Abstract
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of inoculation of corn seeds with Azospirillum brasilense on grain and fodder production, nutritional value and fermentative characteristics of corn silage. The experimental design was completely randomized and consisted of two treatments with the inoculation of A. brasilense and control. The nutritive value of silages and grain yield were evaluated. The inoculation with A. brasilense did not increase the forage production (P> 0.05) however it resulted in an increase (P <0.05) in the silage material buffer power from pH 4.77 to pH 5.37 (meq HCl/100g MS). In silage the inoculation increased (P<0.05) crude protein, total digestible nutrients and degradability of organic matter. These results are associated with lower (P <0.05) concentration of lignin in the silages inoculated with A. brasilense. The grain yield and plant morphology were not altered (P>0.05) by inoculation. The inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not affect the production however it made possible an improvement in the nutritional value of the silage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation did not significantly increase corn forage production.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculation with A. brasilensee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilense
Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont - Outcome
- forage productione0
- Direction
- did not increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The inoculation with A. brasilense did not increase the forage production (P> 0.05)”
t0“corn seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased silage buffer power from pH 4.77 to pH 5.37.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculationt0
- Outcome
- silage material buffer powere0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- pH 5.37 (meq HCl/100g MS)e0
- Qualifier
- pH 4.77e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it resulted in an increase (P <0.05) in the silage material buffer power from pH 4.77 to pH 5.37 (meq HCl/100g MS)”
t0“inoculation of corn seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation increased silage crude protein, total digestible nutrients and organic matter degradability.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculatione0
- Outcome
- crude protein, total digestible nutrients and degradability of organic mattere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In silage the inoculation increased (P<0.05) crude protein, total digestible nutrients and degradability of organic matter.”
t0“corn seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation reduced lignin concentration in corn silage.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculated with A. brasilensee0
- Interactor
- A. brasilense
Azospirillum brasilensee0symbiont - Outcome
- concentration of lignine0
- Direction
- lowere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lower (P <0.05) concentration of lignin in the silages inoculated with A. brasilense”
t0“corn seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation did not significantly alter corn grain yield or plant morphology.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- inoculatione0
- Outcome
- grain yield and plant morphologye0
- Direction
- not alterede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The grain yield and plant morphology were not altered (P>0.05) by inoculation.”
t0“corn seeds”
The same questions in other papers
Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →Azospirillum brasilense · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
125 papers more in this group
See all 129 papers →inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 479 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
534 papers more in this group
See all 538 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.