flowering date.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
flowering datee0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
chilling requirementse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the results indicate a high positive correlation between chilling requirements and flowering date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-temperature stratification was required to overcome apricot seed dormancy.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
low-temperature stratification treatmente0
Outcome
seed dormancye0
Direction
overcomee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a specific low-temperature stratification treatment was required to overcome seed dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stratification at 5°C was best for apricot seed dormancy breaking and germination.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
5°C cold stratificatione0
Outcome
breaking seed dormancy and germinatione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“5°C cold stratification was found to be the best for breaking seed dormancy and germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer stratification increased apricot seed germination percentage.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
period of stratificatione0
Outcome
seed germination percentagee0
Direction
Increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased seed germination percentage was recorded when the period of stratification prolonged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1446 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apricot seeds reached maximum germination after about 12-15 days of cold stratification.

Taxon
ApricotPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
cold stratification of about 12-15 dayse0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
12-15 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apricot seeds required a cold stratification of about 12-15 days to reach maximum germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1448–1541 · show in text ↑

cold · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.