Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Plant & Soil Science

Effect of Phosphorus Management and Drought Mitigating Strategies on Yield and Economics of Rainfed Chickpea

Kutala Sai Pavan; Rajesh Singh; Thakur Indu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to find out the Phosphorous and drought mitigating strategies on yield and economics of Chickpea (var. RVG-202) with the different levels of Phosphorus (40, 50, 60 P2O5 kg/ha) and with the application of Drought mitigating strategies applied at pre-flowering and pod formation stage) respectively, at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India. The soil of the experimental plot was sandy loam in texture, nearly neutral in soil reaction (pH 7.1), low in organic carbon (0.28%), available N (225 kg/ha), available P (19.50 kg/ha) and available K (92.00 kg/ha). The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design, with ten treatments and replicated thrice. Results obtained that there was a significant increase in yield attributes viz., Seed yield (2332.00 kg/ha), Straw yield (4571.33 kg/ha) and Harvest index (33.51%) were recorded with the application of P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spray. However, Maximum Gross return (124481.70 INR/ha), net return (89064.67 INR/ha) and B: C ratio (2.51) was recorded with the application of P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spray. Therefore, it is concluded that the application of P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spray was more productive and economically feasible.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The input combination increased chickpea Seed yield to 2332.00 kg/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
RVG-202e1
Treatment
P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
Seed yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2332.00 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in yield attributes viz., Seed yield (2332.00 kg/ha), Straw yield (4571.33 kg/ha) and Harvest index (33.51%) were recorded with the application of P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The input combination increased chickpea Straw yield to 4571.33 kg/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
RVG-202e1
Treatment
P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
Straw yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
4571.33 kg/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in yield attributes viz., Seed yield (2332.00 kg/ha), Straw yield (4571.33 kg/ha) and Harvest index (33.51%) were recorded with the application of P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The input combination increased chickpea Harvest index to 33.51%.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
RVG-202e1
Treatment
P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
33.51%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant increase in yield attributes viz., Seed yield (2332.00 kg/ha), Straw yield (4571.33 kg/ha) and Harvest index (33.51%) were recorded with the application of P2O5 60kg/ha + 25kg ZnSO4/ha + 1%KCl +0.5%sodium selenite spray”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The input combination gave maximum Gross return of 124481.70 INR/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
Gross returne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
124481.70 INR/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum Gross return (124481.70 INR/ha), net return (89064.67 INR/ha) and B: C ratio (2.51) was recorded with the application of P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The input combination gave maximum net return of 89064.67 INR/ha.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
89064.67 INR/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum Gross return (124481.70 INR/ha), net return (89064.67 INR/ha) and B: C ratio (2.51) was recorded with the application of P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The input combination gave maximum B: C ratio of 2.51.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
B: C ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2.51e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum Gross return (124481.70 INR/ha), net return (89064.67 INR/ha) and B: C ratio (2.51) was recorded with the application of P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1235 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude this input combination was productive and economically feasible.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spraye0
Outcome
more productive and economically feasiblee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of P2O5 60 kg /ha+ 25 kg ZnSO4/ ha + 1 % KCl + 0.5 % sodium selenite spray was more productive and economically feasible.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1405 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (var. RVG-202)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 121–144 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 33 positive, 1 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

disodium selenite · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium chloride · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.