Paper · 1976 · HortScience

Photosynthesis and Carbonic Anhydrase Activity in Zn-deficient Peaches Irradiated with Ultraviolet Light1

Fouad M. Basiouny; R. H. Biggs

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Effects of UV-B radiation (280-310 nm) and Zn deficiency on photosynthesis and carbonic anhydrase (CA) activity in peach seedlings ( Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) were studied. Low Zn markedly reduced CA activity; however, the reduction was not proportional to the reduction in leaf Zn content. Zn-deficient leaves irradiated with UV-B had lower CA activity, chlorophyll content, spectral reflectance and rates of photosynthesis. The reduction was more pronounced when leaves were distinctly chlorotic. Higher CA activity was not necessary for maintaining high rates of photosynthesis. Target areas in the leaf for UV-B absorption are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low zinc markedly reduced carbonic anhydrase activity.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
Low Zne0
Outcome
CA activitye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low Zn markedly reduced CA activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduction in carbonic anhydrase activity was not proportional to the reduction in leaf zinc content.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Compound
Zne0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
not proportionale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduction was not proportional to the reduction in leaf Zn content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc deficient leaves irradiated with UV-B had lower carbonic anhydrase activity, chlorophyll content, and spectral reflectance.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
CA activity, chlorophyll content, spectral reflectancee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn-deficient leaves irradiated with UV-B had lower CA activity, chlorophyll content, spectral reflectance and rates of photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc deficient leaves irradiated with UV-B had lower rates of photosynthesis.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
UV-Be0
Outcome
rates of photosynthesise0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn-deficient leaves irradiated with UV-B had lower CA activity, chlorophyll content, spectral reflectance and rates of photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 302–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reductions were more pronounced in distinctly chlorotic leaves.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
leaves were distinctly chlorotice0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction was more pronounced when leaves were distinctly chlorotic.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher carbonic anhydrase activity was not necessary to maintain high photosynthesis rates.

Taxon
PeachesPrunus persicat0
Gene
CAe0
Outcome
high rates of photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher CA activity was not necessary for maintaining high rates of photosynthesis.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–592 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peaches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–70 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: pigments · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.