Abstract
The study on mixed cropping of lentil and wheat was conducted under three levels of irrigation. Wheat at 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45 and 50% of the normal seed rates were mixed with full seed rate of lentil to find out a suitable mixing rate of wheat for maximum total yield from unit land. The study was conducted in a split plot design with three replications. Lentil yields obtained with single and two irrigations were identical and higher than with no irrigation. The highest wheat yield was obtained with two irrigations. Total yield was the highest with application of two irrigations. Mixing different proportions of wheat with lentil produced 95-171% additional yield over sole cropping of lentil. Mixing of wheat at 25-35% with lentil was found to be judicious for obtaining maximum total yields. The highest protein yield was obtained with 30-35% and 35% mixing rates of wheat at zero and single irrigation levels. Growing wheat with lentil resulted in increased protein yield in wheat than sole cropping. The highest land equivalent ratio (LER) values were obtained when 30-35% of wheat seed rate were mixed with lentil. Application of two irrigations resulted in high LER values. It is concluded that use of 35% of wheat seed rate along with full seed rate of lentil under two levels of irrigations would be the best mixing ratio for obtaining the highest wheat and total grain yield. Ann. Bangladesh Agric. (2021) 25 (1) : 1-10
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Lentil yield with one or two irrigations was identical and higher than without irrigation.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarise0 - Treatment
- single and two irrigationse0
- Outcome
- Lentil yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- no irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lentil yields obtained with single and two irrigations were identical and higher than with no irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat yield was highest with two irrigations.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- two irrigationse0
- Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest wheat yield was obtained with two irrigations”
Claim · model-written summary
Total yield was highest with two irrigations.
- Taxon
- Wheat–LentilLens culinarisTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- two irrigationse0
- Outcome
- Total yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total yield was the highest with application of two irrigations”
t0“Wheat–Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixing wheat with lentil gave 95-171% more yield than sole lentil.
Verbatim
e0“Mixing different proportions of wheat with lentil produced 95-171% additional yield over sole cropping of lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat mixing rates of 25-35% with lentil gave maximum total yields.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Mixing of wheat at 25-35% with lentile0
- Outcome
- total yieldse0
- Direction
- maximume0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Mixing of wheat at 25-35% with lentil was found to be judicious for obtaining maximum total yields”
Claim · model-written summary
At zero irrigation, wheat mixing rates of 30-35% gave the highest protein yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 30-35%e0
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- zeroe0
Not reportedComparatorSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest protein yield was obtained with 30-35% and 35% mixing rates of wheat at zero and single irrigation levels”
Claim · model-written summary
At single irrigation, a 35% wheat mixing rate gave the highest protein yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 35% mixing rates of wheate0
- Outcome
- protein yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Qualifier
- single irrigation levelse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest protein yield was obtained with 30-35% and 35% mixing rates of wheat at zero and single irrigation levels”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing wheat with lentil increased protein yield in wheat compared with sole cropping.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Growing wheat with lentile0
- Outcome
- protein yield in wheate0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- sole croppinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Growing wheat with lentil resulted in increased protein yield in wheat than sole cropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Land equivalent ratio was highest with 30-35% wheat seed rate mixed with lentil.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 30-35% of wheat seed rate were mixed with lentile0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio (LER) valuese0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest land equivalent ratio (LER) values were obtained when 30-35% of wheat seed rate were mixed with lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations gave high land equivalent ratio values.
- Taxon
- Wheat–LentilLens culinarisTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- two irrigationse0
- Outcome
- LER valuese0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of two irrigations resulted in high LER values”
t0“Wheat–Lentil”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend 35% wheat seed rate with full lentil seed rate under two irrigations for highest wheat and total grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- use of 35% of wheat seed rate along with full seed rate of lentil under two levels of irrigationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“use of 35% of wheat seed rate along with full seed rate of lentil under two levels of irrigations would be the best mixing ratio for obtaining the highest wheat and total grain yield”
The same questions in other papers
Lens culinaris · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Lens culinaris · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →irrigation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
494 papers more in this group
See all 498 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.