Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Genetic Diversity in Nitrogen Fertiliser Responses and N Gas Emission in Modern Wheat

Maria Oszvald; Kirsty L. Hassall; David Hughes; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Crops assimilate nitrogen (N) as ammonium via the glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase (GS/GOGAT) pathway which is of central importance for N uptake and potentially represents a bottle neck for N fertiliser-use efficiency. The aim of this study was to assess whether genetic diversity for N-assimilation capacity exists in wheat and could be exploited for breeding. Wheat plants rapidly, within 6 h, responded to N application with an increase in GS activity. This was not accompanied by an increase in GS gene transcript abundance and a comparison of GS1 and GS2 protein models revealed a high degree of sequence conservation. N responsiveness amongst ten wheat varieties was assessed by measuring GS enzyme activity, leaf tissue ammonium, and by a leaf-disc assay as a proxy for apoplastic ammonia. Based on these data, a high-GS group showing an overall positive response to N could be distinguished from an inefficient, low-GS group. Subsequent gas emission measurements confirmed plant ammonia emission in response to N application and also revealed emission of N 2 O when N was provided as nitrate, which is in agreement with our current understanding that N 2 O is a by-product of nitrate reduction. Taken together, the data suggest that there is scope for improving N assimilation capacity in wheat and that further investigations into the regulation and role of GS-GOGAT in NH 3 emission is justified. Likewise, emission of the climate gas N 2 O needs to be reduced, and future research should focus on assessing the nitrate reductase pathway in wheat and explore fertiliser management options.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application increased GS activity in wheat within 6 h.

Treatment
N applicatione1
Gene
GSe1
Outcome
GS activitye1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
within 6 he1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Wheat plants rapidly, within 6 h, responded to N application with an increase in GS activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N application did not increase GS gene transcript abundance in wheat.

Treatment
N applicatione1
Gene
GSe2
Outcome
GS gene transcript abundancee2
Direction
not accompanied by an increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“This was not accompanied by an increase in GS gene transcript abundance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“Wheat plants rapidly, within 6 h, responded to N application with an increase in GS activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GS1 and GS2 protein models of wheat showed a high degree of sequence conservation.

Gene
GS1 and GS2e3
Outcome
sequence conservatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“a comparison of GS1 and GS2 protein models revealed a high degree of sequence conservation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high-GS group of ten wheat varieties with an overall positive N response could be distinguished from a low-GS group.

Material
high-GS groupe4
Outcome
overall positive response to Ne4
Comparator
low-GS groupe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Based on these data, a high-GS group showing an overall positive response to N could be distinguished from an inefficient, low-GS group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–940 · show in text ↑
e5

“N responsiveness amongst ten wheat varieties was assessed by measuring GS enzyme activity, leaf tissue ammonium, and by a leaf-disc assay as a proxy for apoplastic ammonia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–803 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat emitted plant ammonia in response to N application.

Treatment
N applicatione6
Outcome
plant ammonia emissione6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Subsequent gas emission measurements confirmed plant ammonia emission in response to N application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1040 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat emitted N2O when N was provided as nitrate.

Treatment
N was provided as nitratee7
Outcome
emission of N 2 Oe7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“also revealed emission of N 2 O when N was provided as nitrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The data suggest scope for improving N assimilation capacity in wheat.

Outcome
improving N assimilation capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the data suggest that there is scope for improving N assimilation capacity in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1310 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Future research should assess the nitrate reductase pathway in wheat.

Outcome
assessing the nitrate reductase pathway in wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“future research should focus on assessing the nitrate reductase pathway in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1484–1564 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Emission of N2O from wheat needs to be reduced.

Outcome
emission of the climate gas N 2 Oe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Likewise, emission of the climate gas N 2 O needs to be reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1415–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“Modern Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 26 positive, 2 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 26 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
    AlaAT1 and AlaAT2 mRNA levels were lower on nitrogen-free medium.

    Differential regulation of alanine aminotransferase homologues by abiotic stresses in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings · 2012 · compared with light-grown seedlings

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.