Paper · 2021 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Development of deficit irrigation program for improving the water use efficiency, growth, and yield of groundnut in the semiarid tropical region of India

S. Sivarasan; R. Vijayalakshmi; V. Kumar; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, we assessed the efficiency of a deficit irrigation program (DIP) on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield and economic profits. The DIP was designed to combine frequency and volume of irrigation to develop an appropriate irrigation water management (IWM) strategy for groundnut. Two field experiments were conducted at the Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India, with a bunch variety of groundnut, VRI 2, under a randomized block design (RBD) with three replications. The treatments included DIP in combination with a foliar application of pink-pigmented facultative methylotrophic bacteria (PPFM). The irrigation frequencies adopted for the first set of treatments were high frequency (5/5), medium frequency (7/5), and lower frequency (7/7) starting from 14 days after sowing (DAS). The effects of early water stress on groundnut pod yield and water use efficiency were investigated in a second experiment by starting irrigation at 21 DAS. The number of irrigation frequencies and irrigation volume was fixed to develop an easily readable irrigation chart for end-users. The number of irrigation frequencies was fixed as three, and the volume of irrigation was fixed as a depth of 3 cm. In the first experiment, a mini mobile pumping unit was used for scheduling irrigation frequencies; in the second experiment, the surface drip method was used. In both experiments, we also assessed the effects of foliar application of PPFM, widely used as a growth stimulant for several crops, especially under drought conditions. Overall, we observed that DIP led to up to 25.6% water saving compared to surface irrigation. Use of the DIP at the medium frequency with PPFM spray had a significantly positive influence on water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) compared to conventional drip irrigation (CDI). Compared to surface irrigation (SI), DIP had a positive impact on growth parameters, yield attributes, and economic profitability with a higher benefit-cost ratio. Additionally, there were only minor differences between deficit irrigation (DI) results starting from 21 DAS and 14 DAS. Irrespective of the irrigation techniques, PPFM application had a positive effect on the yield attributes and WUE. Our results indicated that DI at a medium frequency (7/5) with PPFM spray, starting from 21 DAS under drip fertigation, is the best irrigation management innovation (IMI) strategy for optimum utilization of irrigation water without significant reduction in pod yield. This management had a positive influence on WUE and IWUE of summer groundnut in sandy clay loam soil. However, the exact scheduling of the irrigation may differ in different environments as well as soil types. Nevertheless, we propose that the application and further optimization of the DIP devised in this study would help the farmers attain a similar yield using a lower amount of irrigation water and lead to significant economic profits for the farmers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation saved up to 25.6% water versus surface irrigation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
DIPe0
Outcome
water savinge0
Direction
savinge0
Value
25.6%e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DIP led to up to 25.6% water saving compared to surface irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-frequency DIP with PPFM significantly improved WUE and IWUE versus conventional drip irrigation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
DIP at the medium frequency with PPFM spraye0
Interactor
PPFMe0other
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE)e0
Direction
positive influencee0
Comparator
conventional drip irrigation (CDI)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of the DIP at the medium frequency with PPFM spray had a significantly positive influence on water use efficiency (WUE) and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE) compared to conventional drip irrigation (CDI)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1875 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DIP improved groundnut growth parameters, yield attributes and economic profitability versus surface irrigation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
DIPe0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes, and economic profitabilitye0
Direction
positive impacte0
Qualifier
higher benefit-cost ratioe0
Comparator
surface irrigation (SI)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to surface irrigation (SI), DIP had a positive impact on growth parameters, yield attributes, and economic profitability with a higher benefit-cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–2039 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation beginning at 21 versus 14 DAS produced only minor differences.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
deficit irrigation (DI) results starting from 21 DASe0
Outcome
deficit irrigation (DI) resultse0
Direction
minor differencese0
Comparator
14 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were only minor differences between deficit irrigation (DI) results starting from 21 DAS and 14 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2055–2160 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PPFM application improved yield attributes and WUE across irrigation techniques.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
PPFM applicatione0
Interactor
PPFMe0other
Outcome
yield attributes and WUEe0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrespective of the irrigation techniques, PPFM application had a positive effect on the yield attributes and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2162–2275 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium-frequency DI with PPFM from 21 DAS under drip fertigation avoided a significant pod-yield reduction.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
DI at a medium frequency (7/5) with PPFM spray, starting from 21 DAS under drip fertigatione0
Interactor
PPFMe0other
Outcome
pod yielde0
Direction
without significant reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DI at a medium frequency (7/5) with PPFM spray, starting from 21 DAS under drip fertigation, is the best irrigation management innovation (IMI) strategy for optimum utilization of irrigation water without significant reduction in pod yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2304–2543 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

This management improved WUE and IWUE in summer groundnut on sandy clay loam soil.

Taxon
summer groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
This managemente0
Outcome
WUE and IWUEe0
Direction
positive influencee0
Setting
sandy clay loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This management had a positive influence on WUE and IWUE of summer groundnut in sandy clay loam soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2545–2645 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend medium-frequency DI with PPFM beginning at 21 DAS under drip fertigation.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
DI at a medium frequency (7/5) with PPFM spray, starting from 21 DAS under drip fertigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DI at a medium frequency (7/5) with PPFM spray, starting from 21 DAS under drip fertigation, is the best irrigation management innovation (IMI) strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2304–2456 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose further optimization of DIP to maintain yield with less irrigation water and improve profits.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
application and further optimization of the DIPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we propose that the application and further optimization of the DIP devised in this study would help the farmers attain a similar yield using a lower amount of irrigation water and lead to significant economic profits for the farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2769–3002 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–112 · show in text ↑

inoculation · physiology: water · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

in vitro · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

irrigation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

191 papers: 168 positive, 23 negative or no effect

167 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

187 papers more in this group

See all 191 papers →

inoculation · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

221 papers: 198 positive, 23 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

217 papers more in this group

See all 221 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

application · physiology: water · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.