Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Food Properties

Comparative study of nutritional properties and antioxidant activity of raw and fermented (black) garlic

Zunaira Tahir; Farhan Saeed; Farhana Nosheen; et al.

14
claims
41
verbatim quotes
43
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The core objective of this research work was to determine the nutritional and bioactive profile of raw and fermented (black) garlic. For this purpose, different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi were procured from local market of Faisalabad, Pakistan. In addition, desi raw garlic (DRG) and farmi raw garlic (FRG) were converted into desi fermented (black) garlic (DFG) and farmi fermented garlic (FFG) through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days. Moreover, nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of raw and fermented (black) garlic were also elucidated. Results showed that moisture content of garlic was rapidly reduced, whereas crude protein, crude fiber, crude ash, and carbohydrate contents were significantly improved after fermentation. In addition, protein contents of DRG and FRG garlic were 8.57 ± 0.21 and 6.38 ± 0.05 g/100 g whilst 9.5 ± 0.35 and 8.1 ± 0.06 g/100 g, in DFG and FFG, respectively, after fermentation. Additionally, carbohydrate contents were also increased up to 30–40% after fermentation. Mineral contents such as potassium, sulfur, aluminum, iron, sodium, magnesium, zinc, and copper were also increased after fermentation. Furthermore, garlic fermentation significantly reduced pH level. Antioxidant activity showed that total phenolic contents (TPC) of DRG & FRG were 2421.3 & 2128.5 mg GAE/kg while 2886.7, & 2529.8 mg GAE/kg for DFG and FFG, respectively. Total flavonoid contents of DRG and FRG were 124 & 101 mg RE/100 g, whereas DFG and FFG were 191 & 121mgRE/100 g. FRAP, DPPH, and ABTS values were higher in DRG and DFG as compared to FRG and FFG. Conclusively, fermented (black) garlic showed a higher nutritional profile, mineral content, as well as antioxidant activity as compared to raw garlic. C-1: Avoid % for concentration, use more clearly; for examples g/100 g raw materials, g/100 g dry-solids, g/100 g extract, g/100 g oil???) Check all???

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation rapidly reduced the moisture content of garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
moisture contente1
Direction
rapidly reducede1
Comparator
raw garlice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e1

“moisture content of garlic was rapidly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–674 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to raw garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1790 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation significantly improved the crude protein, crude fiber and crude ash contents of garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
crude protein, crude fiber, crude ashe4
Direction
significantly improvede4
Comparator
raw garlice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to raw garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1790 · show in text ↑
e4

“crude protein, crude fiber, crude ash, and carbohydrate contents were significantly improved after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbohydrate contents of garlic increased up to 30–40% after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
carbohydrate contentse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
30–40%e5
Comparator
raw garlice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to raw garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1790 · show in text ↑
e5

“carbohydrate contents were also increased up to 30–40% after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1069 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of desi garlic rose from 8.57 ± 0.21 g/100 g raw to 9.5 ± 0.35 g/100 g after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
desie0
Treatment
fermentatione6
Outcome
protein contentse6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
9.5 ± 0.35e6
Comparator
DRGe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e6

“protein contents of DRG and FRG garlic were 8.57 ± 0.21 and 6.38 ± 0.05 g/100 g whilst 9.5 ± 0.35 and 8.1 ± 0.06 g/100 g, in DFG and FFG, respectively, after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of farmi garlic rose from 6.38 ± 0.05 g/100 g raw to 8.1 ± 0.06 g/100 g after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
farmie0
Treatment
fermentatione6
Outcome
protein contentse6
Direction
increaseinferrede6
Value
8.1 ± 0.06e6
Comparator
FRGe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e6

“protein contents of DRG and FRG garlic were 8.57 ± 0.21 and 6.38 ± 0.05 g/100 g whilst 9.5 ± 0.35 and 8.1 ± 0.06 g/100 g, in DFG and FFG, respectively, after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–980 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation increased the potassium, sulfur and aluminum contents of garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
fermentatione7
Outcome
potassium, sulfur, aluminume7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
raw garlice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to raw garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1790 · show in text ↑
e7

“Mineral contents such as potassium, sulfur, aluminum, iron, sodium, magnesium, zinc, and copper were also increased after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation increased the iron, sodium and magnesium contents of garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
fermentatione7
Outcome
iron, sodium, magnesiume7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
raw garlice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to raw garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1790 · show in text ↑
e7

“Mineral contents such as potassium, sulfur, aluminum, iron, sodium, magnesium, zinc, and copper were also increased after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fermentation increased the zinc and copper contents of garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
fermentatione7
Outcome
zinc, and coppere7
Direction
increasede7
Comparator
raw garlice3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e3

“as compared to raw garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1790 · show in text ↑
e7

“Mineral contents such as potassium, sulfur, aluminum, iron, sodium, magnesium, zinc, and copper were also increased after fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic fermentation significantly reduced the pH level of garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Treatment
garlic fermentatione4
Outcome
pH levele4
Direction
significantly reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e4

“garlic fermentation significantly reduced pH level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content of desi garlic rose from 2421.3 mg GAE/kg raw to 2886.7 mg GAE/kg after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
desie0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
total phenolic contents (TPC)e4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
2886.7e4
Comparator
DRGe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e4

“total phenolic contents (TPC) of DRG & FRG were 2421.3 & 2128.5 mg GAE/kg while 2886.7, & 2529.8 mg GAE/kg for DFG and FFG, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content of farmi garlic rose from 2128.5 mg GAE/kg raw to 2529.8 mg GAE/kg after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
farmie0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
total phenolic contents (TPC)e4
Direction
increaseinferrede4
Value
2529.8e4
Comparator
FRGe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e4

“total phenolic contents (TPC) of DRG & FRG were 2421.3 & 2128.5 mg GAE/kg while 2886.7, & 2529.8 mg GAE/kg for DFG and FFG, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1305–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total flavonoid content of desi garlic rose from 124 mg RE/100 g raw to 191 mg RE/100 g after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
desie0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
Total flavonoid contentse5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
191e5
Comparator
DRGe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total flavonoid contents of DRG and FRG were 124 & 101 mg RE/100 g, whereas DFG and FFG were 191 & 121mgRE/100 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total flavonoid content of farmi garlic rose from 101 mg RE/100 g raw to 121 mg RE/100 g after fermentation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
farmie0
Treatment
fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 dayse2
Outcome
Total flavonoid contentse5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Value
121e5
Comparator
FRGe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e2

“through fermentation in incubator at 60°C and 70–80% humidity level for 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–489 · show in text ↑
e5

“Total flavonoid contents of DRG and FRG were 124 & 101 mg RE/100 g, whereas DFG and FFG were 191 & 121mgRE/100 g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1555 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FRAP, DPPH and ABTS antioxidant values were higher in desi garlic (raw and fermented) than in farmi garlic (raw and fermented).

Taxon
garlicAllium sativume0
Material
DRG and DFGe6
Outcome
FRAP, DPPH, and ABTS valuese6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
FRG and FFGe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“different varieties of garlic i.e., desi and farmi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–201 · show in text ↑
e6

“FRAP, DPPH, and ABTS values were higher in DRG and DFG as compared to FRG and FFG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1638 · show in text ↑

processing · nutrient: content · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

humidity · quality: phytochemicals · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

processing · quality: protein · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 7 positive, 9 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

processing · quality: sugar starch · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.