Paper · 2000 · Journal of Plant Production

INFLUENCE OF SOME MACRO- AND MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZATION ON PRODUCTIVITY AND QUALITY OF FORAGE SORGHUM

A. Osman,; T. Abd El-Aziz; Amal Helmy

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC), to study the influence of macronutrients fertilization of N (60, 90 and 120 Kg N/fed), P (10, 20 and 30 Kg P2O5/fed), K ( 25, 50 and 75 Kg K2O/fed) as well as micronutrients treatments of Zn, Fe (0.3 g/l) and their mixture in addition to untreated control on the productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102 during 1998 and 1999 growing seasons. The results showed that application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization as kg/fed. resulted in a significant increase of plant height, leaf area, dry forage yield, protein, fiber and ash yields of the three cuts and increased Zn and Fe uptake. Zn and Fe application mixture as foliar spray led to significant increase of the all studied characters at the three cuts. At the same time, the highest plant height, leaf area, dry forage, protein, fiber and ash yield of the three cuts and Zn and Fe uptake were obtained by 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture. The dry forage yield showed positive and high by significant correlation with all characters under study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization significantly increased plant height, leaf area and dry forage yield of forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
90N+20P+50K fertilizatione1
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, dry forage yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization as kg/fed. resulted in a significant increase of plant height, leaf area, dry forage yield, protein, fiber and ash yields of the three cuts and increased Zn and Fe uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization significantly increased protein, fiber and ash yields of forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
90N+20P+50K fertilizatione1
Outcome
protein, fiber and ash yieldse1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization as kg/fed. resulted in a significant increase of plant height, leaf area, dry forage yield, protein, fiber and ash yields of the three cuts and increased Zn and Fe uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization increased Zn and Fe uptake in forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
90N+20P+50K fertilizatione1
Outcome
Zn and Fe uptakee1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 90N+20P+50K fertilization as kg/fed. resulted in a significant increase of plant height, leaf area, dry forage yield, protein, fiber and ash yields of the three cuts and increased Zn and Fe uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–717 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn and Fe mixture applied as foliar spray significantly increased all studied characters of forage sorghum at the three cuts.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
Zn and Fe application mixture as foliar spraye3
Outcome
all studied characterse3
Direction
increasee3
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
e3

“Zn and Fe application mixture as foliar spray led to significant increase of the all studied characters at the three cuts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture gave the highest plant height, leaf area and dry forage yield of forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixturee4
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, dry foragee4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
e4

“At the same time, the highest plant height, leaf area, dry forage, protein, fiber and ash yield of the three cuts and Zn and Fe uptake were obtained by 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture gave the highest protein, fiber and ash yields of the three cuts.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixturee4
Outcome
protein, fiber and ash yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
e4

“At the same time, the highest plant height, leaf area, dry forage, protein, fiber and ash yield of the three cuts and Zn and Fe uptake were obtained by 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture gave the highest Zn and Fe uptake in forage sorghum.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Material
sudan hybrid cultivar 102e2
Treatment
90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixturee4
Outcome
Zn and Fe uptakee4
Direction
higheste4
Setting
Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This work was conducted in Giza Experimental Agricultural Research Station, Agricultural Research Center (ARC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
e4

“At the same time, the highest plant height, leaf area, dry forage, protein, fiber and ash yield of the three cuts and Zn and Fe uptake were obtained by 90 N + 20 P + 50 K with Zn and Fe mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–1035 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry forage yield of forage sorghum was positively and highly correlated with all characters under study.

Taxon
forage sorghume2
Outcome
dry forage yielde5
Direction
positivee5
Comparator
all characters under studye5

Verbatim

e2

“productivity and quality of forage sorghum sudan hybrid cultivar 102”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–443 · show in text ↑
e5

“The dry forage yield showed positive and high by significant correlation with all characters under study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1141 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · growth · SorghumResults differ

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

iron atom · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · SorghumResults agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results

53 papers: 47 positive, 6 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

118 papers: 111 positive, 7 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.