Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Wheat (Triticum aestivum) crop response to irrigation scheduling and super absorbent polymers

SHWETA; MEENA SEWHAG; RENU MUNJAL; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at research farm of CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana during winter (rabi) season 2018–19 and 2019–20 with an objective to study the polymers with irrigation effect on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop. The research was done in a split-plot design with four irrigation [(No irrigation (I0), One irrigation at CRI stage, crown root initiation stage; (I1), Two irrigation at CRI, Booting (I2), Three irrigation at CRI, Booting, milking (I3)] and three polymer treatments [(No polymers (P0), Gondkatira @5 kg/ha (P1), Pusa Hydrogel @2.5 kg/ha (P2)] in the main and subplot respectively. The wheat seed yield decreased by 11.90% from I3 to I2, 17.12% from I3 to I1, and 33.74% from I3 to I0. The polymer treatment was used to increase the wheat seed yield. The yield was increased by 7.41% and 1.15% by application of hydrogel and gondkatira over no polymer. The minimum water productivity was registered under three irrigations. The application of gondkatira in wheat increased the water productivity by 8.09% while hydrogel 11.56%. Water stress or no irrigation has a lower Fv/Fm (Maximum quantum efficiency of PS II) (0.73) ratio than to no stress or three irrigations (0.75).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seed yield was 11.90% lower under two rather than three irrigations.

Treatment
I2e0
Outcome
wheat seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.90%e0
Comparator
I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat seed yield decreased by 11.90% from I3 to I2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seed yield was 17.12% lower under one rather than three irrigations.

Treatment
I1e0
Outcome
wheat seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17.12%e0
Comparator
I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat seed yield decreased by 11.90% from I3 to I2, 17.12% from I3 to I1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seed yield was 33.74% lower without irrigation than under three irrigations.

Treatment
I0e0
Outcome
wheat seed yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
33.74%e0
Comparator
I3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat seed yield decreased by 11.90% from I3 to I2, 17.12% from I3 to I1, and 33.74% from I3 to I0”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel increased wheat yield by 7.41% relative to no polymer.

Treatment
hydrogele0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.41%e0
Comparator
no polymere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield was increased by 7.41% and 1.15% by application of hydrogel and gondkatira over no polymer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gondkatira increased wheat yield by 1.15% relative to no polymer.

Treatment
gondkatirae0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.15%e0
Comparator
no polymere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield was increased by 7.41% and 1.15% by application of hydrogel and gondkatira over no polymer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations produced the lowest wheat water productivity.

Treatment
three irrigationse0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
minimume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The minimum water productivity was registered under three irrigations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gondkatira increased wheat water productivity by 8.09%.

Treatment
gondkatirae0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.09%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of gondkatira in wheat increased the water productivity by 8.09%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel increased wheat water productivity by 11.56%.

Treatment
hydrogele0
Outcome
water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of gondkatira in wheat increased the water productivity by 8.09% while hydrogel 11.56%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 977–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No irrigation gave a lower wheat Fv/Fm ratio, 0.73 versus 0.75 with three irrigations.

Treatment
no irrigatione0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.73e0
Qualifier
0.75e0
Comparator
three irrigationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress or no irrigation has a lower Fv/Fm (Maximum quantum efficiency of PS II) (0.73) ratio than to no stress or three irrigations (0.75)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–25 · show in text ↑

other · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

219 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.