Paper · 1993 · The Plant Journal

Developmentally regulated expression of the wound- and pathogen-responsive tomato anionic peroxidase in green fruits

Bruce A. Sherf; P.E. Kolattukudy

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A highly anionic peroxidase (TAP) isolated from tomato was thought to be induced only upon wounding or fungal attack as this protein and its mRNA could not be detected in the vegetative tissues of healthy tomato but accumulated to very high levels in tissues responding to wounding or fungal attack. We now demonstrate a pattern of developmentally regulated expression of the tap gene in the exocarp of green, but not red, tomato fruits. Detaching green fruits from the vine, however, leads to the complete loss of the tap transcript within 72 h. Administration of various growth regulators through the pedicel of detached green fruits revealed that cytokinin was able to sustain a level of tap transcripts in 72 h detached fruits comparable with that found in fruits attached to the vine. Wound-induced expression of tap was confined to the healing periderm of green fruits but was not detectable in the wound-tissue of post-climacteric ripening fruits. These results suggest that the developmental and wound regulated expression of tap may occur by separate or overlapping signal transduction pathways. Treatment of tomato plants and green fruits with 2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon) demonstrated that ethylene does not effect the developmental suppression of tap in post-climacteric fruits, nor does it alter the normal levels of tap transcripts in either healthy or wound-healing tomato tissues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tap gene was expressed in green fruit exocarp but not red fruit exocarp.

Organ / stage
exocarp of greene0
Gene
tap genee0
Outcome
expression of the tap genee0
Comparator
rede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We now demonstrate a pattern of developmentally regulated expression of the tap gene in the exocarp of green, but not red, tomato fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Detaching green fruit led to complete loss of tap transcript within 72 hours.

Organ / stage
green fruitse0
Treatment
Detaching green fruits from the vinee0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
tap transcripte0
Direction
complete losse0
Value
72 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Detaching green fruits from the vine, however, leads to the complete loss of the tap transcript within 72 h.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–546 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin sustained tap transcript in detached fruit at levels comparable with attached fruit.

Organ / stage
detached fruitse0
Treatment
cytokinine0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
tap transcriptse0
Direction
sustaine0
Qualifier
72 he0
Comparator
fruits attached to the vinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cytokinin was able to sustain a level of tap transcripts in 72 h detached fruits comparable with that found in fruits attached to the vine.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wound-induced tap expression was confined to healing periderm of green fruit.

Organ / stage
healing periderm of green fruitse0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
Wound-induced expression of tape0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wound-induced expression of tap was confined to the healing periderm of green fruits but was not detectable in the wound-tissue of post-climacteric ripening fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wound-induced tap expression was undetectable in post-climacteric ripening fruit wound tissue.

Organ / stage
wound-tissue of post-climacteric ripening fruitse0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
not detectablee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wound-induced expression of tap was confined to the healing periderm of green fruits but was not detectable in the wound-tissue of post-climacteric ripening fruits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that developmental and wound regulation of tap may use separate or overlapping signal pathways.

Gene
tape0
Outcome
expression of tape0
Qualifier
separate or overlapping signal transduction pathwayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results suggest that the developmental and wound regulated expression of tap may occur by separate or overlapping signal transduction pathways.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not cause developmental suppression of tap in post-climacteric fruit.

Organ / stage
post-climacteric fruitse0
Treatment
2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon)e0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
developmental suppression of tape0
Direction
does not effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of tomato plants and green fruits with 2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon) demonstrated that ethylene does not effect the developmental suppression of tap in post-climacteric fruits, nor does it alter the normal levels of tap transcripts in either healthy or wound-healing tomato tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not alter tap transcript levels in healthy tomato tissue.

Organ / stage
healthye0
Treatment
2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon)e0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
normal levels of tap transcriptse0
Direction
nor does it altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of tomato plants and green fruits with 2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon) demonstrated that ethylene does not effect the developmental suppression of tap in post-climacteric fruits, nor does it alter the normal levels of tap transcripts in either healthy or wound-healing tomato tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1408 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not alter tap transcript levels in wound-healing tomato tissue.

Organ / stage
wound-healing tomato tissuese0
Treatment
2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon)e0
Gene
tape0
Outcome
normal levels of tap transcriptse0
Direction
nor does it altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of tomato plants and green fruits with 2-chloro-ethylphosphonic acid (ethephon) demonstrated that ethylene does not effect the developmental suppression of tap in post-climacteric fruits, nor does it alter the normal levels of tap transcripts in either healthy or wound-healing tomato tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1408 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

class · molecular: expression · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 18 positive, 7 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.