Paper · 2022 · Frontiers in Plant Science

The molecular mechanism on suppression of climacteric fruit ripening with postharvest wax coating treatment via transcriptome

Yajing Si; Tianxing Lv; Hongjian Li; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
8
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wax coating is an important means to maintain fruit quality and extend fruit shelf life, especially for climacteric fruits, such as apples ( Malus domestica ). Here, we found that wax coating could inhibit ethylene production, chlorophyll degradation, and carotenoid synthesis, but the molecular mechanism remains unclear. The regulatory mechanism of wax coating on apple fruit ripening was determined by subjecting wax-treated apple fruits to transcriptome analysis. RNA-seq revealed that 1,137 and 1,398 genes were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. These differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were shown to be related to plant hormones, such as ethylene, auxin, abscisic acid, and gibberellin, as well as genes involved in chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid biosynthesis. Moreover, we found that some genes related to the wax synthesis process also showed differential expression after the wax coating treatment. Among the DEGs obtained from RNA-seq analysis, 15 were validated by quantitative RT-PCR, confirming the results from RNA-seq analysis. RNA-seq and qRT-PCR of pear ( Pyrus ussuriensis ) showed similar changes after wax treatment. Our data suggest that wax coating treatment inhibits fruit ripening through ethylene synthesis and signal transduction, chlorophyll metabolism, and carotenoid synthesis pathways and that waxing inhibits endogenous wax production. These results provide new insights into the inhibition of fruit ripening by wax coating.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax coating inhibited ethylene production in apples.

Treatment
wax coatinge0
Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wax coating could inhibit ethylene production, chlorophyll degradation, and carotenoid synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–276 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples ( Malus domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax coating inhibited chlorophyll degradation in apples.

Treatment
wax coatinge0
Outcome
chlorophyll degradatione0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wax coating could inhibit ethylene production, chlorophyll degradation, and carotenoid synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–276 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples ( Malus domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax coating inhibited carotenoid synthesis in apples.

Treatment
wax coatinge0
Outcome
carotenoid synthesise0
Direction
inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wax coating could inhibit ethylene production, chlorophyll degradation, and carotenoid synthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–276 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples ( Malus domestica )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax coating upregulated 1,137 genes in apple fruit.

Treatment
wax coatingt0
Outcome
genese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
1,137e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RNA-seq revealed that 1,137 and 1,398 genes were upregulated and downregulated, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“wax coating on apple fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax coating downregulated 1,398 genes in apple fruit.

Treatment
wax coatingt0
Outcome
genese0
Direction
downregulatede0
Value
1,398e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RNA-seq revealed that 1,137 and 1,398 genes were upregulated and downregulated, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“wax coating on apple fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–386 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differentially expressed genes related to plant hormone and pigment pathways.

Compound
ethylene, auxin, abscisic acid, and gibberelline0
Outcome
differentially expressed genese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were shown to be related to plant hormones, such as ethylene, auxin, abscisic acid, and gibberellin, as well as genes involved in chlorophyll degradation and carotenoid biosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wax treatment changed expression of genes related to wax synthesis.

Treatment
wax coating treatmente0
Outcome
genes related to the wax synthesis processe0
Direction
differential expressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“some genes related to the wax synthesis process also showed differential expression after the wax coating treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–386 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

qRT-PCR validated 15 RNA-seq differential expression results.

Outcome
DEGse0
Value
15e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the DEGs obtained from RNA-seq analysis, 15 were validated by quantitative RT-PCR, confirming the results from RNA-seq analysis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–386 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pear showed similar transcript changes after wax treatment.

Treatment
wax treatmente0
Outcome
RNA-seq and qRT-PCRe0
Direction
similar changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RNA-seq and qRT-PCR of pear ( Pyrus ussuriensis ) showed similar changes after wax treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1158 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that waxing inhibits endogenous wax production.

Treatment
waxinge0
Outcome
endogenous wax productione0
Direction
inhibitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“waxing inhibits endogenous wax production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–386 · show in text ↑

storage · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

storage · physiology: pigments · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.