Paper · 1956 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

On bulb formation and dormancy in onion. IV

T. AOBA

7
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This paper reports the results of the influence of storage temperature on the sprouting of stored onion. (1) High temperature (above 28°C) in storage inhibited remarkably the growth of inner scals of onion and delayed sprouting, but high temperature promoted breaking of dormancy so markedly, that the storage under high temperature followed by ordinary temperature accelerated the sprouting. (2) It seemed that low temperature neither breaked nor prolonged the rest period of onion bulbs, but it clearly inhibited the growth of inner scales, and made their sprouting delayed. (3) The relation of season of harvest to sprouting in stored onion, and requirements of stored temperature for onion are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High storage temperature above 28°C inhibited growth of onion inner scales.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Organ / stage
inner scalse0
Treatment
High temperature (above 28°C) in storagee0
Outcome
growth of inner scalse0
Direction
inhibited remarkablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature (above 28°C) in storage inhibited remarkably the growth of inner scals of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High storage temperature above 28°C delayed onion sprouting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
High temperature (above 28°C) in storagee0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature (above 28°C) in storage inhibited remarkably the growth of inner scals of onion and delayed sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High storage temperature promoted the breaking of onion dormancy.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
breaking of dormancye0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high temperature promoted breaking of dormancy so markedly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–291 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature storage followed by ordinary temperature accelerated onion sprouting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
storage under high temperature followed by ordinary temperaturee0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the storage under high temperature followed by ordinary temperature accelerated the sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–391 · show in text ↑
t0

“onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature appeared neither to break nor prolong the rest period of onion bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
rest period of onion bulbse0
Direction
neither breaked nor prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperature neither breaked nor prolonged the rest period of onion bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature inhibited growth of onion inner scales.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
growth of inner scalese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperature neither breaked nor prolonged the rest period of onion bulbs, but it clearly inhibited the growth of inner scales”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperature delayed sprouting of onion bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
low temperaturee0
Outcome
sproutinge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low temperature neither breaked nor prolonged the rest period of onion bulbs, but it clearly inhibited the growth of inner scales, and made their sprouting delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–575 · show in text ↑

cold · organism · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

heat · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cold · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heat · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cold · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

storage · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 19 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 18 positive, 10 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.