Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Integrated use of phosphorus fertilizer and farmyard manure improves wheat productivity by improving soil quality and P availability in calcareous soil under subhumid conditions

Aftab Jamal; Muhammad F. Saeed; Adil Mihoub; et al.

16
claims
34
verbatim quotes
73
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Low soil fertility and high fertilizer costs are constraints to wheat production, which may be resolved with integrating fertilizer phosphorus (P) and farm-yard manure (FYM). Study objectives were to evaluate P source impacts on soil, P efficiency, and wheat growth in a calcareous soil. Methods: Treatments included P fertilizer (0, 17, 26, or 39 kg P ha-1) and/or FYM (0 or 10 T ha-1) in a: 1) incubation experiment and 2) wheat (Triticum aestivum spp.) field experiment. Results and Discussion: Soil organic matter increased (30-72%) linearly for both fertilizer and FYM, whereas pH decreased (0.1-0.3 units) with fertilizer only. Addition of fertilizer and FYM increased plant available P (AB-DTPA extractable soil P) an average of 0.5 mg P kg-1 soil week-1 with incubation. The initial increase was 1-9 mg P kg-1, with further increase after 84 d of ~3-17 mg P kg-1. There was also a significant increase of available P in the soil supporting plants in the field study, although the magnitude of the increase was only 2 mg kg-1 at most for the highest fertilizer rate + FYM. Grain (66 to 119%) and straw (25-65%) yield increased significantly, peaking at 26 kg P ha-1 + FYM. The P Absorption Efficiency (PAE), P Balance (PB), and P Uptake (PU) increased linearly with P rate, with the highest levels at the highest P rate. The P Use Efficiency (PUE) was highest at the lowest rates of P, with general decreases with increasing P, although not consistently. Principal component analysis revealed that 94.34 % of the total variance was accounted for with PC1 (84.04 %) and PC2 (10.33 %), with grain straw yield significantly correlated to SOM, PU, and PAE. Regression analysis showed highly significant correlation of PB with P-input (R2= 0.99), plant available P (R2= 0.85), and PU (R2= 0.80). The combination of FYM at the rate of 10 T ha-1 and fertilizer P at 26 kg P ha-1 was found as the optimum dose that significantly increased yield. It is concluded that FYM concoction with fertilizer-P not only improved SOM and residual soil P, but also enhanced wheat yields with reasonable P efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter increased linearly with fertilizer and FYM, by 30-72%.

Treatment
fertilizer and FYMe1
Outcome
Soil organic mattere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30-72%e1
Qualifier
linearlye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil organic matter increased (30-72%) linearly for both fertilizer and FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH decreased by 0.1-0.3 units with fertilizer only.

Treatment
fertilizer onlye2
Outcome
pHe2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
0.1-0.3 unitse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas pH decreased (0.1-0.3 units) with fertilizer only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer and FYM increased plant available P by an average of 0.5 mg P kg-1 soil per week during incubation.

Treatment
fertilizer and FYMe3
Outcome
plant available Pe3
Direction
increasede3
Value
0.5 mg P kg-1 soil week-1e3
Setting
incubatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of fertilizer and FYM increased plant available P (AB-DTPA extractable soil P) an average of 0.5 mg P kg-1 soil week-1 with incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The initial increase in plant available P was 1-9 mg P kg-1 under fertilizer and FYM.

Treatment
fertilizer and FYMe3
Outcome
initial increasee4
Direction
increasee4
Value
1-9 mg P kg-1e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of fertilizer and FYM increased plant available P (AB-DTPA extractable soil P) an average of 0.5 mg P kg-1 soil week-1 with incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–791 · show in text ↑
e4

“The initial increase was 1-9 mg P kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–831 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further increase in plant available P after 84 days was about 3-17 mg P kg-1 under fertilizer and FYM.

Treatment
fertilizer and FYMe3
Outcome
further increasee5
Direction
increasee5
Value
~3-17 mg P kg-1e5
Qualifier
after 84 de5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of fertilizer and FYM increased plant available P (AB-DTPA extractable soil P) an average of 0.5 mg P kg-1 soil week-1 with incubation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–791 · show in text ↑
e5

“with further increase after 84 d of ~3-17 mg P kg-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 833–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the field study, available P increased by only 2 mg kg-1 at most at the highest fertilizer rate plus FYM.

Treatment
highest fertilizer rate + FYMe6
Outcome
available Pe6
Direction
increasee6
Value
2 mg kg-1e6
Setting
field studye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e6

“There was also a significant increase of available P in the soil supporting plants in the field study, although the magnitude of the increase was only 2 mg kg-1 at most for the highest fertilizer rate + FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield increased by 66 to 119% with P fertilizer and FYM, peaking at 26 kg P ha-1 plus FYM.

Treatment
26 kg P ha-1 + FYMe7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
66 to 119%e7
Qualifier
Graine7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain (66 to 119%) and straw (25-65%) yield increased significantly, peaking at 26 kg P ha-1 + FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield increased by 25 to 65% with P fertilizer and FYM, peaking at 26 kg P ha-1 plus FYM.

Treatment
26 kg P ha-1 + FYMe7
Outcome
yielde7
Direction
increasede7
Value
25-65%e7
Qualifier
strawe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e7

“Grain (66 to 119%) and straw (25-65%) yield increased significantly, peaking at 26 kg P ha-1 + FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P absorption efficiency, P balance and P uptake increased linearly with P rate, highest at the highest P rate.

Treatment
P ratee0
Outcome
P Absorption Efficiency (PAE), P Balance (PB), and P Uptake (PU)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
with the highest levels at the highest P ratee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The P Absorption Efficiency (PAE), P Balance (PB), and P Uptake (PU) increased linearly with P rate, with the highest levels at the highest P rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P use efficiency was highest at the lowest P rates, with general but not consistent decreases with increasing P.

Treatment
increasing Pe1
Outcome
P Use Efficiency (PUE)e1
Direction
decreasese1
Qualifier
although not consistentlye1
Comparator
lowest rates of Pe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“The P Use Efficiency (PUE) was highest at the lowest rates of P, with general decreases with increasing P, although not consistently”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1474 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain straw yield was significantly correlated with SOM, PU and PAE.

Outcome
grain straw yielde2
Qualifier
SOM, PU, and PAEe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“with grain straw yield significantly correlated to SOM, PU, and PAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1672 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PC1 and PC2 accounted for 94.34 % of the total variance.

Outcome
total variancee3
Value
94.34 %e3
Qualifier
PC1 (84.04 %) and PC2 (10.33 %)e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e3

“94.34 % of the total variance was accounted for with PC1 (84.04 %) and PC2 (10.33 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1603 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PB was highly significantly correlated with P-input (R2 = 0.99).

Outcome
PBe4
Value
R2= 0.99e4
Comparator
P-inpute4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regression analysis showed highly significant correlation of PB with P-input (R2= 0.99), plant available P (R2= 0.85), and PU (R2= 0.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1810 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PB was highly significantly correlated with plant available P (R2 = 0.85).

Outcome
PBe4
Value
R2= 0.85e4
Comparator
plant available Pe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regression analysis showed highly significant correlation of PB with P-input (R2= 0.99), plant available P (R2= 0.85), and PU (R2= 0.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1810 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PB was highly significantly correlated with PU (R2 = 0.80).

Outcome
PBe4
Value
R2= 0.80e4
Comparator
PUe4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e4

“Regression analysis showed highly significant correlation of PB with P-input (R2= 0.99), plant available P (R2= 0.85), and PU (R2= 0.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM at 10 t ha-1 with 26 kg P ha-1 was the optimum dose that significantly increased wheat yield.

Treatment
FYM at the rate of 10 T ha-1 and fertilizer P at 26 kg P ha-1e5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“improves wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–87 · show in text ↑
e5

“The combination of FYM at the rate of 10 T ha-1 and fertilizer P at 26 kg P ha-1 was found as the optimum dose that significantly increased yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1957 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.