Paper · 2015 · Research on Crops

Effect of micronutrient fertilization and methods of application on yield and quality of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) in sub-humid southern plains zone

S. K. Choudhary; A. K. Mathur; P. Singh

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during two consequent years (kharif) of 2010 and 2011 to assess the effect of micronutrient fertilization and method of nutrient application on productivity, quality and economics of sorghum. The experiment consisted of 24 treatment combinations and replicated three times in split plot design with three methods of nutrient application (soil application, foliar spray and soil+foliar application) and eight micronutrient treatments: Control–(RDF-NPK), RDF+Fe, RDF+Zn, RDF+B, RDF+Fe+Zn, RDF+Fe+B, RDF+Zn+B and RDF+Fe+Zn+B. The results of the study showed that method of nutrient application through soil+foliar spray significantly increased grain (13.88 and 12.13%), stover (10.68 and 8.58%) and biological yield (11.33 and 9.31%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (9.23 and 7.53%) with combined application of micronutrient (RDF+Fe+Zn+B) significantly increased grain, stover and biological yield (25.44, 15.52 and 17.45%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (20.32%) and protein content (8.98%) in sorghum crop on pooled data basis over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar application significantly increased sorghum grain yield by 13.88 and 12.13%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil+foliar spraye0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.88 and 12.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“method of nutrient application through soil+foliar spray significantly increased grain (13.88 and 12.13%), stover (10.68 and 8.58%) and biological yield (11.33 and 9.31%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (9.23 and 7.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar application significantly increased sorghum stover yield by 10.68 and 8.58%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil+foliar spraye0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.68 and 8.58%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“method of nutrient application through soil+foliar spray significantly increased grain (13.88 and 12.13%), stover (10.68 and 8.58%) and biological yield (11.33 and 9.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar application significantly increased sorghum biological yield by 11.33 and 9.31%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
soil+foliar spraye0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.33 and 9.31%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“method of nutrient application through soil+foliar spray significantly increased grain (13.88 and 12.13%), stover (10.68 and 8.58%) and biological yield (11.33 and 9.31%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil plus foliar application significantly increased sorghum chlorophyll content at 60 DAS by 9.23 and 7.53%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage
60 DASe0
Treatment
soil+foliar spraye0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.23 and 7.53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“method of nutrient application through soil+foliar spray significantly increased grain (13.88 and 12.13%), stover (10.68 and 8.58%) and biological yield (11.33 and 9.31%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (9.23 and 7.53%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF+Fe+Zn+B significantly increased pooled sorghum grain yield by 25.44% over control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
RDF+Fe+Zn+Be0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.44e0
Qualifier
on pooled data basise0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of micronutrient (RDF+Fe+Zn+B) significantly increased grain, stover and biological yield (25.44, 15.52 and 17.45%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (20.32%) and protein content (8.98%) in sorghum crop on pooled data basis over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF+Fe+Zn+B significantly increased pooled sorghum stover yield by 15.52% over control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
RDF+Fe+Zn+Be0
Outcome
stovere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.52e0
Qualifier
on pooled data basise0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of micronutrient (RDF+Fe+Zn+B) significantly increased grain, stover and biological yield (25.44, 15.52 and 17.45%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (20.32%) and protein content (8.98%) in sorghum crop on pooled data basis over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF+Fe+Zn+B significantly increased pooled sorghum biological yield by 17.45% over control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
RDF+Fe+Zn+Be0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17.45%e0
Qualifier
on pooled data basise0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of micronutrient (RDF+Fe+Zn+B) significantly increased grain, stover and biological yield (25.44, 15.52 and 17.45%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (20.32%) and protein content (8.98%) in sorghum crop on pooled data basis over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF+Fe+Zn+B significantly increased pooled sorghum chlorophyll content at 60 DAS by 20.32% over control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Organ / stage
60 DASe0
Treatment
RDF+Fe+Zn+Be0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.32%e0
Qualifier
on pooled data basise0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of micronutrient (RDF+Fe+Zn+B) significantly increased grain, stover and biological yield (25.44, 15.52 and 17.45%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (20.32%) and protein content (8.98%) in sorghum crop on pooled data basis over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF+Fe+Zn+B significantly increased pooled sorghum protein content by 8.98% over control.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
RDF+Fe+Zn+Be0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.98%e0
Qualifier
on pooled data basise0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of micronutrient (RDF+Fe+Zn+B) significantly increased grain, stover and biological yield (25.44, 15.52 and 17.45%) and chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (20.32%) and protein content (8.98%) in sorghum crop on pooled data basis over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–1078 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · SorghumResults differ

38 papers: 33 positive, 5 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · SorghumPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

iron atom · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

25 papers: 21 positive, 4 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: pigments · SorghumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · quality: protein · SorghumResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · SorghumPositive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.