Paper · 2022 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Soil copper and manganese availability to wheat (Triticum aestivum) as affected by long-term fertilization in an Inceptisol

ANIT DAS; MAHESH C MEENA; S P DATTA; et al.

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn) are two most important micronutrients, essential to living organisms through their involvement in different enzymes and other biologically active molecules. An experiment was conducted at the research farm of ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi to investigate the impact of various fertilizers and manurial treatments on DTPA-extractable Cu and Mn in soil and their concentration in grain and straw of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) after 46 years of continuous cropping. The soil and plants samples were collected at wheat harvest during April, 2018 and April, 2019 following fertilizers and manurial treatments: control, N alone, NP, NPK, 150% NPK, NPK+Zn and NPK+FYM. Results revealed that DTPA-extractable Cu did not show any significant variation among the various treatments except control but DTPA-Mn was highest under FYM treated plot. In addition, nutrient management options such as 150% NPK, NPK+FYM and NPK+Zn were equally effective in enhancing the yield of wheat. The concentration of Cu and Mn in grain varied from 5.25–7.63 and 28.5–36.4 mg/kg, respectively under different nutrient management options. Highest uptake of Cu and Mn was obtained under NPK+FYM treatment while control showed the lowest, indicating importance of organic manures for improving the nutritional quality of food grains. Transfer coefficient (indicating transfer nutrients from vegetative tissue to grain) of Cu did not change by fertilization and manuring to a significant level whereas balance and integrated use of fertilizers and manure significantly increased the transfer of Mn from straw to grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil extractable Cu varied little among treatments except control.

Outcome
DTPA-extractable Cue0
Direction
did not show any significant variatione0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DTPA-extractable Cu did not show any significant variation among the various treatments except control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil extractable Mn was highest in the FYM treated plot.

Treatment
FYMe0
Outcome
DTPA-Mne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DTPA-Mn was highest under FYM treated plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150% NPK enhanced wheat yield.

Treatment
150% NPKe0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% NPK, NPK+FYM and NPK+Zn were equally effective in enhancing the yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK+FYM enhanced wheat yield.

Treatment
NPK+FYMe0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% NPK, NPK+FYM and NPK+Zn were equally effective in enhancing the yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1025 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK+Zn enhanced wheat yield.

Treatment
NPK+Zne0
Outcome
yield of wheate0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“150% NPK, NPK+FYM and NPK+Zn were equally effective in enhancing the yield of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1025 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Cu concentration ranged from 5.25–7.63 mg/kg.

Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
concentration of Cue0
Direction
variede0
Value
5.25–7.63e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of Cu and Mn in grain varied from 5.25–7.63 and 28.5–36.4 mg/kg, respectively under different nutrient management options.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain Mn concentration ranged from 28.5–36.4 mg/kg.

Outcome
concentration of Cu and Mn in graine0
Direction
variede0
Value
28.5–36.4 mg/kge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The concentration of Cu and Mn in grain varied from 5.25–7.63 and 28.5–36.4 mg/kg, respectively under different nutrient management options.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu uptake was highest with NPK+FYM and lowest in control.

Treatment
NPK+FYMe0
Outcome
uptake of Cue0
Direction
Higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest uptake of Cu and Mn was obtained under NPK+FYM treatment while control showed the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn uptake was highest with NPK+FYM and lowest in control.

Treatment
NPK+FYMe0
Outcome
uptake of Cu and Mne0
Direction
Higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest uptake of Cu and Mn was obtained under NPK+FYM treatment while control showed the lowest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu transfer coefficient was not significantly changed by fertilizer and manure.

Treatment
fertilization and manuringe0
Outcome
Transfer coefficiente0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Transfer coefficient (indicating transfer nutrients from vegetative tissue to grain) of Cu did not change by fertilization and manuring to a significant level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced integrated fertilizer and manure increased Mn transfer from straw to grain.

Treatment
integrated use of fertilizers and manuree0
Outcome
transfer of Mn from straw to grainse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“balance and integrated use of fertilizers and manure significantly increased the transfer of Mn from straw to grains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1644 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–47 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.