Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen starvation significantly decreased NR, NiR, GS and GOGAT transcript levels.

A claim from Nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthase expression and activity in response to different nitrogen sources in nitrogen‐starved wheat seedlings · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen starvation significantly decreased NR, NiR, GS and GOGAT transcript levels.

Treatment
Nitrogen starvatione0
Outcome
transcript levelse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen starvation caused a significant decrease both in transcript levels and in NR, NiR, GS, and GOGAT activities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–818
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 169–174

Title

Nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate synthase expression and activity in response to different nitrogen sources in nitrogen‐starved wheat seedlings

Sadegh Balotf; Gholamreza Kavoosi; Bahman Kholdebarin Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry 2015. doi:10.1002/bab.1362

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-a0c8748697bf3a8145e179c48d15df1471d12635b1f118541859663d431dcde2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · molecular: expression · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 26 positive, 11 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction

This claim is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.