Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive Rabi seasons 2020-21 and 2021-22 at Students’ Instructional Farm of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India, situated at 125.9 meter altitude, 26.491220 North latitude, 80.3070120 East longitude, to study “Impact of irrigation scheduling, moisture conservation practices and nutrient management on performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”. The experiment consisted three irrigation scheduling viz: I1: two irrigations at CRI and Jointing stage, I2: three irrigations at CRI, Jointing and Booting stage and I3: Four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage, two moisture conservation practices viz: M0: without mulching and M1: Organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray and three nutrient management practices viz: N1: 100% RDF (150:60:40 kg ha-1 NPK), N2: 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 and N3: 75% RDF + FYM @ 10.0 t ha-1. The experiment was laid out in double split plot design with three replications. On pooled basis of two years experimentation the results indicated that, four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3) recorded highest value of grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1), straw yield (6651.15 kg ha-1) and harvest index (39.70 %) with profitability in terms of net return (Rs. 83908.79 ha-1), under moisture conservation practices, organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray (M1) recorded significantly highest grain yield (4230.40 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6578.57 kg ha-1). Among the nutrient management treatments, 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) also recorded maximum grain yield (4117.60 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6338.71 kg ha-1) and net return (Rs. 77770.83 ha-1) compared to other treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations (I3) gave the highest grain yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3)e1
- Outcome
- grain yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 4381.60 kg ha-1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e1“four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3) recorded highest value of grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations (I3) gave the highest straw yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3)e2
- Outcome
- straw yielde2
- Direction
- higheste2
- Value
- 6651.15 kg ha-1e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e2“four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3) recorded highest value of grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1), straw yield (6651.15 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations (I3) gave the highest harvest index of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3)e3
- Outcome
- harvest indexe3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 39.70 %e3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e3“four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3) recorded highest value of grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1), straw yield (6651.15 kg ha-1) and harvest index (39.70 %)”
Claim · model-written summary
Four irrigations (I3) gave the highest net return of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3)e4
- Outcome
- net returne4
- Direction
- higherinferrede4
- Value
- Rs. 83908.79 ha-1e4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e4“four irrigations at CRI, Tillering, Booting and Milking stage (I3) recorded highest value of grain yield (4381.60 kg ha-1), straw yield (6651.15 kg ha-1) and harvest index (39.70 %) with profitability in terms of net return (Rs. 83908.79 ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic mulch with kaolin spray (M1) gave significantly the highest grain yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray (M1)e5
- Outcome
- grain yielde5
- Direction
- significantly higheste5
- Value
- 4230.40 kg ha-1e5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e5“organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray (M1) recorded significantly highest grain yield (4230.40 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic mulch with kaolin spray (M1) gave significantly the highest straw yield of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray (M1)e6
- Outcome
- straw yielde6
- Direction
- significantly higheste6
- Value
- 6578.57 kg ha-1e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e6“organic mulch @ 10 t ha-1 + Kaolin 6% spray (M1) recorded significantly highest grain yield (4230.40 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6578.57 kg ha-1)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 85% RDF with FYM at 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) gave the maximum grain yield of wheat compared with other nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2)e7
- Outcome
- grain yielde7
- Direction
- maximume7
- Value
- 4117.60 kg ha-1e7
- Comparator
- other treatmentse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) also recorded maximum grain yield (4117.60 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6338.71 kg ha-1) and net return (Rs. 77770.83 ha-1) compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The 85% RDF with FYM at 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) gave the maximum straw yield of wheat compared with other nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2)e7
- Outcome
- straw yielde7
- Direction
- maximume7
- Value
- 6338.71 kg ha-1e7
- Comparator
- other treatmentse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) also recorded maximum grain yield (4117.60 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6338.71 kg ha-1) and net return (Rs. 77770.83 ha-1) compared to other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
The 85% RDF with FYM at 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) gave the maximum net return of wheat compared with other nutrient treatments.
- Taxon
- wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- 85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2)e7
- Outcome
- net returne7
- Direction
- maximume7
- Value
- Rs. 77770.83 ha-1e7
- Comparator
- other treatmentse7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
e7“85% RDF + FYM @ 5.0 t ha-1 (N2) also recorded maximum grain yield (4117.60 kg ha-1) and straw yield (6338.71 kg ha-1) and net return (Rs. 77770.83 ha-1) compared to other treatments”
The same questions in other papers
kaolin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
318 papers more in this group
See all 322 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.