Paper · 2022 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Corn yield and nitrogen recovery following rye (Secale cereale L.) in monoculture and polyculture service crops

Cameron M. Ogilvie; Laurent Van Arkel; Laura L. Van Eerd; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Planting service crops (SCs) with late summer manure applications has been promoted as an agronomic practice to capture manure nitrogen (N) and release it to the following season’s cash crop, thereby reducing fertilizer N requirements. The present study explored this hypothesis using a cereal rye ( Secale cereale L.) monoculture SC, along with two polyculture SCs (4 species and 12 species) both containing rye, planted after winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) harvest, in systems with and without liquid hog manure. The following spring, SC regrowth was chemically terminated 1 week prior to corn ( Zea mays L.) planting, and a sidedress N application was made at the 6–8 leaf stage to half of the plots. Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years, even though SCs did not reduce soil mineral N nor partial plant-available N over the corn-growing season. Additionally, the sidedress N application could not overcome the yield loss associated with rye. Thus, this study did not observe N release by SCs to the following cash crop and demonstrates that yield loss can occur when corn follows rye SCs irrespective of changes in plant available N. This research reinforces the importance of selecting appropriate species and their proportions in polycultures, to mitigate negative impacts of SCs, especially those of rye on corn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye monoculture service crops reduced corn N accumulation and final grain yield by up to 20% in both years.

Treatment
rye monoculturee0
Outcome
Corn N accumulation and final grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
in both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Service crops did not reduce soil mineral N or partial plant-available N over the corn-growing season.

Treatment
SCse2
Outcome
soil mineral N nor partial plant-available Ne2
Direction
did not reducee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
e2

“SCs did not reduce soil mineral N nor partial plant-available N over the corn-growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Service crops did not release N to the following cash crop.

Treatment
SCse3
Outcome
N releasee3
Direction
did not observee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
e3

“this study did not observe N release by SCs to the following cash crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sidedress N application could not overcome the corn yield loss associated with rye.

Treatment
sidedress N applicatione4
Outcome
yield loss associated with ryee4
Direction
could not overcomee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
e4

“the sidedress N application could not overcome the yield loss associated with rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield loss can occur when corn follows rye service crops irrespective of plant-available N changes.

Treatment
rye SCse5
Outcome
yield losse5
Direction
can occure5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
e5

“yield loss can occur when corn follows rye SCs irrespective of changes in plant available N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1213 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting appropriate species and their proportions in polycultures is important to mitigate negative impacts of rye service crops on corn.

Outcome
selecting appropriate species and their proportions in polyculturese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn N accumulation and final grain yield were reduced up to 20% following the rye monoculture in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–818 · show in text ↑
e6

“This research reinforces the importance of selecting appropriate species and their proportions in polycultures, to mitigate negative impacts of SCs, especially those of rye on corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1215–1395 · show in text ↑

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 254 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,906 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.