Paper · 2021 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain

Muhammad Zain; Zhuanyun Si; Jinsai Chen; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

To propose an appropriate nitrogen application mode and suitable drip irrigation lateral spacing, a field experiment was conducted during 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons to quantify the different drip irrigation lateral spacings and nitrogen fertigation strategies effects on winter wheat growth, yield, and water use efficiency (WUE) in the North China Plain (NCP). The experiment consisted of three drip irrigation lateral spacing (LS) (40, 60, and 80 cm, referred to as D40, D60, and D80 respectively) and three percentage splits of nitrogen application modes (NAM) (basal and top dressing application ratio as 50:50 (N50:50), 25:75 (N25:75), and 0:100 (N0-100) respectively). The experimental findings depicted that yield and its components, and WUE were markedly affected by LS and NAM. Fertigation of winter wheat at N25:75 NAM notably (P<0.05) increased the grain yield by 4.88%, 1.83% and 8.03%, 4.61%, and WUE by 3.10%, 3.18% and 5.37%, 7.82%, compared with those at NAM N50:50 and N0:100 in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons, respectively. LS D40 appeared very fruitful in terms of soil moisture and nitrogen distribution, WUE, grain yield, and yield components than that of other LS levels. The maximum grain yield (8.73 and 9.40 t ha-1) and WUE (1.70 and 1.95 kg m-3) were obtained under D40N25:75 during both growing seasons, which mainly due to that all main yield components in D40N25:75 treatment, such as spikes per unit area, 1000-grain weight, and grains per spike were significantly higher as compared to other treatments. The outcomes of this research may provide a scientific basis of lateral spacing and nitrogen fertigation management for the production of drip-irrigated winter wheat in NCP.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017-2018, N25:75 increased grain yield by 4.88% relative to N50:50 and by 1.83% relative to N0:100 (P<0.05).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N25:75 NAMe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.88%, 1.83%e1
Qualifier
P<0.05e1
Comparator
N50:50 and N0:100e1
Setting
2017-2018e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertigation of winter wheat at N25:75 NAM notably (P<0.05) increased the grain yield by 4.88%, 1.83% and 8.03%, 4.61%, and WUE by 3.10%, 3.18% and 5.37%, 7.82%, compared with those at NAM N50:50 and N0:100 in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017-2018, N25:75 increased WUE by 3.10% relative to N50:50 and by 3.18% relative to N0:100 (P<0.05).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N25:75 NAMe1
Outcome
WUEe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.10%, 3.18%e1
Qualifier
P<0.05e1
Comparator
N50:50 and N0:100e1
Setting
2017-2018e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertigation of winter wheat at N25:75 NAM notably (P<0.05) increased the grain yield by 4.88%, 1.83% and 8.03%, 4.61%, and WUE by 3.10%, 3.18% and 5.37%, 7.82%, compared with those at NAM N50:50 and N0:100 in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018-2019, N25:75 increased grain yield by 8.03% relative to N50:50 and by 4.61% relative to N0:100 (P<0.05).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N25:75 NAMe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.03%, 4.61%e1
Qualifier
P<0.05e1
Comparator
N50:50 and N0:100e1
Setting
2018-2019e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertigation of winter wheat at N25:75 NAM notably (P<0.05) increased the grain yield by 4.88%, 1.83% and 8.03%, 4.61%, and WUE by 3.10%, 3.18% and 5.37%, 7.82%, compared with those at NAM N50:50 and N0:100 in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2018-2019, N25:75 increased WUE by 5.37% relative to N50:50 and by 7.82% relative to N0:100 (P<0.05).

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N25:75 NAMe1
Outcome
WUEe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.37%, 7.82%e1
Qualifier
P<0.05e1
Comparator
N50:50 and N0:100e1
Setting
2018-2019e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertigation of winter wheat at N25:75 NAM notably (P<0.05) increased the grain yield by 4.88%, 1.83% and 8.03%, 4.61%, and WUE by 3.10%, 3.18% and 5.37%, 7.82%, compared with those at NAM N50:50 and N0:100 in 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 growing seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1062 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral spacing D40 gave soil moisture and nitrogen distribution, WUE and grain yield that appeared very fruitful compared with other lateral spacings.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
LS D40e2
Outcome
soil moisture and nitrogen distribution, WUE, grain yielde2
Direction
very fruitfule2
Comparator
other LS levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“LS D40 appeared very fruitful in terms of soil moisture and nitrogen distribution, WUE, grain yield, and yield components than that of other LS levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lateral spacing D40 gave yield components that appeared very fruitful compared with other lateral spacings.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
LS D40e2
Outcome
yield componentse2
Direction
very fruitfule2
Comparator
other LS levelse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“LS D40 appeared very fruitful in terms of soil moisture and nitrogen distribution, WUE, grain yield, and yield components than that of other LS levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under D40N25:75 the maximum grain yield was 8.73 and 9.40 t ha-1 across both growing seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
D40N25:75e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Value
8.73 and 9.40 t ha-1e3
Qualifier
during both growing seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum grain yield (8.73 and 9.40 t ha-1) and WUE (1.70 and 1.95 kg m-3) were obtained under D40N25:75 during both growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under D40N25:75 the maximum WUE was 1.70 and 1.95 kg m-3 across both growing seasons.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
D40N25:75e3
Outcome
WUEe3
Direction
maximume3
Value
1.70 and 1.95 kg m-3e3
Qualifier
during both growing seasonse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e3

“The maximum grain yield (8.73 and 9.40 t ha-1) and WUE (1.70 and 1.95 kg m-3) were obtained under D40N25:75 during both growing seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under D40N25:75 spikes per unit area, 1000-grain weight and grains per spike were significantly higher than under other treatments.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
D40N25:75e4
Outcome
spikes per unit area, 1000-grain weight, and grains per spikee4
Direction
significantly highere4
Comparator
other treatmentse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e4

“all main yield components in D40N25:75 treatment, such as spikes per unit area, 1000-grain weight, and grains per spike were significantly higher as compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1555 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and its components, and WUE, were markedly affected by lateral spacing and nitrogen application mode.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
LS and NAMe5
Outcome
yield and its components, and WUEe5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Suitable nitrogen application mode and lateral spacing for drip-irrigated winter wheat in North China Plain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–107 · show in text ↑
e5

“yield and its components, and WUE were markedly affected by LS and NAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–798 · show in text ↑

density · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 88 positive, 13 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.