Paper · 2022 · Water

Effects of Water and Nitrogen Management on Water Productivity, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Leaching Loss in Rice Paddies

Kaiwen Chen; Shuang’en Yu; Tao Ma; et al.

16
claims
23
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Effective water and nitrogen (N) management strategies are critical for sustainable agricultural development. Lysimeter experiments with two deep percolation rates (low percolation and high percolation, i.e., LP and HP: 3 mm d−1 and 5 mm d−1) and five N application levels (N0~N4: 0, 60, 135, 210 and 285 kg N ha−1) were conducted to investigate the effects of controlled drainage on water productivity (WP) and N use efficiency (NUE) in water-saving irrigated paddy fields. The results demonstrated that NH4+-N and NO3−-N were the major components of total nitrogen (TN) in ponded water and leachate, accounting for more than 77.1% and 83.6% of TN, respectively. The risk of N leaching loss increased significantly under treatment of high percolation rates or high N application levels. High percolation loss required greater irrigation input, thus reducing WP. In addition, N uptake increased with increasing N application, but fertilization applied in excess of crop demand had a negative effect on grain yield. NUE was affected by the amount of N applied and increased with decreasing N levels. Water and N application levels had a significant effect on N uptake of rice, but their interaction on N uptake or NUE was not significant. For the LP and HP regimes, the highest N uptake and WP were obtained with N application levels of 285 kg ha−1 and 210 kg ha−1, respectively. Our overall results suggested that the combination of controlled drainage and water-saving irrigation was a feasible mitigation strategy to reduce N losses through subdrainage percolation and to provide more nutrients available for rice to improve NUE, thus reducing diffuse agricultural pollution. Long-term field trials are necessary to validate the lysimeter results.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH4+-N and NO3−-N were major components of ponded-water total nitrogen, accounting for more than 77.1%.

Outcome
NH4+-N and NO3−-Ne0
Value
more than 77.1%e0
Qualifier
ponded watere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NH4+-N and NO3−-N were the major components of total nitrogen (TN) in ponded water and leachate, accounting for more than 77.1% and 83.6% of TN, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–663 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NH4+-N and NO3−-N accounted for 83.6% of total nitrogen in leachate.

Outcome
NH4+-N and NO3−-Ne0
Value
83.6%e0
Qualifier
leachatee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“NH4+-N and NO3−-N were the major components of total nitrogen (TN) in ponded water and leachate, accounting for more than 77.1% and 83.6% of TN, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High percolation significantly increased nitrogen leaching risk.

Treatment
high percolation ratese0
Outcome
risk of N leaching losse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The risk of N leaching loss increased significantly under treatment of high percolation rates or high N application levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen application significantly increased nitrogen leaching risk.

Treatment
high N application levelse0
Outcome
risk of N leaching losse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The risk of N leaching loss increased significantly under treatment of high percolation rates or high N application levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–787 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High percolation required greater irrigation input.

Treatment
High percolation losse0
Outcome
irrigation inpute0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High percolation loss required greater irrigation input, thus reducing WP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High percolation reduced rice water productivity.

Treatment
High percolation losse0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High percolation loss required greater irrigation input, thus reducing WP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–862 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen uptake increased with nitrogen application.

Treatment
increasing N applicatione0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N uptake increased with increasing N application, but fertilization applied in excess of crop demand had a negative effect on grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1014 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization exceeding rice demand negatively affected grain yield.

Treatment
fertilization applied in excess of crop demande0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization applied in excess of crop demand had a negative effect on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice nitrogen use efficiency increased as nitrogen application decreased.

Treatment
decreasing N levelse0
Outcome
NUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NUE was affected by the amount of N applied and increased with decreasing N levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water application significantly affected rice nitrogen uptake, with direction unspecified.

Treatment
Watere0
Outcome
N uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water and N application levels had a significant effect on N uptake of rice, but their interaction on N uptake or NUE was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly affected rice nitrogen uptake.

Treatment
N application levelse0
Outcome
N uptakee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water and N application levels had a significant effect on N uptake of rice, but their interaction on N uptake or NUE was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of water and nitrogen application on rice nitrogen uptake and efficiency was not significant.

Treatment
Water and N application levelse0
Outcome
N uptake or NUEe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water and N application levels had a significant effect on N uptake of rice, but their interaction on N uptake or NUE was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For LP and HP regimes, highest rice nitrogen uptake occurred at 285 kg ha−1 nitrogen application.

Treatment
285 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
LP and HP regimese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the LP and HP regimes, the highest N uptake and WP were obtained with N application levels of 285 kg ha−1 and 210 kg ha−1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For LP and HP regimes, highest rice water productivity occurred at 210 kg ha−1 nitrogen application.

Treatment
210 kg ha−1e0
Outcome
WPe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
LP and HP regimese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the LP and HP regimes, the highest N uptake and WP were obtained with N application levels of 285 kg ha−1 and 210 kg ha−1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend controlled drainage combined with water-saving irrigation to reduce nitrogen losses and improve rice nitrogen availability and efficiency.

Outcome
combination of controlled drainage and water-saving irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our overall results suggested that the combination of controlled drainage and water-saving irrigation was a feasible mitigation strategy to reduce N losses through subdrainage percolation and to provide more nutrients available for rice to improve NUE, thus reducing diffuse agricultural pollution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1677 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Long-term field trials are necessary to validate the rice lysimeter results.

Outcome
Long-term field trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long-term field trials are necessary to validate the lysimeter results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1749 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–113 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

271 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,183 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.