Paper · 2000 · Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research

Differences in Microsite, Plant Form, and Low-Temperature Photoinhibition in Alpine Plants

M. J. Germino; W. K. Smith

12
claims
14
verbatim quotes
42
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Low temperatures and high sunlight, factors that are characteristic of high elevations, may lead to the low-temperature photoinhibition of photosynthesis (LTP).Exposure and photosynthetic responses to low temperature and high sunlight were compared among current-year seedlings of the conifers Abies lasiocarpa and Picea engelmannii, and the snowbank perennials Caltha leptosepala and Erythronium grandiflorum, in the alpine treeline ecotone.The ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf area of whole plants was greatest in A. lasiocarpa (0.33), 25% lower in P. engelmannii (0.25), and at least 36% lower in the snowbank perennials than for A. lasiocarpa.This indicated less structural avoidance of high sunlight in the conifer seedlings, particularly A. lasiocarpa.CO 2 assimilation (A,at) in A. lasiocarpa was reduced 40% due to frosts, high sunlight (22%), and their combination (90%).A sa ' was much less affected by frosts and high sunlight in P. engelmannii and especially the perennials.Following frost and high sunlight exposure, diurnal reductions in maximum photosynthetic efficiency, indicated by the chlorophyll fluorescence ratio FJFmcorresponded to species differences in A,a,' A substantially greater degree of slowly-reversible, or irreversible LTP (44% reduction in predawn FJF m ) occurred in the microclimate above snow for A. lasiocarpa compared to the other species.It appears that a higher resistance to LTP in the perennials may contribute to their greater occurrence in microsites with lower temperatures and higher sunlight compared to the conifer seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of sunlit silhouette to total leaf area of whole plants was greatest in Abies lasiocarpa seedlings (0.33).

Taxon
A. lasiocarpaAbies lasiocarpae0
Outcome
ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf areae0
Direction
greateste0
Value
0.33e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies lasiocarpa
Abies lasiocarpa · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf area of whole plants was greatest in A. lasiocarpa (0.33)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of sunlit silhouette to total leaf area was 25% lower in Picea engelmannii (0.25) than in A. lasiocarpa.

Taxon
P. engelmanniiPicea engelmanniie0
Outcome
ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf areae0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.25e0
Comparator
A. lasiocarpae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea engelmannii
Picea engelmannii · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf area of whole plants was greatest in A. lasiocarpa (0.33), 25% lower in P. engelmannii (0.25)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of sunlit silhouette to total leaf area was at least 36% lower in the snowbank perennials than in A. lasiocarpa.

Taxon
snowbank perennialse1
Outcome
ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf areae0
Direction
lowere1
Value
36%e1
Qualifier
at leaste1
Comparator
A. lasiocarpae1

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of silhouette (sunlit) to total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–493 · show in text ↑
e1

“at least 36% lower in the snowbank perennials than for A. lasiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–656 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The silhouette-area results indicate less structural avoidance of high sunlight in the conifer seedlings, particularly A. lasiocarpa.

Taxon
conifer seedlingse0
Outcome
structural avoidance of high sunlighte0
Direction
lesse0

Verbatim

e0

“This indicated less structural avoidance of high sunlight in the conifer seedlings, particularly A. lasiocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 assimilation in A. lasiocarpa was reduced by 40% due to frosts.

Taxon
A. lasiocarpaAbies lasiocarpae0
Treatment
frostse0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies lasiocarpa
Abies lasiocarpa · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation (A,at) in A. lasiocarpa was reduced 40% due to frosts, high sunlight (22%), and their combination (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 assimilation in A. lasiocarpa was reduced by 22% due to high sunlight.

Taxon
A. lasiocarpaAbies lasiocarpae0
Treatment
high sunlighte0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies lasiocarpa
Abies lasiocarpa · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation (A,at) in A. lasiocarpa was reduced 40% due to frosts, high sunlight (22%), and their combination (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 assimilation in A. lasiocarpa was reduced by 90% due to the combination of frosts and high sunlight.

Taxon
A. lasiocarpaAbies lasiocarpae0
Treatment
their combinatione0
Outcome
CO 2 assimilatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies lasiocarpa
Abies lasiocarpa · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CO 2 assimilation (A,at) in A. lasiocarpa was reduced 40% due to frosts, high sunlight (22%), and their combination (90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilation was much less affected by frosts and high sunlight in P. engelmannii than in A. lasiocarpa.

Taxon
P. engelmanniiPicea engelmanniie0
Treatment
frosts and high sunlighte0
Outcome
A sa 'e0
Direction
much less affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea engelmannii
Picea engelmannii · TaxonFamartin · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A sa ' was much less affected by frosts and high sunlight in P. engelmannii and especially the perennials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–995 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assimilation was especially little affected by frosts and high sunlight in the snowbank perennials.

Taxon
perennialse0
Treatment
frosts and high sunlighte0
Outcome
A sa 'e0
Direction
much less affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A sa ' was much less affected by frosts and high sunlight in P. engelmannii and especially the perennials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–995 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After frost and high sunlight exposure, diurnal reductions in maximum photosynthetic efficiency (chlorophyll fluorescence ratio) corresponded to species differences in assimilation.

Taxon
Alpine Plantst0
Treatment
frost and high sunlight exposuree0
Outcome
maximum photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
corresponded to species differences in A,a,'e0

Verbatim

t0

“Differences in Microsite, Plant Form, and Low-Temperature Photoinhibition in Alpine Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–90 · show in text ↑
e0

“Following frost and high sunlight exposure, diurnal reductions in maximum photosynthetic efficiency, indicated by the chlorophyll fluorescence ratio FJFmcorresponded to species differences in A,a,'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slowly-reversible or irreversible low-temperature photoinhibition (44% reduction in predawn Fv/Fm) was substantially greater for A. lasiocarpa in the microclimate above snow than in the other species.

Taxon
A. lasiocarpaAbies lasiocarpae0
Outcome
slowly-reversible, or irreversible LTPe0
Direction
greatere0
Value
44% reductione0
Comparator
the other speciese0
Setting
microclimate above snowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abies lasiocarpa
Abies lasiocarpa · TaxonWalter Siegmund · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A substantially greater degree of slowly-reversible, or irreversible LTP (44% reduction in predawn FJF m ) occurred in the microclimate above snow for A. lasiocarpa compared to the other species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1388 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher resistance to low-temperature photoinhibition in the perennials may contribute to their greater occurrence in microsites with lower temperatures and higher sunlight than the conifer seedlings.

Taxon
perennialse0
Outcome
greater occurrence in microsites with lower temperatures and higher sunlighte0
Qualifier
higher resistance to LTPe0
Comparator
conifer seedlingse0

Verbatim

e0

“higher resistance to LTP in the perennials may contribute to their greater occurrence in microsites with lower temperatures and higher sunlight compared to the conifer seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1584 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Abies lasiocarpa (subalpine fir)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.