Paper · 2024 · Agronomy

Long-Term Manuring and Fertilization Influence on Soil Properties and Wheat Productivity in Semi-Arid Regions

Manju Kumari; Dhram Prakash; Sunita Sheoran; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Information on the long-term effects of the addition of organics and fertilizers to wheat under the pearl millet–wheat cropping system with semi-arid conditions in north-western India is still lacking. The present research was conducted in an ongoing field experiment initiated during Rabi 1995 at the Research Farm of Chaudhary Charan Singh at Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. After 25 years, the impacts of nutrient management practices on soil fertility and wheat productivity were evaluated. The experiment comprised a total of eight treatment combinations viz. half and full doses of recommended fertilizers (N and P), organic manures (FYM: farmyard manure, POM: poultry manure, and PRM: press mud) alone and in combination with NP fertilizers. The conjoint application of organic manure and chemical fertilizers resulted in a positive influx of nutrients via increasing total organic carbon (TOC), available N, P, K, and S, which ranged from 0.46 to 1.42%, 122.70 to 194.70, 15.66 to 74.92, 340.5 to 761.2, and 15.26 to 54.63 kg ha−1 in surface soil (0–15 cm), respectively. Carbon fractions and crop yield were significantly improved by adopting integrated nutrient management (INM). The TOC showed a positive and significant correlation with C fractions (r > 0.92) and with soil-available N, P, K, and S (r > 0.77) content. The data also revealed a strong relationship between TOC and soil-available (0–15 cm) nutrients i.e., available N (R2= 0.769), available P (R2 = 0.881), available K (R2 = 0.758), and available S (R2 = 0.914), respectively. Thus, practices that increased TOC were also beneficial in enhancing the availability of the nutrients in the soil. A positive and highly significant correlation was also found among wheat yield, nutrient (NPKS) content, and uptake. A polynomial relationship between grain yield and grain N (R2 = 0.962), P (R2 = 0.946), and K (R2 = 0.967) content, and between straw yield and straw N (R2 = 0.830), P (R2 = 0.541) and K (R2 = 0.976) content was obtained. Integrated use of PRM7.5 followed by FYM15 and POM5 coupled with NP fertilizers proved best, which could be beneficial for obtaining nutritious and highest wheat yield (grain: 6.01 t ha−1 and straw: 7.70 t ha−1) coupled with improved fertility within a sustained manner under the pearl millet–wheat sequence in prevailing semi-arid conditions of the North Indian state of Haryana.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint organic manure and fertilizer use increased total organic carbon and available N and P.

Treatment
conjoint application of organic manure and chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
total organic carbon (TOC), available N, Pe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conjoint application of organic manure and chemical fertilizers resulted in a positive influx of nutrients via increasing total organic carbon (TOC), available N, P, K, and S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Joint organic manure and fertilizer use increased available K and S.

Treatment
conjoint application of organic manure and chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
K, and Se0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The conjoint application of organic manure and chemical fertilizers resulted in a positive influx of nutrients via increasing total organic carbon (TOC), available N, P, K, and S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved carbon fractions.

Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
Carbon fractionse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon fractions and crop yield were significantly improved by adopting integrated nutrient management (INM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management significantly improved crop yield.

Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carbon fractions and crop yield were significantly improved by adopting integrated nutrient management (INM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total organic carbon was positively correlated with carbon fractions.

Outcome
C fractionse0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
r > 0.92e0
Comparator
TOCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TOC showed a positive and significant correlation with C fractions (r > 0.92)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1279 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total organic carbon was positively correlated with soil available N, P, K and S.

Outcome
soil-available N, P, K, and Se0
Direction
positivee0
Qualifier
r > 0.77e0
Comparator
TOCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The TOC showed a positive and significant correlation with C fractions (r > 0.92) and with soil-available N, P, K, and S (r > 0.77) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1337 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total organic carbon had a strong relationship with available N, P, K and S.

Outcome
soil-available (0–15 cm) nutrientse0
Comparator
TOCe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a strong relationship between TOC and soil-available (0–15 cm) nutrients i.e., available N (R2= 0.769), available P (R2 = 0.881), available K (R2 = 0.758), and available S (R2 = 0.914)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat yield, nutrient content and nutrient uptake were positively correlated.

Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
nutrient (NPKS) content, and uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive and highly significant correlation was also found among wheat yield, nutrient (NPKS) content, and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1793 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield had polynomial relationships with grain N, P and K content.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Comparator
grain Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A polynomial relationship between grain yield and grain N (R2 = 0.962), P (R2 = 0.946), and K (R2 = 0.967) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield had polynomial relationships with straw N, P and K content.

Outcome
straw yielde0
Comparator
straw Ne0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“between straw yield and straw N (R2 = 0.830), P (R2 = 0.541) and K (R2 = 0.976) content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1915–2002 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRM7.5 with NP fertilizers gave the best grain yield of 6.01 t ha−1.

Treatment
PRM7.5e0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.01 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated use of PRM7.5 followed by FYM15 and POM5 coupled with NP fertilizers proved best, which could be beneficial for obtaining nutritious and highest wheat yield (grain: 6.01 t ha−1 and straw: 7.70 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2228 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PRM7.5 with NP fertilizers gave the best straw yield of 7.70 t ha−1.

Treatment
PRM7.5e0
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
7.70 t ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Integrated use of PRM7.5 followed by FYM15 and POM5 coupled with NP fertilizers proved best, which could be beneficial for obtaining nutritious and highest wheat yield (grain: 6.01 t ha−1 and straw: 7.70 t ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2017–2228 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 53 positive, 4 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

189 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.