Abstract
Influence of biological destructors Phylazonit SV and soil inoculant Phylazonit TO on yield of agricultural crops and basic soil parameters were researched. They included the following bacterial strains Bacillus circulans, Pseudomonas putida, Azotobacter chroococcum, Bacillus megaterium. It was established, that using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%. Additionally, the hummus parameters increased by 0.03–0.08%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 1.0–7.0 mg/kg, phosphorous movable forms by 2.0–6.0 mg/kg, potassium’s movable forms by 3.0–13.0 mg/kg soil. The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%. The soil-centric technology came to humus parameters increase by 0.05–0.1%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 5.0–15.0 mg/kg, phosphorous mobile forms by 8.0–18.0 mg/kg and potassium movable forms by 6.0–18.0 mg/kg in soil. The researched technologies for soil fertility evaluation showed the following notional net income for pea growing 315,7– 522,2 UAH/ha, for soybean growing — 585,0– 764,4 UAH/ha, for potato growing — 4516,0– 6284,0 UAH/ha, for maize growing — 1324,0– 2014,0 UAH/ha. The usage of technology profitability made for pea 9.8–12.6%, for soybean 13.7–18.3%, for potato 56.1–111.8%, for maize 31.2–40.5%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV before plowing plus Phylazonit TO in spring increased pea yield by 22.8%.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse0 - Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- pea yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 22.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV before plowing plus Phylazonit TO in spring increased soybean yield by 21.9%.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- soybeane0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 21.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV before plowing plus Phylazonit TO in spring increased potato yield by 11.2%.
- Taxon
- potato
Solanum tuberosume0 - Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- potatoe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 11.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV before plowing plus Phylazonit TO in spring increased maize yield by 19.4%.
- Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- maizee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 19.4%e0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology with Phylazonit SV, Phylazonit TO and mineral fertilizers increased pea yield by 30.1%.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- pea yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 30.1%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology with Phylazonit SV, Phylazonit TO and mineral fertilizers increased soybean yield by 36.8%.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- soybeane0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 36.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology with Phylazonit SV, Phylazonit TO and mineral fertilizers increased potato yield by 22.9%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- potatoe0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 22.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology with Phylazonit SV, Phylazonit TO and mineral fertilizers increased maize yield by 35.8%.
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- maizee0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 35.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV plus Phylazonit TO increased soil humus parameters by 0.03–0.08%.
- Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- hummus parameterse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 0.03–0.08%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%. Additionally, the hummus parameters increased by 0.03–0.08%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 1.0–7.0 mg/kg, phosphorous movable forms by 2.0–6.0 mg/kg, potassium’s movable forms by 3.0–13.0 mg/kg soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV plus Phylazonit TO increased soil lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 1.0–7.0 mg/kg.
- Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- lightly hydrolyzed nitrogene0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 1.0–7.0 mg/kge0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%. Additionally, the hummus parameters increased by 0.03–0.08%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 1.0–7.0 mg/kg, phosphorous movable forms by 2.0–6.0 mg/kg, potassium’s movable forms by 3.0–13.0 mg/kg soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV plus Phylazonit TO increased soil movable phosphorus forms by 2.0–6.0 mg/kg.
- Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- phosphorous movable formse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.0–6.0 mg/kge0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%. Additionally, the hummus parameters increased by 0.03–0.08%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 1.0–7.0 mg/kg, phosphorous movable forms by 2.0–6.0 mg/kg, potassium’s movable forms by 3.0–13.0 mg/kg soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Phylazonit SV plus Phylazonit TO increased soil movable potassium forms by 3.0–13.0 mg/kg.
- Treatment
- Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/hae0
- Outcome
- potassium’s movable formse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3.0–13.0 mg/kge0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“using Phylazonit SV before plowing at the rate 10 l/ha and in spring Phylazonit TO at rate 15 l/ha have increased pea yield by 22.8%, soybean by 21.9%, potato by 11.2%, maize by 19.4%. Additionally, the hummus parameters increased by 0.03–0.08%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 1.0–7.0 mg/kg, phosphorous movable forms by 2.0–6.0 mg/kg, potassium’s movable forms by 3.0–13.0 mg/kg soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology increased soil humus parameters by 0.05–0.1%.
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- humus parameterse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.05–0.1%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%. The soil-centric technology came to humus parameters increase by 0.05–0.1%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 5.0–15.0 mg/kg, phosphorous mobile forms by 8.0–18.0 mg/kg and potassium movable forms by 6.0–18.0 mg/kg in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology increased soil lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 5.0–15.0 mg/kg.
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- lightly hydrolyzed nitrogene0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 5.0–15.0 mg/kge0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%. The soil-centric technology came to humus parameters increase by 0.05–0.1%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 5.0–15.0 mg/kg, phosphorous mobile forms by 8.0–18.0 mg/kg and potassium movable forms by 6.0–18.0 mg/kg in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology increased soil mobile phosphorus forms by 8.0–18.0 mg/kg.
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- phosphorous mobile formse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 8.0–18.0 mg/kge0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%. The soil-centric technology came to humus parameters increase by 0.05–0.1%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 5.0–15.0 mg/kg, phosphorous mobile forms by 8.0–18.0 mg/kg and potassium movable forms by 6.0–18.0 mg/kg in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The soil-centric technology increased soil movable potassium forms by 6.0–18.0 mg/kg.
- Treatment
- soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers inpute0
- Outcome
- potassium movable formse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 6.0–18.0 mg/kge0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The soil-centric technology besides Phylazonit SV and Phylazonit TO with mineral fertilizers input came to pea yield increase by 30.1%, soybean by 36.8%, potato by 22.9%, maize by 35.8%. The soil-centric technology came to humus parameters increase by 0.05–0.1%, lightly hydrolyzed nitrogen by 5.0–15.0 mg/kg, phosphorous mobile forms by 8.0–18.0 mg/kg and potassium movable forms by 6.0–18.0 mg/kg in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
The researched technologies gave notional net income of 315.7-522.2 UAH/ha for pea, 585.0-764.4 UAH/ha for soybean, 4516.0-6284.0 UAH/ha for potato and 1324.0-2014.0 UAH/ha for maize.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- notional net incomee0
- Value
- 315,7– 522,2 UAH/hae0
- Qualifier
- soybean growing — 585,0– 764,4 UAH/ha, for potato growing — 4516,0– 6284,0 UAH/ha, for maize growing — 1324,0– 2014,0 UAH/hae0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“notional net income for pea growing 315,7– 522,2 UAH/ha, for soybean growing — 585,0– 764,4 UAH/ha, for potato growing — 4516,0– 6284,0 UAH/ha, for maize growing — 1324,0– 2014,0 UAH/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology profitability was 9.8-12.6% for pea, 13.7-18.3% for soybean, 56.1-111.8% for potato and 31.2-40.5% for maize.
- Taxon
- peaLathyrus oleraceuse0
- Outcome
- profitabilitye0
- Value
- 9.8–12.6%e0
- Qualifier
- soybean 13.7–18.3%, for potato 56.1–111.8%, for maize 31.2–40.5%e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“technology profitability made for pea 9.8–12.6%, for soybean 13.7–18.3%, for potato 56.1–111.8%, for maize 31.2–40.5%”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
158 papers more in this group
See all 162 papers →tillage · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →fertilization · organism · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →tillage · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →fertilization · organism · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →tillage · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →fertilization · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
215 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
236 papers more in this group
See all 240 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.