Paper · 2004 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

INFLUENCE OF GYPSUM AND NPK RATES APPLICATION ON YIELD AND SOME NUTRIENTS UPTAKE OF PEANUT PLANTS GROWN IN NEWLY RECLAIMED SANDY SOIL

M. Nasef,

10
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003 to study the influence of gypsum and NPK rates' application on yield and some nutrients uptake by peanut crop in newly reclaimed soil under using sorinker irrigation system. Each experiments were designed in randomized complete block design. Each experiment included 7 treatments where each treatment replicated three times. The obtained results could be summarized as follows: 1- The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates (30 kg N, 30 kg p < /em>zOs. 24 kg K20 fed,1) or application of gypsum individually or NPK at the recommended rates individually gave significant increases to the studied parameters involved 100-seed weight, pod yield, straw yield and shiJlin~ percentage. The superiority was found with the application gypsum at 500 kg fed' plus NPK at the recommended rates. 2- The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates showed highly significant increases the control or the individual addition of gypsum or NPK at the recommended rates in the parameters dry weight of 100-pods, dry weight 100- seeds. seed and straw yield. Also, the superiority was gypsum application 500 kg fe-~" ).IIUS NPK recommended rates. 3- The previous treatment, the gypsum application individually or NPK at the recommended rates individually gave a significant increase over the control in N, P and K uptake of seed and straw. 4- Oil and protein yields were a highly significant increase higher than the control due to applying gypsum plus NPK recommended rates or application of gypsum individually or NPK at the recommended rates individually. The application of gypsum at the rate 250 kg fed,1 + half NPK recommended rates gave the lowest values with respect to 011 and protein yield. 5- Generally, the results revealed that the sprinker irrigation system in newly reclaimed sar.dy soils with gypsum application (500 kg fed" + NPK recommended rates) on peanut crop to achieve the highest pods yield fed,1, shilling percentage. N. P and K-uotake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates significantly increased 100-seed weight, pod yield and straw yield of peanut.

Treatment
gypsum and NPK at the recommended ratese1
Outcome
100-seed weight, pod yield, straw yielde1
Direction
significant increasese1
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“1- The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates (30 kg N, 30 kg p < /em>zOs. 24 kg K20 fed,1) or application of gypsum individually or NPK at the recommended rates individually gave significant increases to the studied parameters involved 100-seed weight, pod yield, straw yield and shiJlin~ percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates significantly increased shiJlin~ percentage of peanut.

Treatment
gypsum and NPK at the recommended ratese1
Outcome
shiJlin~ percentagee1
Direction
significant increasese1
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“1- The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates (30 kg N, 30 kg p < /em>zOs. 24 kg K20 fed,1) or application of gypsum individually or NPK at the recommended rates individually gave significant increases to the studied parameters involved 100-seed weight, pod yield, straw yield and shiJlin~ percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–816 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The superiority of gypsum at 500 kg per feddan plus NPK at the recommended rates was found for peanut.

Treatment
gypsum at 500 kg fed' plus NPK at the recommended ratese2
Outcome
superioritye2
Direction
superioritye2
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“The superiority was found with the application gypsum at 500 kg fed' plus NPK at the recommended rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates highly significantly increased dry weight of 100-pods of peanut over the control.

Treatment
gypsum and NPK at the recommended ratese3
Outcome
dry weight of 100-podse3
Direction
highly significant increasese3
Comparator
the controle3
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates showed highly significant increases the control or the individual addition of gypsum or NPK at the recommended rates in the parameters dry weight of 100-pods, dry weight 100- seeds. seed and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates highly significantly increased dry weight of 100-seeds of peanut over the control.

Treatment
gypsum and NPK at the recommended ratese3
Outcome
dry weight 100- seedse3
Direction
highly significant increasese3
Comparator
the controle3
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates showed highly significant increases the control or the individual addition of gypsum or NPK at the recommended rates in the parameters dry weight of 100-pods, dry weight 100- seeds. seed and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates highly significantly increased seed and straw yield of peanut over the control.

Treatment
gypsum and NPK at the recommended ratese3
Outcome
seed and straw yielde3
Direction
highly significant increasese3
Comparator
the controle3
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates showed highly significant increases the control or the individual addition of gypsum or NPK at the recommended rates in the parameters dry weight of 100-pods, dry weight 100- seeds. seed and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1186 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum applied individually significantly increased N, P and K uptake of peanut seed and straw over the control.

Treatment
gypsum application individuallye4
Outcome
N, P and K uptake of seed and strawe4
Direction
significant increasee4
Comparator
the controle4
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e4

“The previous treatment, the gypsum application individually or NPK at the recommended rates individually gave a significant increase over the control in N, P and K uptake of seed and straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum and NPK at the recommended rates raised oil and protein yields of peanut above the control.

Treatment
gypsum plus NPK recommended ratese5
Outcome
Oil and protein yieldse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
the controle5
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e5

“Oil and protein yields were a highly significant increase higher than the control due to applying gypsum plus NPK recommended rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum at 250 kg per feddan plus half NPK at the recommended rates gave the lowest protein yield of peanut.

Treatment
application of gypsum at the rate 250 kg fed,1 + half NPK recommended ratese6
Outcome
protein yielde6
Direction
lowest valuese6
Qualifier
with respect to 011 and protein yielde6
Setting
Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Statione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experimental were conducted at Ismailia Agricultural Experimental Station through two seasons 2001/2002 and 2002/2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e6

“The application of gypsum at the rate 250 kg fed,1 + half NPK recommended rates gave the lowest values with respect to 011 and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1828 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEANUT PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–97 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum at 500 kg per feddan plus NPK at the recommended rates was recommended for the highest peanut pod yield in newly reclaimed sandy soil under sprinkler irrigation.

Outcome
highest pods yielde7
Setting
NEWLY RECLAIMED SANDY SOILt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e7

“to achieve the highest pods yield fed,1, shilling percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2010–2070 · show in text ↑
e6

“on peanut crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1995–2009 · show in text ↑
t1

“NEWLY RECLAIMED SANDY SOIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–133 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 61 positive, 2 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

lime · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 133 positive, 9 negative or no effect

132 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

lime · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.