Paper · 2020 · Journal of Agriculture and Forestry University

Assessment of site specific nutrient management on the productivity of wheat at Bhairahawa, Nepal

M. Yadav; S. K. Sah; A. P. Regmi; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Low and unbalanced fertilizer application rate are the major factors contributing to the poor yield of wheat in Nepal. The Site Specific Nutrient Management (SSNM) provides the field specific recommendations in a cost effective and precise manner. A field experiment was done at National Wheat Research Program (NWRP), Bhairahawa, Rupandehi, Nepal during 2019- 20 to evaluate the site specific nutrient management approaches in order to enhance wheat productivity. The SSNM dose was determined at NWRP by using omission plot techniques. The calculated SSNM dose (148:65:71 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1), was compared with SSNM + Zn + B, (148:65:71:5:1 N: P2O5:K2O Zn : B kg ha-1), Research recommended dose (RRD, 150:50:50 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1); National recommended dose (NRD, 100:50:25 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1), Nutrients expert dose (NED,110:50:73 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1), and farmers dose (FD, 80: 40:15 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1) in a RCB design with four replications. The data on growth, yield attributes and yield were collected and analyzed using Genstat Statistical package. Results showed that research recommended dose (RRD) along with SSNM dose and SSNM +Zn +B were statistically similar (p>0.05), but these treatments were comparatively superior over rest of the treatments for yield attributes and yield. Hence it can be concluded that wheat yield can be improved through adoption of SSNM and RRD of fertilizers at Bhairahawa condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The calculated SSNM dose from omission plot techniques was 148:65:71 N:P2O5:K2O kg/ha.

Outcome
calculated SSNM dosee0
Value
148:65:71 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“The calculated SSNM dose (148:65:71 N: P2O5:K2O kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–593 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RRD, SSNM and SSNM+Zn+B gave statistically similar results.

Treatment
research recommended dose (RRD) along with SSNM dose and SSNM +Zn +Be0
Outcome
statistically similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“research recommended dose (RRD) along with SSNM dose and SSNM +Zn +B were statistically similar (p>0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RRD, SSNM and SSNM+Zn+B were superior to the other treatments for yield attributes and yield.

Treatment
research recommended dose (RRD) along with SSNM dose and SSNM +Zn +Be0
Outcome
yield attributes and yielde1
Direction
superiore1
Comparator
rest of the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“research recommended dose (RRD) along with SSNM dose and SSNM +Zn +B were statistically similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1177 · show in text ↑
e1

“these treatments were comparatively superior over rest of the treatments for yield attributes and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1295 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude wheat yield can be improved by adopting SSNM and RRD at Bhairahawa.

Treatment
SSNM and RRD of fertilizerse0
Outcome
wheat yield can be improvede0
Setting
Bhairahawae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat yield can be improved through adoption of SSNM and RRD of fertilizers at Bhairahawa condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1427 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 72 positive, 82 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 79 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.