Paper · 2022 · Indonesian Journal of Agricultural Science

THE EFFECTS OF BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL FERTILIZER SOURCES ON THE PRODUCTION AND QUALITY OF SUNFLOWER

Maryam Zamanian; Mohammad Yazdandoost

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Bio-fertilizers improve nutrient availability and reduce the need to use chemical fertilizers and hold a great promise to increase crop yields. To study the effects of different nutrition systems, this research evaluated the individual and combined effects of bio-fertilizers and compared their efficiency with nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) chemical fertilizers on the yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in the 2017–2018 crop year in Hamedan, Iran. The field experiment included a combination of two factorial experiments, consisting of (a) the application of chemical nitrogen (N0=0, N1=45, N2=90 kg ha-1) and phosphorus (P0=0, P1=40, P2=80 kg ha-1) fertilizers, and (b) the application of N-fixing bacteria Azospirillum and Azotobacter (BN0=0, BN1=0.5, BN2=1 L ha-1), and P-solubilizing bacteria Pseudomonas and Bacillus (BP0=0, BP1=0.5, BP2=1 L ha-1) bio-fertilizers. Each experiment used a 3×3 design with nine treatments and arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. Results indicated that the chemical N and P fertilizers significantly increased the grain yield, thousand-grain weight, plant dry weight, protein percentage, and harvest index. Furthermore, bio-fertilizers significantly increased the grain yield and harvest index. The application of bio-fertilizers with N-fixing bacteria and P-solubilizing bacteria improved the growth and yield characteristics of sunflower. Sunflower oil yield was similar among all treatments, ranged from 2.22 to 5.7 t ha-1. Grain yield ranged from 5.12 to 5.88 t ha-1. A similar result between treatments with the chemical and bio-fertilizers suggests that bio-fertilizers are potential alternatives to chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical N and P fertilizers significantly increased grain yield, thousand-grain weight and dry weight.

Taxon
sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)Helianthus annuust0
Treatment
chemical N and P fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yield, thousand-grain weight, plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical N and P fertilizers significantly increased the grain yield, thousand-grain weight, plant dry weight, protein percentage, and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical N and P fertilizers significantly increased protein percentage and harvest index.

Taxon
sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)Helianthus annuust0
Treatment
chemical N and P fertilizerse0
Outcome
protein percentage, and harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chemical N and P fertilizers significantly increased the grain yield, thousand-grain weight, plant dry weight, protein percentage, and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bio-fertilizers significantly increased grain yield and harvest index.

Taxon
sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)Helianthus annuust0
Treatment
bio-fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain yield and harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bio-fertilizers significantly increased the grain yield and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-fixing and P-solubilizing bio-fertilizers improved sunflower growth and yield.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
bio-fertilizers with N-fixing bacteria and P-solubilizing bacteriae0
Outcome
growth and yield characteristicse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“bio-fertilizers with N-fixing bacteria and P-solubilizing bacteria improved the growth and yield characteristics of sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1293–1418 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunflower oil yield was similar among treatments.

Taxon
SunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
all treatmentse0
Outcome
oil yielde0
Direction
similare0
Value
2.22 to 5.7 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sunflower oil yield was similar among all treatments, ranged from 2.22 to 5.7 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1504 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield ranged from 5.12 to 5.88 t ha-1.

Taxon
sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)Helianthus annuust0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Value
5.12 to 5.88 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield ranged from 5.12 to 5.88 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1549 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–412 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The similar treatment results suggest bio-fertilizers may replace chemical fertilizers.

Taxon
sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)Helianthus annuust0
Outcome
bio-fertilizers are potential alternatives to chemical fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar result between treatments with the chemical and bio-fertilizers suggests that bio-fertilizers are potential alternatives to chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–412 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

81 papers: 79 positive, 2 negative or no effect

78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

inoculation · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 48 positive, 7 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

196 papers: 182 positive, 14 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

192 papers more in this group

See all 196 papers →

fertilization · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

365 papers: 344 positive, 21 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

361 papers more in this group

See all 365 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

25 papers: 25 positive, 0 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.