Paper · 2022 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

The influence of rhizobia and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi co-inoculation on growth and yield of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in the greenhouse and the field

Hizkiyas Wondosen; Beyene Dobo; Abraham Mikru; et al.

13
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of chemical inputs in agriculture has a negative influence on the environment. Application of chemical fertilizers (F) can be reduced by using bio-fertilizers like arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) and Rhizobium (R). Chick pea was co-inoculated and grown in the greenhouse and in the field to investigate their effect on growth and yield. All assessed plant growth parameters were found to be highest in plants treated with AMF and Rhizobium after three months of growth. Plants treated with R+AMF+F had greater average shoot length, stem girth, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight, branch per plant, and number of pods than those treated with R+M. However, R+M had a higher number of nodules than R+AMF+F in the greenhouse, and for co-inoculation in the field, indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer application had the highest shoot length (82.02.3), number of pods (75.02.6), dry weight (109.511.2), 100 seed weight (14.20.2), and husk weight (12.060.2) when compared to the control. Furthermore, root colonization ranged from 63.72.9% to 85.08.1% for all AMF infected treatments. In the green house, the maximum spore density (560.017.3 spore/50g dry soil) was recorded for solitary mycorrhiza inoculated chickpea. As a result, it is determined that dual inoculation of the pulse with AMF and Rhizobium, both with and without NPK treatment, increased growth and production. This suggests that smallholder farmers may be able to use bio-inoculants to boost chickpea output.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and Rhizobium treated chickpea had the highest assessed growth parameters after three months.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
AMF and Rhizobiume0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
after three months of growthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All assessed plant growth parameters were found to be highest in plants treated with AMF and Rhizobium after three months of growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–481 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R+AMF+F produced greater shoot length, stem girth and shoot dry weight than R+M.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
R+AMF+Fe0
Outcome
shoot length, stem girth, shoot dry weighte0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
R+Me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with R+AMF+F had greater average shoot length, stem girth, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight, branch per plant, and number of pods than those treated with R+M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R+AMF+F produced greater root dry weight, shoot fresh weight and branch number than R+M.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
R+AMF+Fe0
Outcome
root dry weight, shoot fresh weight, branch per plante0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
R+Me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with R+AMF+F had greater average shoot length, stem girth, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight, branch per plant, and number of pods than those treated with R+M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R+AMF+F produced more pods than R+M.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
R+AMF+Fe0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
R+Me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with R+AMF+F had greater average shoot length, stem girth, shoot dry weight, root dry weight, shoot fresh weight, branch per plant, and number of pods than those treated with R+M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–676 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

R+M had more nodules than R+AMF+F in the greenhouse.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
R+Me0
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
R+AMF+Fe0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“R+M had a higher number of nodules than R+AMF+F in the greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–751 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field co-inoculation with indigenous rhizobium and AMF plus fertilizer gave the highest shoot length, 82.02.3.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer applicatione0
Interactor
rhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
82.02.3e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer application had the highest shoot length (82.02.3), number of pods (75.02.6), dry weight (109.511.2), 100 seed weight (14.20.2), and husk weight (12.060.2) when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same field treatment gave the highest pod number, 75.02.6.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
75.02.6e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer application had the highest shoot length (82.02.3), number of pods (75.02.6), dry weight (109.511.2), 100 seed weight (14.20.2), and husk weight (12.060.2) when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same field treatment gave the highest dry weight, 109.511.2.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
109.511.2e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer application had the highest shoot length (82.02.3), number of pods (75.02.6), dry weight (109.511.2), 100 seed weight (14.20.2), and husk weight (12.060.2) when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same field treatment gave the highest 100 seed weight, 14.20.2.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.20.2e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer application had the highest shoot length (82.02.3), number of pods (75.02.6), dry weight (109.511.2), 100 seed weight (14.20.2), and husk weight (12.060.2) when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same field treatment gave the highest husk weight, 12.060.2.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
husk weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.060.2e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous rhizobium and AMF with fertilizer application had the highest shoot length (82.02.3), number of pods (75.02.6), dry weight (109.511.2), 100 seed weight (14.20.2), and husk weight (12.060.2) when compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–1019 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root colonization ranged from 63.72.9% to 85.08.1% across AMF infected treatments.

Taxon
Chick peaCicer arietinume1
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
root colonizatione0
Value
63.72.9% to 85.08.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root colonization ranged from 63.72.9% to 85.08.1% for all AMF infected treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1116 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chick pea was co-inoculated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solitary mycorrhiza inoculation produced the maximum spore density of 560.017.3 spore/50g dry soil in greenhouse chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
solitary mycorrhiza inoculatede0
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Outcome
spore densitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
560.017.3 spore/50g dry soile0
Setting
green housee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the green house, the maximum spore density (560.017.3 spore/50g dry soil) was recorded for solitary mycorrhiza inoculated chickpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1252 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest bio-inoculants for smallholder farmers to boost chickpea output.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
use bio-inoculants to boost chickpea outpute0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“smallholder farmers may be able to use bio-inoculants to boost chickpea output”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1509 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 45 positive, 1 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

mycorrhiza · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · Rhizobium · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.