Paper · 2021 · International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology

Response of Microbial Consortia Culture Inoculation to Soil Moisture Status, Proline and Yield of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolar L.)

N. A. Kakde; G. R. Hanwate; P. H. G19665901

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Plant secondary metabolites play vital role in plant stress response. In this study we investigated root colonization of sorghum (Sorghum bicolar) infected by two different types of microbial consortia culture (MC1 & MC2) leads to alteration in the biosynthesis of secondary plant metabolites including phytoharmones and osmolyte proline under drought stress. The promising microbial consortia procured from authentic sources (Department of Microbiology CRIDA, Hyderabad and that consortia culture contain mixture of effective beneficial microbes such as N-fixing bacteria, PGPR and mycorrhizal fungi). Application of microbial consortia culture through soil application and seed treatment to sorghum along with Recommended Dose Of Fertilizer (RDF) showed increased soil moisture content and chlorophyll pigments as compared to uninoculated controls as well as drought stressed plants. Proline content was increased in plants inoculated with microbial consortia under both normal as well as drought conditions. An obvious increase grain yield and dry matter yield through application of microbial consortia with soil application and seed treatments in normal and drought condition respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial consortia with fertilizer increased soil moisture content relative to uninoculated and drought-stressed controls.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
microbial consortia culture through soil application and seed treatmente0
Interactor
microbial consortia culturee0symbiont
Outcome
soil moisture contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of microbial consortia culture through soil application and seed treatment to sorghum along with Recommended Dose Of Fertilizer (RDF) showed increased soil moisture content and chlorophyll pigments as compared to uninoculated controls as well as drought stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial consortia with fertilizer increased sorghum chlorophyll pigments relative to controls.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
microbial consortia culture through soil application and seed treatmente0
Interactor
microbial consortia culturee0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll pigmentse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
uninoculated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of microbial consortia culture through soil application and seed treatment to sorghum along with Recommended Dose Of Fertilizer (RDF) showed increased soil moisture content and chlorophyll pigments as compared to uninoculated controls as well as drought stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased proline content under normal and drought conditions.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
inoculated with microbial consortiae0
Interactor
microbial consortiae0symbiont
Outcome
Proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under both normal as well as drought conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline content was increased in plants inoculated with microbial consortia under both normal as well as drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1009 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial consortia application increased grain yield.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
application of microbial consortia with soil application and seed treatmentse0
Interactor
microbial consortiae0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
normale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An obvious increase grain yield and dry matter yield through application of microbial consortia with soil application and seed treatments in normal and drought condition respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial consortia application increased dry matter yield under drought.

Taxon
SorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
application of microbial consortia with soil application and seed treatmentse0
Interactor
microbial consortiae0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
drought conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An obvious increase grain yield and dry matter yield through application of microbial consortia with soil application and seed treatments in normal and drought condition respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1193 · show in text ↑
t0

“Yield of Sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–105 · show in text ↑

application · physiology: pigments · SorghumPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · SorghumPositive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

seed treatment · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

36 papers: 34 positive, 2 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

76 papers: 68 positive, 8 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

seed treatment · quality: grain · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.