Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology

Biofortification: Effect of Zn and Fe application on wheat genotypes in Bangladesh

M R Khan; A A Mahmud A A Mahmud; M Jahiruddin; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Biofortification of zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) will be an important effort for the combat of malnutrition in Bangladesh. The experimental site was Bangladesh Agricultural University (BAU) farm to increase the Zn and Fe content in wheat grain. The design of the experiment was split-plot and replicated thrice. Ten varieties and seven advanced lines were tested under 3 treatments: control, Zn and Zn + Fe; for the study. For control plots, the grain Zn concentration varied from 20.3 – 30.5 µg g-1, across the genotypes, with the highest performance by advanced line BAW 917 and the lowest performance by variety Sufi. The average grain Zn concentration over the 17 genotypes was noted as 26.3 µg g-1. When Zn was applied to soil, the grain Zn concentration ranged from 29.1 - 40.9 µg g-1 with a mean of 34.2 µg g-1. The Fe content ranged from 20-35 µg g-1 with a mean of 30.5 µg g-1. The protein content also increases due to the Zn application. The Zn application increase the Zn content in grain as well as increase the yield with protein content. Among the genotype, there are some potential varieties for biofortification.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without fertilizer, grain zinc concentration varied across wheat genotypes from 20.3 to 30.5 µg g-1; BAW 917 was highest and Sufi lowest.

Material
BAW 917e0
Treatment
control plotse0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
20.3 – 30.5 µg g-1e0
Qualifier
lowest performance by variety Sufie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For control plots, the grain Zn concentration varied from 20.3 – 30.5 µg g-1, across the genotypes, with the highest performance by advanced line BAW 917 and the lowest performance by variety Sufi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average grain zinc concentration across 17 wheat genotypes was 26.3 µg g-1.

Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Value
26.3 µg g-1e0
Qualifier
17 genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average grain Zn concentration over the 17 genotypes was noted as 26.3 µg g-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–698 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With soil zinc application, wheat grain zinc concentration ranged from 29.1 to 40.9 µg g-1, averaging 34.2 µg g-1.

Treatment
Zn was applied to soile0
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione0
Value
29.1 - 40.9 µg g-1e0
Qualifier
mean of 34.2 µg g-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When Zn was applied to soil, the grain Zn concentration ranged from 29.1 - 40.9 µg g-1 with a mean of 34.2 µg g-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain iron content ranged from 20 to 35 µg g-1, with a mean of 30.5 µg g-1.

Outcome
Fe contente0
Value
20-35 µg g-1e0
Qualifier
mean of 30.5 µg g-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Fe content ranged from 20-35 µg g-1 with a mean of 30.5 µg g-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased wheat grain protein content.

Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The protein content also increases due to the Zn application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased wheat grain zinc content.

Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
Zn content in graine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn application increase the Zn content in grain as well as increase the yield with protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn application increase the Zn content in grain as well as increase the yield with protein content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1047 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

64 papers: 56 positive, 8 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.