Paper · 2022 · Khulna University Studies

DRY MATTER ALLOCATION AND GRAIN YIELD OF WHEAT AS INFLUENCED BY SOLAR RADIATION LEVEL AND PLANT DENSITY

Md. Imran Hossain; Khalid Hasan; Md. Yasin Ali; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

An experiment was conducted from November 2018 to March 2019 to identify the effect of radiation levels and plant population on dry matter allocation and yield of wheat with the variety ‘BARI Gom 25’. The study was set out in the Randomized Complete Block Design with four radiation levels (full sunlight, 75% light, 55% light and 25% light) and three plant densities (160 plants m-2, 200 plants m-2, 230 plants m-2) that replicated thrice. Full sunlight or 75% light in combination with optimal plant density (200 plants m-2) resulted maximum culm dry weight, leaf dry weight, spike dry weight and total dry matter weight plant-1. The numbers of filled grain and unfilled grain plant-1 and yields of grain and straw m-2 were the highest from the above-mentioned combination. The lowest dry weights for culm, leaf, spike, and total dry matter and minimum grain yield and straw yield were obtained from 25% light either alone or in combination with any plant densities indicating the profound influence of light on dry matter production and grain yield of wheat. Therefore, reduced light (up to 25%) and optimal plant density can ensure wheat production without significant yield loss. This finding suggests possibility of wheat cultivation in agroforestry system and light limiting areas in Bangladesh and other parts of the world.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full sun or 75% light with 200 plants m-2 maximized culm, leaf and spike dry weights.

Treatment
Full sunlight or 75% light in combination with optimal plant density (200 plants m-2)e0
Outcome
culm dry weight, leaf dry weight, spike dry weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full sunlight or 75% light in combination with optimal plant density (200 plants m-2) resulted maximum culm dry weight, leaf dry weight, spike dry weight and total dry matter weight plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full sun or 75% light with 200 plants m-2 maximized total plant dry matter.

Treatment
Full sunlight or 75% light in combination with optimal plant density (200 plants m-2)e0
Outcome
total dry matter weight plant-1e0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full sunlight or 75% light in combination with optimal plant density (200 plants m-2) resulted maximum culm dry weight, leaf dry weight, spike dry weight and total dry matter weight plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same light and density combination gave highest filled and unfilled grain counts.

Outcome
filled grain and unfilled grain plant-1e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The numbers of filled grain and unfilled grain plant-1 and yields of grain and straw m-2 were the highest from the above-mentioned combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination gave highest grain and straw yield per square metre.

Outcome
yields of grain and straw m-2e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The numbers of filled grain and unfilled grain plant-1 and yields of grain and straw m-2 were the highest from the above-mentioned combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% light, culm, leaf, spike and total dry weights were lowest.

Treatment
25% lighte0
Outcome
dry weights for culm, leaf, spike, and total dry mattere0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest dry weights for culm, leaf, spike, and total dry matter and minimum grain yield and straw yield were obtained from 25% light either alone or in combination with any plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25% light, grain and straw yields were minimal.

Treatment
25% lighte0
Outcome
grain yield and straw yielde0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest dry weights for culm, leaf, spike, and total dry matter and minimum grain yield and straw yield were obtained from 25% light either alone or in combination with any plant densities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend reduced light up to 25% with optimal plant density for wheat production without significant yield loss.

Outcome
wheat production without significant yield losse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced light (up to 25%) and optimal plant density can ensure wheat production without significant yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 33 positive, 35 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

light · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 46 positive, 39 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

density · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 81 positive, 29 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.