Paper · 2021 · Boletim de Indústria Animal

Effect of inoculation of corn seeds with azospirillum brasilense on grain and silage production

S. N. Pereira; J. L. Viégas; T. J. Tonin; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of inoculation of corn seeds with Azospirillum brasilense on grain and fodder production, nutritional value and fermentative characteristics of corn silage. The experimental design was completely randomized and consisted of two treatments with the inoculation of A. brasilense and control. The nutritive value of silages and grain yield were evaluated. The inoculation with A. brasilense did not increase the forage production (P> 0.05) however it resulted in an increase (P <0.05) in the silage material buffer power from pH 4.77 to pH 5.37 (meq HCl/100g MS). In silage the inoculation increased (P<0.05) crude protein, total digestible nutrients and degradability of organic matter. These results are associated with lower (P <0.05) concentration of lignin in the silages inoculated with A. brasilense. The grain yield and plant morphology were not altered (P>0.05) by inoculation. The inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense did not affect the production however it made possible an improvement in the nutritional value of the silage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not significantly increase corn forage production.

Treatment
inoculation with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
forage productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inoculation with A. brasilense did not increase the forage production (P> 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased silage buffer power from pH 4.77 to pH 5.37.

Treatment
inoculationt0
Outcome
silage material buffer powere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
pH 5.37 (meq HCl/100g MS)e0
Qualifier
pH 4.77e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it resulted in an increase (P <0.05) in the silage material buffer power from pH 4.77 to pH 5.37 (meq HCl/100g MS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“inoculation of corn seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased silage crude protein, total digestible nutrients and organic matter degradability.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
crude protein, total digestible nutrients and degradability of organic mattere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In silage the inoculation increased (P<0.05) crude protein, total digestible nutrients and degradability of organic matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation reduced lignin concentration in corn silage.

Treatment
inoculated with A. brasilensee0
Interactor
A. brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
concentration of lignine0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · InteractorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower (P <0.05) concentration of lignin in the silages inoculated with A. brasilense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–860 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not significantly alter corn grain yield or plant morphology.

Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
grain yield and plant morphologye0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield and plant morphology were not altered (P>0.05) by inoculation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–35 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum brasilense · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

53 papers: 42 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Azospirillum brasilense · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 42 positive, 7 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

inoculation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

538 papers: 479 positive, 59 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 479 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

534 papers more in this group

See all 538 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.