Abstract
Research was conducted using Andrada winter wheat variety created at the Agricultural Research and Development Station Turda. The crop was treated with two types of foliar fertilizers, Folimax Gold and MicrofertU which were applied in two tillage systems: conventional and no-tillage. The main purpose of this paper is to assess the influence of foliar fertilization in the two systems of conventional tillage and conservative systems with no-tillage. Various growth stages of the wheat crop, in achieving high yields and quality indices were assessed. The promotion and identification of physiological mechanisms in wheat are useful in assessing biological development, correlated with the productivity elements of winter wheat. Measurements of assimilation of the physiological parameters and chlorophyll concentration were performed on the standard flag leaf five days from the last treatment, using foliar fertilizers considering the duration of adaptation of tissues in flag leaf. Measurements were performed five times per plant and five plants per variant, with three repetitions in June. Technology used in wheat cultivation showed that the net assimilation, physiological parameters, and production were higher, registering higher values for the conventional system (tilling), ranging between 27-30 μmolm<sub<-2</sub< s<sub<-1</sub<, and an increase of production, of over 700 kg ha-1. The values were statistically confirmed, as being significantly positive, compared to those from the conservative no-tillage system, in the conditions of the Transylvanian Plain. Physiological parameters taken into study had higher values for the conventional system in the variants treated with foliar fertilizers, compared to the no-tillage system, leaf to air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) being inversely proportional. Foliar fertilization applied to the Andrada wheat variety has beneficially influenced the quality indices in the two tillage systems, the percentage of protein obtained being between 12.1-13.8%, gluten between 23.5-27.3%, Zeleny index between 35-48%, and the mass of one thousand grains (MTG) was between 50-53.1 g.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage had higher wheat net assimilation and physiological parameters than no-tillage, with assimilation of 27-30 μmolm<sub<-2</sub< s<sub<-1</sub<.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- conventional system (tilling)e0
- Outcome
- net assimilation, physiological parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 27-30 μmolm<sub<-2</sub< s<sub<-1</sub<e0
- Comparator
- conservative no-tillage systeme1
- Setting
- Transylvanian Plaine1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“WHEAT”
e0“net assimilation, physiological parameters, and production were higher, registering higher values for the conventional system (tilling), ranging between 27-30 μmolm<sub<-2</sub< s<sub<-1</sub<”
e1“The values were statistically confirmed, as being significantly positive, compared to those from the conservative no-tillage system, in the conditions of the Transylvanian Plain”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage increased wheat production by over 700 kg ha-1 relative to no-tillage.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- conventional system (tilling)e0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- over 700 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- conservative no-tillage systeme1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“WHEAT”
e0“higher values for the conventional system (tilling), ranging between 27-30 μmolm<sub<-2</sub< s<sub<-1</sub<, and an increase of production, of over 700 kg ha-1”
e1“compared to those from the conservative no-tillage system”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar-fertilized conventional-tillage wheat showed higher physiological parameters than no-tillage wheat, while VPD was inversely proportional.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- conventional system in the variants treated with foliar fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- Physiological parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- leaf to air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) being inversely proportionale0
- Comparator
- no-tillage systeme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“WHEAT”
e0“Physiological parameters taken into study had higher values for the conventional system in the variants treated with foliar fertilizers, compared to the no-tillage system, leaf to air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) being inversely proportional”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilization benefited protein percentage in Andrada wheat, which ranged from 12.1-13.8%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Andradae0
- Treatment
- Foliar fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- percentage of proteine0
- Direction
- beneficially influencede0
- Value
- 12.1-13.8%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar fertilization applied to the Andrada wheat variety has beneficially influenced the quality indices in the two tillage systems, the percentage of protein obtained being between 12.1-13.8%”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilization benefited gluten percentage in Andrada wheat, which ranged from 23.5-27.3%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Andradae0
- Treatment
- Foliar fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- glutene0
- Direction
- beneficially influencede0
- Value
- 23.5-27.3%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“WHEAT”
e0“Foliar fertilization applied to the Andrada wheat variety has beneficially influenced the quality indices in the two tillage systems, the percentage of protein obtained being between 12.1-13.8%, gluten between 23.5-27.3%”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilization benefited the Zeleny index in Andrada wheat, which ranged from 35-48%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Andradae0
- Treatment
- Foliar fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- Zeleny indexe0
- Direction
- beneficially influencede0
- Value
- 35-48%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar fertilization applied to the Andrada wheat variety has beneficially influenced the quality indices in the two tillage systems, the percentage of protein obtained being between 12.1-13.8%, gluten between 23.5-27.3%, Zeleny index between 35-48%”
Claim · model-written summary
Foliar fertilization benefited thousand-grain mass in Andrada wheat, which ranged from 50-53.1 g.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Material
- Andradae0
- Treatment
- Foliar fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- mass of one thousand grains (MTG)e0
- Direction
- beneficially influencede0
- Value
- 50-53.1 ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Foliar fertilization applied to the Andrada wheat variety has beneficially influenced the quality indices in the two tillage systems, the percentage of protein obtained being between 12.1-13.8%, gluten between 23.5-27.3%, Zeleny index between 35-48%, and the mass of one thousand grains (MTG) was between 50-53.1 g”
The same questions in other papers
cultivation system · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →application · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
121 papers more in this group
See all 125 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
562 papers more in this group
See all 566 papers →application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- positive
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- no effect
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.