Paper · 2022 · Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

Effect of sulphur and nitrogen fertilisation on winter wheat in Calcaric Luvisol

Gediminas Staugaitis; Kazimieras Poškus; Zita Brazienė; et al.

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

In 2019-2021, the experiment was carried out with the aim to investigate how sulphur (S) fertiliser rates under different nitrogen (N) fertiliser backgrounds influenced winter wheat grain yield, grain quality, and plant productivity indicators. The winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar 'Janne' was grown in four N background treatments with N 60 , N 120 , N 180 , and N 240 without S fertilisation and also fertilised with S 15 (in all N fertilisation treatments), S 30 (only with N 120 and N 240 ), and S 60 (only with N 240 ). The results showed that S fertilisation increased the wheat grain yield significantly in individual research years and only in the plots fertilised with higher N rates. N fertilisers increased the protein content, sedimentation, and gluten content of the grain, while S fertilisers only in one year and only in the N 180 fertilisation treatment. The results of experiment showed that the N:S ratio for the winter wheat at the BBCH 30 growth stage was in the range of 8-16, and at the BBCH 65 it was in the range of 9-19 indicating that the winter wheat was optimally or even more than optimally supplied with S.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilization significantly increased grain yield in some years at higher nitrogen rates.

Treatment
S fertilisatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in individual research years and only in the plots fertilised with higher N ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S fertilisation increased the wheat grain yield significantly in individual research years and only in the plots fertilised with higher N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer increased grain protein, sedimentation, and gluten.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N fertiliserse0
Outcome
protein content, sedimentation, and gluten content of the graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilisers increased the protein content, sedimentation, and gluten content of the grain, while S fertilisers only in one year and only in the N 180 fertilisation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur fertilizer increased grain quality traits only in one year at N 180.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
S fertiliserse0
Outcome
protein content, sedimentation, and gluten content of the graine0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
only in one year and only in the N 180 fertilisation treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N fertilisers increased the protein content, sedimentation, and gluten content of the grain, while S fertilisers only in one year and only in the N 180 fertilisation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–60 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N:S ratio at BBCH 30 was 8-16.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
BBCH 30e0
Outcome
N:S ratioe0
Value
8-16e0
Qualifier
optimally or even more than optimally supplied with Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N:S ratio for the winter wheat at the BBCH 30 growth stage was in the range of 8-16, and at the BBCH 65 it was in the range of 9-19 indicating that the winter wheat was optimally or even more than optimally supplied with S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1147 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N:S ratio at BBCH 65 was 9-19.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
BBCH 65e0
Outcome
N:S ratioe0
Value
9-19e0
Qualifier
optimally or even more than optimally supplied with Se0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the N:S ratio for the winter wheat at the BBCH 30 growth stage was in the range of 8-16, and at the BBCH 65 it was in the range of 9-19 indicating that the winter wheat was optimally or even more than optimally supplied with S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1147 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.