Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Agronomy

Cowpea Genotypic Variations in N2 Fixation, Water Use Efficiency (δ13C), and Grain Yield in Response to Bradyrhizobium Inoculation in the Field, Measured Using Xylem N Solutes, 15N, and 13C Natural Abundance

Mustapha Mohammed; Glory C. Mbah; Elias N. K. Sowley; et al.

15
claims
25
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To evaluate cowpea genotypic differences in response to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. strains BR 3267 and CB756 in the field, 15 genotypes were assessed for N 2 fixation using 15 N natural abundance and assays of xylem N solutes (ureides, nitrates, and amino-N). Carbon isotope discrimination (δ 13 C) was used as a surrogate for water use efficiency and grain yield determined at maturity. Within each location, the tested cowpeas elicited contrasting responses to inoculation with either Bradyrhizobium strains. For example, inoculating Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 with strain BR 3267 doubled N-fixed and grain yield at Nyankpala when compared to inoculation of the same genotypes with strain CB756, whereas the inoculation of Padituya with strain CB756 increased those same parameters relative to non-inoculation. Similar contrasting results were also obtained at Savelugu and Gbalahi, where bacterial inoculation with each strain resulted in up to a five-fold increase in N-fixed and a four-fold increase in grain yield depending on the cowpea/inoculant combinations used and the planting location. The main effect of genotype showed that the percent N derived from N 2 fixation (%Ndfa) by the test cowpeas ranged between 74.4 and 89.8%, 11.7 and 50.5%, and 71.9 and 90.3% at Nyankpala, Savelugu, and Gbalahi, respectively. The genotypes grown at Savelugu generally exhibited low %Ndfa which was augmented by greater soil N uptake leading to grain yield increases, a finding supported by significant positive correlations when N-fixed and N content were each plotted against grain yield within locations. The inverse relationship between symbiosis and soil N uptake was also supported by negative correlations between xylem nitrate concentration and relative ureide N abundance (RU-N), and between xylem nitrate concentration and %Ndfa measured from 15 N natural abundance. Some high yielding genotypes also elicited greater water use efficiency (δ 13 C), a trait that could be exploited for increased cowpea production in water limiting environments. This study demonstrates the presence of genotypic differences in cowpea response to inoculation in the field and contributes to the literature regarding the factors influencing legume inoculation response in the tropics.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR 3267 doubled N fixed by Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 versus CB756 at Nyankpala.

Material
Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2e0
Treatment
strain BR 3267e0
Interactor
strain BR 3267e0symbiont
Outcome
N-fixede0
Direction
doublede0
Comparator
strain CB756e0
Setting
Nyankpalae0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 with strain BR 3267 doubled N-fixed and grain yield at Nyankpala when compared to inoculation of the same genotypes with strain CB756”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR 3267 doubled grain yield of Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 versus CB756 at Nyankpala.

Material
Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2e0
Treatment
strain BR 3267e0
Interactor
strain BR 3267e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
doublede0
Comparator
strain CB756e0
Setting
Nyankpalae0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 with strain BR 3267 doubled N-fixed and grain yield at Nyankpala when compared to inoculation of the same genotypes with strain CB756”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CB756 increased N fixed in Padituya versus no inoculation.

Material
Padituyae0
Treatment
strain CB756e0
Interactor
strain CB756e0symbiont
Outcome
N-fixede0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-inoculatione0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 with strain BR 3267 doubled N-fixed and grain yield at Nyankpala when compared to inoculation of the same genotypes with strain CB756, whereas the inoculation of Padituya with strain CB756 increased those same parameters relative to non-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CB756 increased grain yield in Padituya versus no inoculation.

Material
Padituyae0
Treatment
strain CB756e0
Interactor
strain CB756e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
non-inoculatione0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculating Apagbaala and IT90K-277-2 with strain BR 3267 doubled N-fixed and grain yield at Nyankpala when compared to inoculation of the same genotypes with strain CB756, whereas the inoculation of Padituya with strain CB756 increased those same parameters relative to non-inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–819 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased N fixed up to fivefold at Savelugu and Gbalahi depending on combination and site.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
N-fixede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
five-folde0
Qualifier
depending on the cowpea/inoculant combinations used and the planting locatione0
Setting
Savelugu and Gbalahie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Savelugu and Gbalahi, where bacterial inoculation with each strain resulted in up to a five-fold increase in N-fixed and a four-fold increase in grain yield depending on the cowpea/inoculant combinations used and the planting location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased grain yield up to fourfold at Savelugu and Gbalahi depending on combination and site.

Treatment
bacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
four-folde0
Qualifier
depending on the cowpea/inoculant combinations used and the planting locatione0
Setting
Savelugu and Gbalahie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at Savelugu and Gbalahi, where bacterial inoculation with each strain resulted in up to a five-fold increase in N-fixed and a four-fold increase in grain yield depending on the cowpea/inoculant combinations used and the planting location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea Ndfa ranged 74.4–89.8% at Nyankpala.

Outcome
%Ndfae0
Value
74.4 and 89.8%e0
Setting
Nyankpalae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“%Ndfa) by the test cowpeas ranged between 74.4 and 89.8%, 11.7 and 50.5%, and 71.9 and 90.3% at Nyankpala, Savelugu, and Gbalahi, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea Ndfa ranged 11.7–50.5% at Savelugu.

Outcome
%Ndfae0
Value
11.7 and 50.5%e0
Setting
Savelugue0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“%Ndfa) by the test cowpeas ranged between 74.4 and 89.8%, 11.7 and 50.5%, and 71.9 and 90.3% at Nyankpala, Savelugu, and Gbalahi, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1330 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea Ndfa ranged 71.9–90.3% at Gbalahi.

Outcome
%Ndfae0
Value
71.9 and 90.3%e0
Setting
Gbalahie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“%Ndfa) by the test cowpeas ranged between 74.4 and 89.8%, 11.7 and 50.5%, and 71.9 and 90.3% at Nyankpala, Savelugu, and Gbalahi, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1330 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low Ndfa at Savelugu was accompanied by greater soil N uptake and higher grain yield.

Taxon
genotypese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
greater soil N uptakee0
Setting
Savelugue0

Verbatim

e0

“genotypes grown at Savelugu generally exhibited low %Ndfa which was augmented by greater soil N uptake leading to grain yield increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1471 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N fixed correlated positively with grain yield within sites.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Qualifier
N-fixede0
Setting
locationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive correlations when N-fixed and N content were each plotted against grain yield within locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N content correlated positively with grain yield within sites.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positive correlationse0
Qualifier
N contente0
Setting
locationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant positive correlations when N-fixed and N content were each plotted against grain yield within locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem nitrate concentration correlated negatively with relative ureide N abundance.

Organ / stage
xyleme0
Outcome
relative ureide N abundancee0
Direction
negative correlationse0
Qualifier
nitrate concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative correlations between xylem nitrate concentration and relative ureide N abundance (RU-N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem nitrate concentration correlated negatively with Ndfa.

Organ / stage
xyleme0
Outcome
%Ndfae0
Direction
negative correlationse0
Qualifier
nitrate concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative correlations between xylem nitrate concentration and relative ureide N abundance (RU-N), and between xylem nitrate concentration and %Ndfa measured from 15 N natural abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1880 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some high yielding genotypes showed greater water use efficiency.

Taxon
genotypese0
Material
genotypese0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
high yieldinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Some high yielding genotypes also elicited greater water use efficiency (δ 13 C)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–1962 · show in text ↑

brassinolide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.