Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Transcriptomic and Metabolomic Analysis Provides Insights into the Fruit Quality and Yield Improvement in Tomato under Soilless Substrate-Based Cultivation

Jinghua Guo; Lingdi Dong; Shyam L. Kandel; et al.

20
claims
78
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The effects of soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation on overall fruit quality and yield in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) were studied using the tomato cv. Zhonghua Lvbao. Experiments for tomato soilless cultivation were carried out under greenhouse conditions. Plant growth, fruit quality and yield, and physiologic traits were observed. RNA-seq and RT-PCR, as well as metabolomic analyses were performed to examine the expressed genes and metabolites under soilless substrate cultivation. The results showed that the plant height, stem diameter, and chlorophyll contents of tomato under substrate-based cultivation were increased by 37.3%, 19.8%, and 15.3%, respectively, compared with soil cultivation system. Leaf photosynthetic and transpiration rates, stomatal conductance, and root vitality of tomato, under substrate-based cultivation, increased by 29.0%, 21.2%, 43.9%, and 84.5%, respectively, compared with soil cultivation. The yield reached 7177.5 kg/667 m2, and the relative yield increased by 10.1%, compared with soil cultivation. The contents of total soluble sugar, soluble solids, and vitamin C increased by 35.7%, 19.7%, and 18.2%, respectively, higher than those of soil cultivation in tomato fruits, while nitrate content and titratable acid decreased by 29.4% and 11.8%, respectively. Therefore, substrate-based-cultivation can increase production and improve tomato fruit quality and taste. We examined the expressed genes and metabolites to explore the molecular mechanism of plant growth and overall fruit quality improvement in substrate-based cultivation. A total of 476 differentially expressed genes were identified by transcriptomes profiling, of which 321 and 155 were significantly up- and down-regulated, respectively. The results of metabolomics analysis showed that 441 metabolites were detected, where 24 and 36 metabolites were up- and down-regulated, respectively. By combining analyses of transcriptomic and metabolic groups, genes and metabolites related to the fruit quality were mainly concentrated in the vitamin B6/ascorbic acid/aldonic acidmetabolism, and glycerophospholipid metabolic pathways. Therefore, substrate-based cultivation can elevate vitamin and soluble sugar contents and the expression of fruit flavor related genes, which lays an initial background for exploring the mechanism of substrate-based cultivation, in order to improve the quality of tomato in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of tomato increased by 37.3% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
plant heighte2
Direction
increasede3
Value
37.3%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“the plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–541 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato under substrate-based cultivation were increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–644 · show in text ↑
e4

“37.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–650 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem diameter of tomato increased by 19.8% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
stem diametere2
Direction
increasede3
Value
19.8%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–556 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato under substrate-based cultivation were increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–644 · show in text ↑
e4

“19.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 652–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll contents of tomato increased by 15.3% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse2
Direction
increasede3
Value
15.3%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–582 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato under substrate-based cultivation were increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–644 · show in text ↑
e4

“15.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–668 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthetic rate of tomato increased by 29.0% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
Leaf photosynthetice2
Direction
increasede3
Value
29.0%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf photosynthetic and transpiration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–766 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato, under substrate-based cultivation, increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–866 · show in text ↑
e4

“29.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf transpiration rate of tomato increased by 21.2% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
transpiration ratese2
Direction
increasede3
Value
21.2%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“transpiration rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–766 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato, under substrate-based cultivation, increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–866 · show in text ↑
e4

“21.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance of tomato increased by 43.9% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee2
Direction
increasede3
Value
43.9%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“stomatal conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–788 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato, under substrate-based cultivation, increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–866 · show in text ↑
e4

“43.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root vitality of tomato increased by 84.5% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
root vitalitye2
Direction
increasede3
Value
84.5%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“root vitality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–807 · show in text ↑
e3

“tomato, under substrate-based cultivation, increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–866 · show in text ↑
e4

“84.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under substrate-based cultivation reached 7177.5 kg per 667 m2.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
yielde2
Value
7177.5 kg/667 m2e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield reached 7177.5 kg/667 m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–979 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative tomato yield increased by 10.1% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
relative yielde2
Direction
increasede3
Value
10.1%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“the relative yield increased by 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1022 · show in text ↑
e3

“the relative yield increased by 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1022 · show in text ↑
e4

“the relative yield increased by 10.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble sugar content in tomato fruits increased by 35.7% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
total soluble sugare2
Direction
increasede3
Value
35.7%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil cultivation in tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“total soluble sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1091 · show in text ↑
e3

“vitamin C increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1135 · show in text ↑
e4

“35.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble solids content in tomato fruits increased by 19.7% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
soluble solidse2
Direction
increasede3
Value
19.7%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil cultivation in tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“soluble solids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1107 · show in text ↑
e3

“vitamin C increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1135 · show in text ↑
e4

“19.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content in tomato fruits increased by 18.2% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
vitamin Ce2
Direction
increasede3
Value
18.2%e4
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil cultivation in tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1122 · show in text ↑
e3

“vitamin C increased by”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1135 · show in text ↑
e4

“18.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrate content of tomato fruits decreased by 29.4% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
nitrate contente2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
29.4%e2
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil cultivation in tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrate content and titratable acid decreased by 29.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1291 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Titratable acid of tomato fruits decreased by 11.8% under substrate-based cultivation compared with soil cultivation.

Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
soilless substrate-basede1
Outcome
titratable acide2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
11.8%e2
Comparator
soil cultivatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil cultivation in tomato fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1196–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“soilless substrate-based versus soil cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–63 · show in text ↑
e2

“titratable acid decreased by 29.4% and 11.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1301 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptome profiling identified 321 significantly up-regulated differentially expressed genes in tomato under substrate-based cultivation.

Outcome
differentially expressed genese1
Value
321e2
Qualifier
significantly up-e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“differentially expressed genes were identified by transcriptomes profiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1682 · show in text ↑
e2

“321 and 155 were significantly up- and down-regulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transcriptome profiling identified 155 significantly down-regulated differentially expressed genes in tomato under substrate-based cultivation.

Outcome
differentially expressed genese1
Value
155e2
Qualifier
down-regulatede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“differentially expressed genes were identified by transcriptomes profiling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1608–1682 · show in text ↑
e2

“321 and 155 were significantly up- and down-regulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1746 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metabolomic analysis detected 441 metabolites in tomato under substrate-based cultivation.

Outcome
metabolitese1
Value
441e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“441 metabolites were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1811–1840 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

24 metabolites were up-regulated in tomato under substrate-based cultivation.

Outcome
metabolitese1
Value
24e1
Qualifier
up-e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“where 24 and 36 metabolites were up- and down-regulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

36 metabolites were down-regulated in tomato under substrate-based cultivation.

Outcome
metabolitese1
Value
36e1
Qualifier
down-regulatede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“where 24 and 36 metabolites were up- and down-regulated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1842–1897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genes and metabolites related to tomato fruit quality were mainly concentrated in vitamin B6/ascorbic acid/aldonic acid metabolism and glycerophospholipid metabolic pathways.

Outcome
genes and metabolites related to the fruit qualitye1
Qualifier
vitamin B6/ascorbic acid/aldonic acidmetabolism, and glycerophospholipid metabolic pathwayse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 102–131 · show in text ↑
e1

“genes and metabolites related to the fruit quality were mainly concentrated in the vitamin B6/ascorbic acid/aldonic acidmetabolism, and glycerophospholipid metabolic pathways”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1975–2149 · show in text ↑

growing medium · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

growing medium · physiology: gas exchange · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

growing medium · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

growing medium · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 12 positive, 5 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

growing medium · physiology: photosynthesis · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 14 positive, 6 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

growing medium · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

growing medium · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 34 positive, 7 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.