Paper · 2022 · Plants

Silicate Inhibits the Cytosolic Influx of Chloride in Protoplasts of Wheat and Affects the Chloride Transporters, TaCLC1 and TaNPF2.4/2.5

Albert Premkumar; Muhammad Tariq Javed; Katharina Pawlowski; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chloride is an essential nutrient for plants, but high concentrations can be harmful. Silicon ameliorates both abiotic and biotic stresses in plants, but it is unknown if it can prevent cellular increase of chloride. Therefore, we investigated the influx of Cl− ions in two wheat cultivars different in salt sensitivity, by epifluorescence microscopy and a highly Cl−-sensitive dye, MQAE, N-[ethoxycarbonylmethyl]-6-methoxy-quinolinium bromide, in absence and presence of potassium silicate, K2SiO3. The Cl−-influx was higher in the salt-sensitive cv. Vinjett, than in the salt-tolerant cv. S-24, and silicate pre-treatment of protoplasts inhibited the Cl−-influx in both cultivars, but more in the sensitive cv. Vinjett. To investigate if the Cl−-transporters TaCLC1 and TaNPF2.4/2.5 are affected by silicate, expression analyses by RT-qPCR were undertaken of TaCLC1 and TaNPF 2.4/2.5 transcripts in the absence and presence of 100 mM NaCl, with and without the presence of K2SiO3. The results show that both transporter genes were expressed in roots and shoots of wheat seedlings, but their expressions were differently affected by silicate. The TaNPF2.4/2.5 expression in leaves was markedly depressed by silicate. These findings demonstrate that less chloride accumulates in the cytosol of leaf mesophyll by Si treatment and increases salt tolerance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-sensitive Vinjett had higher chloride influx than salt-tolerant S-24.

Material
cv. Vinjette0
Outcome
Cl−-influxe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cv. S-24e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Cl−-influx was higher in the salt-sensitive cv. Vinjett, than in the salt-tolerant cv. S-24”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicate pretreatment inhibited chloride influx in both wheat cultivars.

Organ / stage
protoplastse0
Treatment
silicate pre-treatmente0
Outcome
Cl−-influxe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicate pre-treatment of protoplasts inhibited the Cl−-influx in both cultivars, but more in the sensitive cv. Vinjett”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicate inhibition of chloride influx was stronger in Vinjett.

Material
cv. Vinjette0
Treatment
silicate pre-treatmente0
Outcome
Cl−-influxe0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
both cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“silicate pre-treatment of protoplasts inhibited the Cl−-influx in both cultivars, but more in the sensitive cv. Vinjett”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both transporter genes were expressed in wheat roots and shoots.

Gene
TaCLC1 and TaNPF2.4/2.5e1
Outcome
expressed in roots and shootse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both transporter genes were expressed in roots and shoots of wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“TaCLC1 and TaNPF2.4/2.5 are affected by silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–809 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicate affected expression of the two transporters differently.

Treatment
silicatee0
Gene
TaCLC1 and TaNPF2.4/2.5e1
Outcome
expressionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their expressions were differently affected by silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“TaCLC1 and TaNPF2.4/2.5 are affected by silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicate markedly depressed leaf TaNPF2.4/2.5 expression.

Treatment
silicatee0
Gene
TaNPF2.4/2.5e0
Outcome
expression in leavese0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TaNPF2.4/2.5 expression in leaves was markedly depressed by silicate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude silicon treatment reduces cytosolic chloride accumulation in leaf mesophyll.

Treatment
Si treatmente0
Outcome
chloride accumulates in the cytosol of leaf mesophylle0
Direction
lesse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“less chloride accumulates in the cytosol of leaf mesophyll by Si treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude silicon treatment increases salt tolerance.

Treatment
Si treatmente0
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“by Si treatment and increases salt tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 32 positive, 2 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

silicon atom · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.