Paper · 2022 · IVES Technical Reviews vine and wine

A holistic approach to using biostimulants on the red grapevine variety, Mouhtaro - from grape to wine

Dimitrios-Evangelos Miliordos; Myrto Tsiknia; Nikolaos Kontoudakis; et al.

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

One of the main effects of applying biostimulants to grapevines is an increase in berry phenolic compound content. In the current study, grapes treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT) were vinified. Treated grapes, compared to untreated grapes (the control), resulted in wines with a significantly higher concentration of anthocyanins and phenolic content. Furthermore, in a descriptive sensory analysis, wines made from treated grapes were found to have significantly more intense fruity notes and aroma and better overall mouthfeel quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wines from grapes treated at veraison with ABA, BTH and chitosan had a significantly higher concentration of anthocyanins and phenolic content than wines from untreated grapes.

Taxon
grapese1
Material
Mouhtarot0
Treatment
treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT)e2
Outcome
concentration of anthocyanins and phenolic contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
untreated grapes (the control)e1

Verbatim

e1

“Treated grapes, compared to untreated grapes (the control), resulted in wines with a significantly higher concentration of anthocyanins and phenolic content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–403 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapes treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT) were vinified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–245 · show in text ↑
t0

“red grapevine variety, Mouhtaro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wines from treated grapes were found to have significantly more intense fruity notes and aroma in descriptive sensory analysis.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT)e2
Outcome
fruity notes and aromae1
Direction
more intensee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“wines made from treated grapes were found to have significantly more intense fruity notes and aroma and better overall mouthfeel quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–589 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapes treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT) were vinified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–245 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wines from treated grapes were found to have better overall mouthfeel quality in descriptive sensory analysis.

Taxon
grapese1
Treatment
treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT)e2
Outcome
overall mouthfeel qualitye1
Direction
bettere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“wines made from treated grapes were found to have significantly more intense fruity notes and aroma and better overall mouthfeel quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 453–589 · show in text ↑
e2

“grapes treated at veraison with abscisic acid (ABA), benzothiadiazole (BTH) and chitosan (CHT) were vinified”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–245 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: general · VitisResults differ

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults differ

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

(+)-abscisic acid · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

acibenzolar-S-methyl · quality: phytochemicals · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.