Paper · 2022 · Plant Stress

Seed priming upregulates antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems to conferring simulated drought tolerance in wheat seedlings

Mazhar Ul Alam; Masayuki Fujita; Kamrun Nahar; et al.

20
claims
34
verbatim quotes
38
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to understand the protective effect of different priming agents [50 µM salicylic acid (SA), 4 mM ascorbic acid (AsA), and 2.5 mM NaCl] under simulated drought [15% (m/v) polyethylene glycol (PEG-6000)] in wheat. Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition. Enhanced levels of the malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide were evident with higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that disrupted the plant antioxidant defense system. The activities of antioxidant enzymes were also significantly declined under PEG-induced drought stress. Drought also increased methylglyoxal (MG) formation, which aggravated oxidative damage to the next folds. However, priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system. Additionally, increased activities of glyoxalase system enzymes (glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II) controlled the overproduction of MG in drought-stressed wheat seedlings. Indeed, seed priming helps to alleviate drought-induced oxidative damage by modulating the antioxidant defense system. However, AsA provided a better defense to plants against drought stress. Therefore, it can be concluded that priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA, and NaCl confers drought stress tolerance by upregulating antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems, thus ensuring better seedling establishment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated drought increased wheat proline accumulation.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
proline accumulatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated drought lowered wheat relative water content.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated drought caused chlorosis in wheat.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
chlorosise0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated drought inhibited wheat growth.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
growth inhibitione0
Direction
inhibitione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–349 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide levels in wheat.

Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
levels of the malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
Enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced levels of the malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide were evident with higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that disrupted the plant antioxidant defense system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–529 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased reactive oxygen species generation in wheat.

Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
reactive oxygen species (ROS) generatione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that disrupted the plant antioxidant defense system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought disrupted the antioxidant defense system in wheat.

Treatment
Droughtt1
Outcome
plant antioxidant defense systeme0
Direction
disruptede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that disrupted the plant antioxidant defense system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
t1

“Drought caused higher proline accumulation, lower relative water content, chlorosis, and growth inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PEG-induced drought significantly reduced antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
PEG-induced drought stresse0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activities of antioxidant enzymes were also significantly declined under PEG-induced drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought increased methylglyoxal formation in wheat.

Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
methylglyoxal (MG) formatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought also increased methylglyoxal (MG) formation, which aggravated oxidative damage to the next folds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased methylglyoxal formation aggravated wheat oxidative damage.

Compound
methylglyoxal (MG)e0
Outcome
oxidative damagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“methylglyoxal (MG) formation, which aggravated oxidative damage to the next folds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming wheat seeds with SA decreased reactive oxygen species production.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
ROS productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming wheat seeds with AsA decreased reactive oxygen species production.

Treatment
AsAe0
Outcome
ROS productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming wheat seeds with NaCl decreased reactive oxygen species production.

Treatment
NaCle0
Outcome
ROS productione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–916 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming decreased AsA.

Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
AsAe0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming increased glutathione content.

Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
glutathione contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming upregulated the antioxidant defense system.

Treatment
priminge0
Outcome
antioxidant defense systeme0
Direction
upregulatinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA and NaCl decreased ROS production by decreasing AsA, increasing glutathione content, and upregulating the antioxidant defense system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyoxalase I and II enzyme activities rose in drought-stressed wheat seedlings.

Gene
glyoxalase I and glyoxalase IIe0
Outcome
activities of glyoxalase system enzymese0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Additionally, increased activities of glyoxalase system enzymes (glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II) controlled the overproduction of MG in drought-stressed wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1086 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased glyoxalase enzyme activities controlled methylglyoxal overproduction.

Gene
glyoxalase I and glyoxalase IIe0
Outcome
overproduction of MGe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased activities of glyoxalase system enzymes (glyoxalase I and glyoxalase II) controlled the overproduction of MG in drought-stressed wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AsA priming provided better defense against drought stress than the other priming agents.

Treatment
AsAe0
Outcome
defense to plants against drought stresse0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, AsA provided a better defense to plants against drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1278 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–128 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that SA, AsA, and NaCl priming confers drought tolerance and better seedling establishment through antioxidant and glyoxalase systems.

Treatment
priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA, and NaCle0
Outcome
drought stress tolerancee0
Qualifier
upregulating antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“priming wheat seeds with SA, AsA, and NaCl confers drought stress tolerance by upregulating antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems, thus ensuring better seedling establishment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1494 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

27 papers: 6 positive, 21 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

62 papers: 56 positive, 6 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

L-ascorbic acid · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

L-ascorbic acid · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 22 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

seed treatment · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 38 positive, 3 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 65 positive, 5 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

75 papers: 48 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

71 papers more in this group

See all 75 papers →

8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.